Duchess Meghan has defended her five friends whoโve also become embroiled in her legal battle against the Mail on Sunday.
The royal is currently suing Associated Newspapers, who publish Mail Online and Mail on Sunday, over specific articles they published about her, including one revealing a personal letter she wrote to her estranged father, Thomas Markle, in 2018.
In an incredibly rare move, Meghan shared a statement in response to the threat of the Mail publishing the names of five of Meghanโs friends who later came forward anonymously to PEOPLE in defence of their royal friend.
Providing a witness statement thatโs since been revealed, Meghan explains: โAssociated Newspapers, the owner of The Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday, is threatening to publish the names of five women โ five private citizens โ who made a choice on their own to speak anonymously with a US media outlet more than a year ago, to defend me from the bullying behaviour of Britainโs tabloid media.โ
She continued: โThese five women are not on trial, and nor am I. The publisher of the Mail on Sunday is the one on trial.โ

Meghan shared an incredibly rare statement in defence of her friends.
(Getty)The Duchess also explained how the publisher โacted unlawfully and is attempting to evade accountabilityโ.
She claimed this was โto create a circus and distract from the point of this case โ that the Mail on Sunday unlawfully published my private letterโ.

The Duchess claimed the publisher was โattempting to evade accountabilityโ.
(Getty)โEach of these women is a private citizen, young mother, and each has a basic right to privacy,โ Meghan continued.
โBoth the Mail on Sunday and the court system have their names on a confidential schedule, but for the Mail on Sunday to expose them in the public domain for no reason other than clickbait and commercial gain is vicious and poses a threat to their emotional and mental wellbeing.โ
Ending the statement, Meghan had one simple request: โI respectfully ask the court to treat this legal matter with the sensitivity it deserves, and to prevent the publisher of the Mail on Sunday from breaking precedent and abusing the legal process by identifying these anonymous individuals โ a privilege that these newspapers in fact rely upon to protect their own unnamed sources.โ
WATCH: Meghan Markle admits sheโs โnot okayโ amid media scrutiny:
In response to Meghanโs statement, a Mail on Sunday spokesperson also came forward, stating: โTo set the record straight, The Mail on Sunday had absolutely no intention of publishing the identities of the five friends this weekend.โ
They continued: โBut their evidence is at the heart of the case and we see no reason why their identities should be kept secret. That is why we told the Duchessโs lawyers last week that the question of their confidentiality should be properly considered by the court.โ
New evidence was released earlier this month as the court battle continues, with evidence from Meghan stating she felt โtremendous emotional distress and damage to her mental healthโ.
โAs her friends had never seen her in this state before, they were rightly concerned for her welfare, specifically as she was pregnant, unprotected by the Institution, and prohibited from defending herself.โ
It also delved into her feelings while she was pregnant and being constantly scrutinised, stating that she felt โunprotected by the Institutionโ.
The court case continues.