We are in 1963 and while London is swinging, it seems itโs not quite ready to embrace the sexual antics of the Duchess of Argyll.
Born in 1912, the vivacious, party-loving Margaret Campbell was the darling of Britainโs society set until a bitter and very public divorce battle with her second husband, Ian Douglas Campbell, 11th Duke of Argyll, one of Scotlandโs most powerful noblemen and owner-occupier of the 90-room Inveraray Castle, ripped her reputation to shreds.
The acrimonious split was the culmination of years of legal wrangling as the tempestuous couple indulged in ever-increasing tit for tat skirmishes, suing and counter-suing each other.
But what was revealed and pored over in smutty detail in the final courtroom stoush shocked the nation.

Margaret was incredibly popular and charming
(Photo: Shutterstock)This was the longest, costliest and most notorious divorce trial in British history, opening up the Duchessโs private diaries to painful public scrutiny and famously hinging on a set of pornographic polaroid photographs that the Duke had stolen from his wifeโs private desk drawers and cupboards in her London townhouse while she was overseas.
In the arty images were the torsos of naked men with a woman, her face turned away from the camera, performing oral sex.
Though the features were unrecognisable, Margaret could be identified by her signature three-strand pearls.
When questioned, she claimed the man in question was the Duke, which prompted a medical examination to see if his naked attributes sized up!
The doctor declared this was not in fact the Duke, who in his divorce petition had listed the names of 88 lovers he claimed his wife had entertained throughout their marriage. He then named three suspects whom he suggested could be โthe headless manโ in the photo.
The case hit front page headlines day after day and neither the Duke nor the Duchess came out of it well. Their louche living was laid bare, the Dukeโs addictions and brutality picked over; but it was Margaretโs reputation that was dragged through the mud.
The judgements of disapproving men displayed what, with 21st century eyes, feel like the deep-seated misogyny and sexism that propped up the framework of the decaying aristocracy Margaret had married into. I suspect we would see her in a different light today.
Certainly Margaret dared to take on the hypocrisy of her accusers and was punished for her audacity.
That she enjoyed the company of men and enjoyed sex wasnโt something she felt she had to hide. The physical and emotional cruelty she endured at the hands of her husband she also wasnโt going to brush under the Persian carpet โ that and his brazen theft of her family money.

Margaret on her way to being presented to the royal family at Buckingham Palace in the early 1930s.
(Photo: Getty Images)Until this vile dressing down, Margaret, then 51, had been the beau mondeโs glittering jewel of charisma at every event she graced.
But now she was depicted as a lying, scheming nymphomaniac or, to quote Judge Lord Wheatleyโs excoriating 64,000-word judgement, โa highly-sexed woman who had ceased to be satisfied with normal relations and had started to indulge in what I can only describe as disgusting sexual activities to gratify a basic sexual appetiteโ.
The Duke was ultimately granted his divorce and Margaret lived until she was 80, doughty to the end, but this fascinating, if skittish Duchess never regained her standing among the ruling classes, and died penniless and ostracised by her own family.
So what really happened here?
Margaretโs story is reassessed in a gripping new three-part TV drama โ A Very British Scandal โ and the re-release of Charles Castleโs 1994 biography The Duchess Who Dared, based on an extraordinary series of exclusive interviews with Margaret which took place in the mid-1970s but couldnโt be published at the time for legal reasons.

Charles Castleโs 1994 biography The Duchess Who Dared
(Photo: Swift Press)Margaret was an heiress in her own right, the daughter of a Scottish self-made man and raised in a world of incredible financial privilege and comfort.
โShe was an enchantress,โ writes Charles Castle, โconsidered one of the most beautiful women of her generation and one of the 10 best-dressed in the world. Charming, elegant and gregarious, she was sought after.โ
British actor Claire Foy, who plays Margaret in the TV series, describes Margaret as โan โIt Girlโ and a debutante โฆ The year that Margaret was presented to court was the year it was all about fashion and romance. She came out when she was young โ at 16. She just loved everything to do with society and being in amongst it. She was special.โ
The fact that Margaret wasnโt born into the aristocracy and was raised in America didnโt hold her back, and though many felt she ached to be part of the blue-blooded beautiful people set, Claire is not so sure.
โMargaret was new money; her dad had worked really hard and she had the best of everything. But I donโt think she ever doubted in her life that she deserved everything; she was a social climber in a way but she wasnโt hungry for it.โ

Margaret and her first husband, Charles Sweeny, on their wedding day in 1933.
(Photo: Getty Images)One thing was obvious, though: Margaret loved to go out, adored the company of men and they adored her.
Many of the male friends who were cited as her lovers were most likely gay. Homosexuality was illegal and for Margaret, these men made wonderful escorts on nights out on the town.
By the age of 19 she already had four engagements under her belt, including to the Prince Aly Khan.
She eventually married US socialite and businessman Charles Sweeny in 1933. They had two children but the relationship ran out of puff, cordially so, and she divorced in 1947.
Four years later she fell hard for the Duke of Argyll. By all accounts, including her own, she really was in love, but things started to go wrong very quickly. Ian Campbell was a damaged man, suffering PTSD from his time as a prisoner of war in the Second World War.
He was addicted to alcohol, gambling and possibly drugs and outrageously sponged from his wivesโ family coffers โ Margaret was his third spouse โ to fund the running of his ancestral seat, Inveraray Castle, moving on when they realised what he was up to.

Margaret with the Duke of Argyll and their family in 1951;
(Photo: Getty Images)He was also unfaithful and though he could be charming, his behaviour was erratic and often cruel. Margaret was very much his latest victim.
โIan is a Duke and thatโs deeply attractive to her,โ notes Claire. โIn this period of time, Margaret has met every type of person in her circle. She loved entertaining; actors, politicians and collected people. In Ian, she meets someone who is different, who makes her laugh and who is arm candy. Heโs very handsome and the โun-gettable manโ. He is the one you want to be able to change; married twice before and she wants to succeed where two other women have failed. She falls in love with Inveraray Castle and sees it as so romantic. She was hopelessly romantic and sees the castle as a dream. But the dream goes terribly wrong.โ
โHe toyed with me as a cat plays with a mouse,โ Margaret confided to Charles Castle, โand every time he sensed that I had come to the end of my tether, he would then choose to become his most agreeable self, ready to do anything to please me. He was such an attractive man, I was a mere pawn in his hands. Even my father, who was such a clever man, was putty in his hands.โ
โThey are toxic from the beginning,โ explains Claire. โMargaret is very high-octane and his life is very much about alcohol and his addictions. She naively went into the relationship and didnโt want to find out anything else about him, but also vice versa.
โItโs fascinating in a way as Iโve never been in a drama where both of the people are so openly flawed. They donโt try and lessen their snobbery, their naivety or any of those things. They do love each other and it is, in its own way, a love story. Ten years after they divorced, Ian died. I would like to think there was some sort of romantic unfinished relationship.โ
When it all falls apart, the vitriol on both sides is brutal but especially from the Duke, who sets out to destroy his wife in a very public way.
While biographer Charles Castle became increasingly aware of Margaretโs faults โ she definitely lied, for instance, in court and out, and forged letters to the Duke questioning the legitimacy of his children from his first marriage as well as falsely accusing him of infidelity with her own stepmother โ he did admire her strength of character.
โSomething in her nature drove her on without fear to do precisely what she wanted, no matter the consequence,โ he writes.
For Sarah Phelps, who wrote The Very British Scandal TV series, it is this part of Margaretโs personality that is most fascinating to todayโs audience.
โItโs a story about a woman who refused to be slut-shamed, who refused to go quietly and refused to do as she was told,โ she says. โShe set fire to the expectation of her class, gender and her sex rather than go quietly. She put the private lives of the wealthy, the landed and the titled all over the front pages, not the untouchable great and good but bare, forked animals. Judge Wheatleyโs three-hour-long indictment of Margaretโs character, her sexual morals, destroyed her โฆ but I think sheโs heroic.โ
In light of current #MeToo battles, it is tempting to see Margaret as a pioneer, and Claire thinks the resurgence of interest in her story is because it does have a new focus.
โI hope that this drama allows a woman who was judged, ridiculed, belittled, manipulated and taken advantage of by the legal system, to at least have that shown. I think that the law doesnโt particularly treat women very well at all and this is just one example of how the odds were not stacked in her favour. She was an interesting woman and the more stories about interesting women, the better.โ

โSomething in her nature drove her on without fear to do precisely what she wanted, no matter the consequences.โ
(Image: Getty)For Sarah, Margaret is a woman to be admired.
โShe was honourable. Even before the nature of the photographs were made evident, Margaret was accused of having more than 80 lovers. She could have defended herself; some were single friends in extra-marital affairs and others, if sheโd been honest about them, would have been sent to prison for being gay.
โBut Margaret never betrayed her friends. Thatโs honour. She was spoiled, troubled, complex, demanding, infuriating, beautiful, stylish, silly, generous, vain, bloody-minded, very funny and brave. I love her for all of it. Sheโs an icon.โ
A Very British Scandal streams on Amazon Prime Video on April 22. The Duchess Who Dared by Charles Castle, Swift Press, is on sale now.
You can read this story and many others in the April issue of The Australian Womenโs Weekly โ on sale now
