Advertisement
Home Page 4878

My wonderful daughter Emily Seebohm

Emily Seebohm is one of Australia’s most promising Olympic medal prospects, but she’ll always be a cheeky little girl to her mum Karen.

Here, Karen shares her favourite pictures of her superstar daughter.

“Being Em’s mum is incredible,” Karen says. “She’s had to sacrifice a lot to follow her dreams. For six or seven years, we’ve been getting up at 4.20am because Emily’s in the pool at 5am, every day.

“But no matter whether she comes first or last, she’ll always be a fantastic person to me.”

Read our interview with Karen Seebohm here.

Emily as a young swimmer and with her medal at the FINA World Championships in 2009.

Emily started swimming as a baby and always had a fierce competitive streak.

Emily’s mum Karen noticed her daughter had serious talent when she was 12 years old.

Emily, Karen, two of the three Seebohm sons and their dogs.

Emily with two of her brothers in their Brisbane home.

Karen says being Emily’s mum is “inspirational”.

Emily lives in the family home with her beloved dogs.

Emily at the Commonwealth Games in 2010.

Emily with her gold medal for 100m backstroke at the Commonwealth Games.

Looking glam at the Swimmer of the Year Awards in December 2011.

An official swim team portrait in 2010.

Emily at the Swimmer of the Year Awards in 2010.

Emily Seebohm with her gold medal-winning team at the Commonwealth Games in 2010.

Emily with her bronze medal at the FINA World Championships in 2009.

Emily with her gold medal-winning medley team at the Beijing Olympics in 2008.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

Key pieces to add to you winter wardrobe

Leather and Lace – Celebrity style

This trend has carried on from last year, so the great news is you can recycle all of your last season pieces.

However, if you need to update the leather and lace pieces in your wardrobe – take inspiration from Jessica Alba.

Leather and Lace – What to buy

Ally Dress, available at Westfield, RRP – $39.95

OR

Sportsgirl skirt, available at Westfield,RRP – $69.95.

Coloured pants – Celebrity Style

Kate Middleton and Ellen Pompay have got this trend right!

They both team basic colours with a bright pant, adding a pop of colour to a usually dark winter wardrobe.

Coloured pants – what to buy

Dotti pants available at Westfield, RRP – $69.95.

60s Style – Celebrity style

Victoria Beckham is the perfect celebrity to follow if you love the 60s shift dress trend.

60s style – what to buy

Dress by Witchery, available at Westfield, RRP $149.95.

Short, big necklaces – celebrity style

This season necklaces are shorter and bigger, rather than longer and smaller.

Copy Heidi Klum’s style with her Turquoise necklace look at the 2012 Golden Globes.

Short, big necklaces – what to buy

Necklace by Diva, available at Westfield, RRP $34.99.

burgundy and faux fur – celebrity style

Burgundy is the colour to be seen in this season, and the best way to compliment it is with a faux fur vest.

Take inspiration from Kim Kardashian’s look.

burgundy and faux fur – what to buy

Gussto boots by Betts, available at Westfield, $99.99

AND

Jeanswest Faux Fur vest, available at Westfield, RRP, $59.99.

Little navy dress – Celebrity style

Beyonce knows how to rock the little navy dress, which is a refreshing swap from the little black dress.

Little Navy dress what to buy

Navy blue dress by Jackie E, available at Westfield, RRP $59.95.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

Act like a lady, think like a man

Act like a lady, think like a man

American comedian Steve Harvey’s dating guide Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man has become an overnight sensation in the US. But can his advice help Australia women find love? Fiona Tuite finds out.

Should I call him? Do you think he likes me? Could he be the one?

The road to true love is hardly ever smooth and can seem damn near impossible after divorce or a bad break-up.

With so much anxiety surrounding the search for romance, it’s not surprising we’re increasingly looking for help where we didn’t dare seek it before — in the pages of self-help books.

American comedian Steve Harvey shot to the top of the New York Times bestsellers list with his relationships manual, Act like a Lady, Think like a Man.

The tome proved so popular it was recently adapted into a movie — titled Think Like a Man — that has been a surprise smash hit in the US.

Harvey says he wrote the book with his children in mind. He appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show and was praised for the straight-forward advice he offered women who were making so many mistakes when it came to finding love.

But can his wisdom be applied in Australia? Local dating and relationship expert Katia Loisel-Furey says it can; as long as you remember that Aussie men tend to be more relaxed about the ‘dating’ concept.

A prime example: Harvey suggests asking men about their goals, what their relationship views are, and what they think about you, but Loisel-Furey believes this could be too much for our Aussie men.

“Hitting him with a list of twenty questions on the first date can be a major turn off and is likely to send him running a mile,” she says.

“It’s a first date, not the Spanish inquisition so relax, have fun, and let the sparks fly and if the date’s a dud, put it down to practice.”

One thing Loisel-Furey and Harvey emphatically agree upon is that if a man wants to be in a relationship with you, he will make a concrete plan to physically see you.

“It’s simple, if a guy is attracted to you or wants a relationship with you, wild horses couldn’t keep him away,” Harvey says.

“So if he’s too busy to see you, and his only contact with you is via text or email, you’re just a bit of fun and he doesn’t see you as long term potential.”

Loisel-Furey also warns against spending too much time chatting online or via texts, saying it can ruin the chances of relationship success before you’ve even met in person.

Loisel-Furey says, “In our digital world of text messaging, chat and email, it’s all too easy to fantasise about what you think, or hope, your date will be like, and get emotionally attached or jump into premature intimacy with someone you’ve never met.

“You will be bitterly disappointed when the real life version doesn’t quite stack up. The longer you ‘chat’ online or by text without meeting up, the more likely it is that your imagination will create someone who simply can’t exist.

“Nothing compares to face-to-face contact for connecting with someone and judging whether there’s any chemistry.”

Both Harvey and Loisel-Furey also agree on the importance of being genuine.

“Don’t settle,” Loisel-Furey says. “Nothing screams I need a man, and any man will do, like a woman who settles for second best.

“If he doesn’t call when he says he will, only wants to see you when he’s got nothing better on offer, doesn’t include you in his life, and isn’t interested in yours, move on. You deserve better.”

Loisel-Furey’s tips for dating are:

Don’t play too hard to get.

Letting him chase you is one thing, but a lot of women play so hard to get that they scare guys away. In reality, most men would rather do twenty rounds in a boxing ring than risk being rejected. Do a mental checklist of your body language and ask yourself, “Would I approach me?” If the answer is no, change it. For an instant confidence boost, uncross your arms and legs, pull your shoulders back, breathe, make eye contact and smile.

Know what you want but don’t come on too strong.You shouldn’t settle for a guy who’s not right for you, or isn’t in to you. You need to have standards and know what you’re looking for in a man and a relationship, but you don’t need to lay it all out on the table during the first date.

Relax and have fun.

You are dating, not going for a job interview. It’s perfectly natural to feel nervous around someone you like, but don’t let your nerves stop you from finding love.

You can’t change a man… and you shouldn’t change yourself.

Take off your rose-coloured glasses and see your date for what they are, not what you’d like them to be. Don’t try to change a man to make it work and don’t change the way you behave either. Bending over backwards isn’t a recipe for a successful relationship.

Above all, just remember that everyone — no matter how old, thin, confident or attractive — is just as nervous as you are.

“The truth is that whether you’re a guy or a girl, dating is daunting and what we all want, and fear, is not finding the same thing — love,” Loisel-Fureys says.

Your say: What are your own tips for dating in this modern world? Have you made any mistakes that you have learnt from? [email protected]

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

Did Tussauds give the queen extra wrinkles?

Madame Tussauds has a history of being kind to the royal family – the most recent waxwork of Prince William sports a suspiciously full head of hair – but it appears the queen has been given the opposite treatment.

The new $230,000 wax figure of Her Majesty has perfectly captured the monarch’s silver hair and regal demeanour, but given her face more wrinkles than it has in real life.

Despite this, the waxwork is an excellent likeness. It stands next to a youthful Prince Philip, who has not been updated since 2001, and new waxworks of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.

The real queen, right, looks considerably fresher-faced than the new waxwork, left.

The new figurine is dressed in a replica of the queen’s white silk State Dress.

This is the 23rd waxwork to be created during the queen’s 60-year reign.

The queen stands next to a waxwork of Prince Philip which was last updated in 2001.

The waxwork wears the State Diadem, a circlet of diamonds created in 1820.

The figure stands near new waxworks of Prince William and Catherine.

The real queen looked more youthful at the State Opening of Parliament last week.

The last waxwork of the queen, created in 2001, was much less lifelike.

This waxwork from 1977 looks nothing like the monarch.

New waxworks of William and Catherine (left) and the real thing (right).

William and Catherine as they appeared in Los Angeles last July.

The wax figures of William and Catherine are extremely lifelike.

The royal couple stand near a 1980s version of William’s mother Diana.

A Madame Tussauds employee puts the finishing touches on the waxworks.

A 2007 waxwork of Charles, Camilla, William and Harry stands nearby.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

Why I left my terminally ill wife

Why I left my terminally ill wife

Image: Thinkstock, posed by models

When Nic became ill I was the only person who took her seriously. Even her mum and sister thought she was exaggerating and her symptoms were so vague our doctor quickly ran out of patience.

When we’d married I came out of the army into a good job so money was never an issue and we were happy. I worked long days after our first son was born but Nic was really keen to be at home with the children and she did a great job, supervising homework, taking them to sports and organising big parties or barbecues for us at the weekend.

That first year of Nic’s illness we were still a team – I went to the unsympathetic doctor with her and demanded more tests. It was a terrible shock when she was diagnosed with a very rare cancer as she’d had it so long the treatment was drastic. Everyone rallied round and I think some felt very guilty for not believing Nic at the beginning.

At first she was relieved to have been diagnosed but then she got really angry and lost faith in the doctors, although she went through all the treatment recommended. She spent hours researching obscure treatments and suddenly announced that she was going to the US for a holistic cure costing thousands of dollars which her parents would pay for. I got time off work, our mums looked after the kids and her sister and I went with her to America to try an untested cure based on drinking herbs. I came home after three weeks to work and be with the kids, who were between five and 11 in age at the time. They were thrilled when Nic came home five weeks later.

The cancer was in remission but Nic was still obsessed with eating organic, drinking these noxious herbal concoctions and fighting with me over everything. She told everyone I wasn’t helping her as I found out when my sister asked me why I wasn’t being supportive. We had a cleaner, all the washing and ironing done and a local catering company supplying dinner every night, but Nic told everyone I expected her to get on with everything herself. I thought she was so distressed she didn’t really know what she was saying so I took her away for a weekend to try and sort things out, which turned into a disaster.

She said I’d stifled her creatively by making her give up work and that I had no idea of the anguish she was going through. I said I’d do anything to help her feel better but she said she wanted me to be ill instead of her as children shouldn’t lose their mother. Over the next two years she spent most of her time with her girlfriends and nothing I did was right.

I was also worried sick about the kids since we had become so distant so I told Nic I wanted us to have counselling or I was leaving. She just shrugged, totally distant and uncaring. I left for six months and saw the children every weekend until Nic’s sister told me the cancer was now terminal. I was shattered and moved back the same day, really trying to help Nic but it was too late. We were polite, the children were glad we were together, but over the next year we never reconnected.

Chemo gave her some time with the children and I had months of compassionate leave so we were together as a family and that was good for the children. She said I was a good dad so she wouldn’t worry about the children and I said I still loved her but she bitterly repeated her wish that I was ill instead of her. When she died three years ago I tried to make everything right for my children.

It was a terrible thing to happen to someone so young but I still don’t know why she blamed me and I can’t let the kids know how hard she was to live with. I said I left because I was a coward but came back because I still loved her and she forgave me so we’re very close but my sister’s my only friend. Even my parents are upset with me and although her friends keep in touch with our children I’m the unwanted extra. Guys who were friends nod at me at sports and we get invited to family functions but no-one goes beyond a cool greeting and I’m never invited anywhere alone.

I can’t explain that cancer turned Nic into a self obsessed tyrant, though if I’d thought she was going to die I would have stuck it out. What would all those people who judge me so harshly have done in my place?

Your say: Have you had a similar experience? Share your stories and thoughts below.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

Author claims Michelle Obama is shunning Oprah because she’s ‘fat’

Author claims Michelle Obama is shunning Oprah because she's 'fat'

Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey.

Michelle Obama is shunning Oprah Winfrey because she hates “fat people”, according to a controversial new book.

The sensational claims appear in The Amateur, a new book about Barack Obama’s presidency written by Edward Klein, the former editor-in-chief of New York Times Magazine.

Klein says Michelle avoids Oprah’s phone calls and refused to let her get involved with her national campaign against childhood obesity because she thought the talk show queen was too fat to give nutritional advice.

“Oprah, with her yo-yo dieting and huge girth, is a terrible role model,” Michelle is quoted as telling a staff member. “Kids will look at Oprah, who’s rich and famous and huge, and figure it’s okay to be fat.”

Related: Michelle Obama – In love with a president

Oprah was reportedly furious with Michelle’s remarks, and told her long-time friend Gayle King: “Michelle hates fat people and doesn’t want me waddling around the White House!”

Klein claims Michelle’s relationship with Oprah began to sour just weeks after Barack won the 2008 US presidential elections and has got steadily worst over the years.

“Michelle is furious that her husband makes late-night calls to Oprah, seeking ideas on how to improve his sinking popularity,” Klein writes. “Michelle thinks he should turn to her, not Oprah, for that kind of advice.”

But if Klein is to be believed, Michelle’s jealousy doesn’t stop with Oprah. The First Lady is reportedly paranoid Barack will cheat on her, so goes to great lengths to ensure he doesn’t have any opportunities for infidelity.

Michelle reportedly has a habit of showing up at Barack’s office unannounced to check he is there, and of having friends and staff watch women the president shows any interest in.

“Michelle is very jealous, I would say unusually so,” a source told Klein. “Most people after years of marriage have trust and don’t follow their husbands around and check on them.

“Michelle doesn’t seem to trust Barack at all. She insists on knowing his every movement and drops in on him at all kinds of odd times.

“Michelle makes it clear to her inner circle…that she wants women around Barack watched and wants info about who he has an eye for and gets touchy with.”

In pictures: Barack Obama’s girls

Klein’s claims are at odds with Michelle and Barack’s public image. The couple appear to be extremely happy and secure in their relationship and are often photographed hugging and kissing.

Likewise, Michelle and Oprah appear to be excellent friends, with the First Lady chatting animatedly with her at public events and appearing on The Oprah Winfrey Show last year.

Your say: Do you think authors should stop writing salacious books about respected public figures like the Obamas and the royal family?

Video: Michelle Obama wows with her push-up skills

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

How Twitter is saving TV

How Twitter is saving TV

The Voice judges Keith Urban, Delta Goodrem, Seal and Joel Madden.

As Seal, Joel et al were warming up their vocal chords for The Voice’s live show on Monday night the Twitterati were warming up their thumbs, perhaps unaware that they were about to join one of the most successful social media campaigns in Australian history.

Tweets boasting the show’s hash tag (#TheVoiceAU) were already starting to fly back and forth long before its 7.30pm start, with the more socially engaged of the shows 2.2 million viewers warming up for a night of heavy Tweeting.

Related: The best performances on The Voice

The Voice wasn’t their only engagement; there was #masterchef, #theblock, #mediawatch, and #qanda, and all in real time! Pleas for multiple screens, devices, and hand massages were beginning to flood the Twitter feed.

Of course, they were joking. Twitter devotees like nothing more than sharing their views on a night of quality television with thousands of like-minded viewers, while longing for re-tweets, new followers, and, the Holy Grail: a Tweet published on TV.

If video was enough to kill the radio star then TiVo, YouTube and IQ, should have been able to kill off free-to-air TV. Instead, TV programs are embracing new media, the social kind, and using it as their greatest weapon.

The Voice has been the most successful of them all. It is proving that watching TV is no longer just about watching TV. It’s social TV — it’s about getting involved in the conversation.

“People want to be participants rather than just viewers, and to participate you have to switch on the TV, which is good news for the networks,” says social media guru Tommy Tudehope.

In an age where piracy, YouTube channels, on-demand video, and recording devices like Foxtel iQ allow viewers to watch their favourite programs at their leisure — threatening ratings — programs are, more strategically than we realise, using Twitter to get their viewers back on the couch and making us watch our favourite shows when the networks tell us to.

Of course, they’re doing this with differing degrees of success.

Masterchef has done well to attract viewers among its online foodie following, Q&A’s competitive snarky tweeting has been popular among politically minded Gen-Ys and media types for a while, and Lateline is experimenting with nightly “guest tweeters”.

But through driving a positive conversation and supporting that on screen, The Voice is doing it better than anyone, and it’s no doubt helping the ratings.

Attracting tens of thousands of tweets per show and trending almost as soon as the opening credits roll, it’s no accident The Voice’s social media strategy is going gangbusters. They’re following a strategy developed with the help of Twitter’s own marketing team and honed since Holland’s first incarnation of the phenomenally successful franchise.

“Twitter contributes to the ratings simply because it’s one of the platforms that keeps the buzz around the show alive and have people talk about the show,” says creator of the show’s digital bible, Sjoerd Demaret of digital agency Talpa Productions.

“Others notice there’s a lot of activity (trending) around The Voice and if they want to join the conversation they need to know what they’re talking about… meaning they have to watch the show.”

And if Twitter can’t be completely credited with saving ratings, at least it’s helping the industry in creating jobs. Congratulations Fuzzy, The Voice’s social media host whose role it is to monitor tweets, read them out, and remind us to keep them coming.

In pictures: Keith Urban’s amazing transformation

Demaret is also quick to point out we haven’t yet reached the final destination of online integration and TV. With second screens, in-screen tweeting, and user-controlled scrolling feeds on the way, TV is about to become a whole lot more social. Viewers are going to have to get used to multi-tasking, that groove in your couch is going to get that little bit more worn in, and the networks are breathing a sigh of relief.

Elizabeth Burke is The Weekly’s youngest writer. Click here to follow her on Twitter and here to follow The Weekly.

Your say: Do you use social media to discuss your favourite TV shows?

Video: What is pinterest?

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

How your place in the family rules your life

How your place in the family rules your life

First-born? Piggy in the middle? Or always the baby? Clinical psychologist Linda Blair reveals how birth order in the family can affect every aspect of your life.

From the moment you first draw breath, a number of factors are at work to shape your character. Unravelling all of them would be a major undertaking. However, there is one tantalisingly simple means of developing a profound understanding of yourself and other people – and it all comes down to the position you hold in your family.

Birth order, put into its proper context, is the key that can unlock personalities and give you a new perspective on human nature. This applies even to someone you’ve just met.Knowing whether a person is the eldest, youngest, middle or only child means you can instantly make a great number of correct guesses about the way the person behaves, thinks and feels.

But understanding the effects of birth order (or, if you are adopted, your place in the family) will also give you a new insight into your own personality. Having older or younger siblings, for example – or being an only child – exercises a profound influence on our emotions, outlook and behaviour.

After working as a clinical psychologist for 25 years, I’ve seen how these factors affect every aspect of our lives, from our careers to our relationships. So, let’s take a closer look at the various birth order positions. Depending on where you fit into your family, you’ll recognise many of the characteristics here as your own.

THE FIRST-BORN

Thirsty for approval

When you were a baby, you enjoyed the exclusive attention of your parents. However, probably within the first four years of your life, you had to start sharing this attention with a new child. That means you experienced the loss of your parents’ undivided focus before your own sense of security was firmly established.

As a result, your thirst for approval will probably always feel as if it can’t be quenched. In other words, no matter how much praise or adoration you receive, you’re likely to find yourself wanting more.

Another common consequence of losing some of your parents’ attention is to widen your search for adult praise and approval. Before long, you want to please anyone who occupies a position of power – because anyone in power is, in effect, a parental figure.

You will also remain liable to feeling easily hurt by any criticism levelled at you by an authority figure. Why? Because a criticism can feel like a rejection – so it’s likely to trigger your underlying anxiety about being supplanted by someone else.

Law-abiding and conservative

If you’re keen to please those in authority, it follows you’ll accept the rules they’ve set and identify with their values. You’re less likely to break the law. You also tend to be conservative in your outlook, sticking with what you know rather than taking chances with new schemes and ideas.

Keen to be in charge

Not only do you admire those in power, but you may well want to assume power yourself. Indeed, a disproportionate number of first-borns are in leadership positions. For example, more presidents, prime ministers and company chief executives have been first-borns than would be expected statistically.

Academically successful

You’re a good student: you do your homework and generally accept what authority figures tell you. Primarily, you are driven by the desire to please your parents and teachers (though you may later become fascinated by a subject in its own right). Another reason first-borns do well at school is that they tend to have superior language skills – a result of the extra attention you had from your parents before your siblings arrived.

Organised and responsible

As a first-born, you’ve watched your parents and other carers look after your younger siblings. No doubt you were also given opportunities to help out. All this practice and observation has not only made you nurturing and caring, but also given you organisational skills that make others want to put you in control. Furthermore, because you’re used to expecting that others will need your help, you’re usually the first person to volunteer when there is work to be done.

Self-critical

Your deep-seated fear of rejection means you dread failure. And because you ask so much of yourself, you’re less likely to forgive yourself when you don’t manage to do what’s expected. This tendency towards harsh self-criticism is particularly true if the sibling who comes next was born quite soon after you – that is, before you lost the belief that you were responsible for everything that happened in your life.

All children think in this way when they are very young: until they are about four or five, their first reaction when things go wrong is to assume responsibility. So although your memories of your sibling’s arrival may be hazy, you probably concluded then that your parents preferred the new baby because you were now less likeable.Many first-borns never lose this tendency to feel guilty or overly responsible when things go wrong.

Bad at delegating

You find it hard to delegate responsibility even if you’re overloaded and stressed. You instead prefer to stay in control. Indeed, you are afraid that if you lose that control, things may go wrong and that if they do, you will only have yourself to blame.

More likely to seek help

You are prone to suffering from anxiety and, in particular, feelings of insecurity and jealousy. This is partly because your parents were novices when you arrived. Babies are acutely sensitive to people’s moods, so there is a good chance that you were aware of their nervousness. Your anxiety is also a result of losing their exclusive focus on you while you were still very young. Feelings of displacement make a deep impression. How strong and lasting your problems will be depends on your temperament and how your parents handled the arrival of your new sibling. Consequently, you’re more likely to seek psychological help – not least because you tend to turn towards authority figures (such as a GP or psychologist) when you’re in distress.

THE MIDDLE-BORN

For families of more than three children, all those in between the first and last-born fall into this category. If the gap between you and the next child is more than three years, you will probably have some qualities that are typical of both a middle and a last-born.

Relaxed

By the time you came along, your parents were more relaxed and confident about what they were doing, so you were doubtless treated in a more matter-of-fact manner. This means you’re likely to be less of a worrier than your older sibling.

Diplomatic

You’re the co-operator and diplomat of the family. You manage to get on well with most people and to fit into any group, classroom or office. Above all, you are very sensitive to the needs and feelings of those around you

When others get locked into arguments, you are likely to be the one who tries to think of a way to sort things out. After all, that was your role more often than not in childhood. Sandwiched between younger and older siblings who wanted things done their own way, you tended to be the one to propose a compromise. Quite often, however, that compromise was at your own expense.

Easily persuaded

Having grown up surrounded by older and younger siblings, you have always gravitated toward people who are roughly your own age. So you are very sociable and attuned to your peers. However, you can be inclined simply to follow the crowd – and if your friends are trying to challenge authority or make mischief, that trait may land you in trouble.

Realistic

When you hung around with children the same age, you tended to compare yourself to them. As a result, the expectations you had for yourself were likely to be roughly appropriate for your stage of development. Even as a grown-up, you tend to remain realistic about your own talents and abilities.

Creative and sporty

Middle-borns nearly always focus their energies in areas where the first-born hasn’t been particularly successful. Look at it this way: your older and more capable sibling probably cornered the most common way of gaining parental approval – working hard at school – so you had to think of something else. The second choices most likely to please parents are sport and the arts. So the likelihood is that you channelled your interest into one or the other – or both.

First to leave home

It’s not clear why, but most middle-borns fly the nest relatively earlier than their siblings. Perhaps it is because you grew tired of always compromising and standing aside for the sake of others. Maybe you simply yielded to the youthful spirit of adventure because you were confident you could get along almost anywhere.

Champion of the underdog

Middle-borns put a lot of effort into keeping the social wheels greased. This is wonderful for everyone else, but, for you, there’s a cost. In the interests of social harmony, you are less likely to pay attention to your own needs and wishes. You may not even be sure what they are. Children who have had less time alone with their parents sometimes give up on their dreams because they feel the odds of realising them are small.

If you continually repress your own desires, they are pushed out of your mind. A sense of frustration remains, but you’re more likely to channel it into helping other people. Typically, you will single out a person or a group and assume that they’re troubled by the same problems as you are.

Whether you’re conscious of it or not, what you are saying is, in effect: “We all deserve equal treatment. I’m not going to overlook someone just because they’re not crying out for their needs to be met. I’m going to help them – just as I would have liked to be noticed and helped.”

Unconventional appearance

You’ve probably always had to be innovative to find ways of holding your parents’ attention. This may be why you are the one in the family who is most likely to dress bizarrely, to sport extreme hairstyles or wear unusual make-up – particularly during your teenage years. It’s the middle-born’s way of saying: “Hey, look at me! Come on, notice me!”

Lack of direction

Statistically, middle-borns are the least likely to seek psychological help. When they do, though, they most often have symptoms of depression or anxiety – such as tiredness, a lack of direction, panicky feelings and a sense of gloom about the future. Usually, my work with these middle-borns centres on helping them to discover their own passions and talents, as well as encouraging them to follow their dreams.

THE LAST-BORN

Dependent

Your parents probably decided before you were born that you would be their last child. Even so, they were likely to have feelings of nostalgia and regret. So, each of your “first” milestones became a significant “last time” for them. And because they weren’t quite ready to give up the parenting role, they tended to reward you when your behaviour was dependent or immature.

On top of this, you benefited from having more family members on hand to help you out whenever you asked, which means you probably never had to struggle with a problem on your own for very long. Plus, no new brother or sister ever came along to take away your role as the “baby” of the family. So you never really had any reason to give up you dependent, childish ways.

Outgoing and charming

Last-borns tend to be sociable creatures who enjoy being the centre of attention. It’s easy to understand why. Your older siblings captured your parents’ attention by being more mature and showing how well they could learn new skills. So you had to find another attractive way to shine.What you discovered is that attention-seeking antics play very well, particularly with parents who are already encouraging you to prolong your babyish behaviour.

Manipulative

Parents often deal with their last-born in an ambivalent manner. They want their youngest to be baby-like and sweet, yet not too much of a bother.This confusing message often causes the last-born to progress from behaving in a pleasantly attention-seeking way to becoming frustrated and manipulative.

Rather than become mature, the child learns how to “turn on the charm”. In its extreme form, this charm becomes outright manipulation. At that point, it is no longer attractive because it makes everyone around the manipulator feel overwhelmed and trapped.

Disorganised

Because you focus so much of your attention on what others can do for you, you are less likely to set goals for yourself. Furthermore, because you expect others to sort you out, you may never take the time to stop periodically to think about what you are doing. As a result, you quite often appear undirected or even chaotic.

Creative and innovative

Being disorganised isn’t all bad – in fact, it’s linked with creativity. Without carefully constructed plans, we’re often more open to new and different ways of thinking.The reason you have a tendency to be innovative and creative is that, as a child, you had no choice but to break new ground in the battle for your parents’ attention.

Rebellious

Risk-taker

Children will naturally test the limits set for them. Parents, though, tend to relax the boundaries with each successive child – which means that the last-born will have the least limits and therefore be liable to take the riskiest options.

Low self-esteem

During your childhood, everyone else in your family was bigger, stronger and more competent than you. After all, they had a head start. So when you compare yourself to your siblings, you are liable to feel inferior – or at least less competent. You are also in danger of concluding that it’s not worth trying to do things for yourself.

The longer people are taken care of – rather than encouraged to care for themselves – the higher the chance that they will feel let down by others in later life. This is a danger for last-borns. You grew up with an expectation that other people, particularly parental figures, would automatically “know” what you wanted and be keen to provide it.

But when you began to mix with your peers, you may have been surprised and even hurt to discover that they expected a more even-handed relationship. Thus you were left feeling let down and disappointed.A dangerous consequence of this is that, in adulthood, you may start blaming everyone else when things don’t go your way.

THE ONLY CHILD

Most single children are born to parents who choose to have a one-child family. If, however, your parents were desperate to have a large family, they’re likely to have spoiled and over-protected you. In adulthood, this may lead you to be perpetually dissatisfied and always expecting others to do everything for you.

Academically successful

Like first-borns, you tend to do well at school because you are used to interacting with adults and can express yourself clearly.Also, because you don’t have any siblings, you are less likely to have suffered from anxious or jealous feelings – both of which can interfere with concentration and memory.

Self-confident

Barring any destabilising event – such as divorce or loss of a parent – only children are unlikely to lose the fond and exclusive attention of either parent. Quite the contrary, you are often showered with love and approval. Therefore, you almost certainly developed a healthy level of self-confidence. If you had too much praise, though, it may have led to you feeling pressured.

And, if your mother and father focused too much attention on you, then you may have felt over-protected and trapped, as though you were living for them rather than for yourself. In my own clinical experience, though, most parents of singles seem to get the balance right and raise confident, assertive individuals.

Happy alone

Unlike children with siblings, you are used to finding ways of entertaining yourself. This can be a great plus because you are less prone than others to feel anxious if no one is around.

Logical and organised

Unlike children, most grown-ups know when it is advisable to repress their emotions and behave logically. Having grown up around adults, you learned this lesson early. After all, you never had to put up with siblings who threw tantrums or stirred up negative emotions – such as jealousy or anxiety. Your sensible, unemotional problem-solving skills were likely, therefore, to develop powerfully. You are probably good at planning ahead, making lists and organising yourself, and so you are also very often asked to take on positions of responsibility because of this.

Not street-smart

Although parents of single children usually make enormous efforts to provide their child with opportunities to socialise with their peers, these sessions are likely to be planned, time-limited and supervised by adults.The downside is that you seldom learn how to establish your “territory” – to stand up for yourself diplomatically and to find ways of sharing limited toys and space.

So singles often miss out entirely on opportunities to develop “street-smart” skills – whereas children with siblings learn to speed-read other people’s desires and intended actions (and to take advantage of that knowledge). Consequently, you are more likely than others to behave in ways that lead to misunderstandings. You can also feel distanced from your peers and awkward when you try to join in group activities.

Perfectionist

As a child, you tended to set your own standards in relation to adults. This means that you will almost certainly shoot high and expect a great deal of yourself.There is nothing wrong with that, but it’s also important to know how and when to relax to avoid problems. Otherwise, the perfectionist only-child will be prone to burnout and other disorders.

Afraid of disorder

In larger families, someone is always knocking over someone else’s carefully arranged set of blocks, so siblings have plenty of opportunities to figure out what to do when things go wrong and then mediate among themselves.

That wasn’t the case for you. When you had a problem, there was usually an adult to help you to sort it out. So you probably grew up with little experience of how to cope with disorder and confusion. Therefore, you can appear to be impatient or demanding when things don’t go according to your plan. In fact, my clinicial experience suggests that only children are also more prone than others to obsessive behaviour – the need to keep everything precisely in order.

Copyright 2011 Linda Blair, extracted from Birth Order: What Your Position In The Family Really Tells You About Your Character by Linda Blair, published by Piatkus, $35.

Your say: Do you think all only children are perfectionists?

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

William and Kate’s puppy steals the show

The world might be waiting for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to have a baby but for now, the royal couple are giving all their love to their puppy.

Catherine took six-month-old cocker spaniel Lupo to watch William and Harry play polo at Ascot yesterday.

The duchess – who looked lovely in a green silk shift and towering wedges – couldn’t stop cuddling the playful pup and William wasn’t much better.

Even Prince Harry showed his affection for the pooch, running over to give him a big kiss as William and Catherine laughed.

William and Catherine showered their new puppy with love.

Catherine wore a green silk dress by British label Libelula.

Lupo even earned himself a kiss from Prince Harry.

William played with Lupo during breaks from the game.

Lupo seemed like a handful as he played with William.

William and Catherine seemed relaxed and happy in each other’s company.

The couple couldn’t stop laughing at their pet puppy.

William is believed to have bought Lupo as a birthday present for Catherine.

Catherine seemed to enjoy showing Lupo around the polo ground.

The windy weather proved tricky for Catherine’s dress.

Lupo had Catherine in stitches of laughter all day.

Catherine watching William play polo in 2006.

Catherine has been a regular at the polo since she started dating William.

Catherine and Harry’s on/off girlfriend Chelsy Davy at the polo in 2006.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4878

Kate Middleton bares her back in sheer dress

As a university student, Kate Middleton was apparently “utterly unmemorable” but as duchess, she is breathtaking.

When she stepped out of her car at London’s Royal Albert Hall on Saturday, the crowd gasped audibly before breaking into to raucous roars of approval.

The Duchess of Cambridge looked stunning in a teal Jenny Packham gown, with delicate lace sleeves and a daring sheer back.

Instead of her usual loose waves, Catherine wore her hair in an intricate chignon. She and William were attending a gala to mark the countdown to the London Olympics.

William looked thrilled to have Catherine by his side.

Catherine looked lovely in a teal Jenny Packham gown.

Catherine wore her hair up in an intricate chignon.

The duchess’ dress had a daring sheer back, adorned with tiny buttons.

Catherine’s new hairstyle complemented the dress perfectly.

The crowd roared as the royal couple walked the red carpet.

Catherine wore Jimmy Choo strappy sandals and a teal clutch.

Catherine’s makeup was also more dramatic than she usually wears.

Catherine wore another daring dress with a thigh-high split last week.

Related stories


Advertisement