Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Are additives bad for us?

Are additives bad for us?

Additives and preservatives have their place, but many of these “chemical culprits” have far-reaching effects on the health of adults and children alike. Karen Inge tells us why some foods we eat are a recipe for disaster.

Do food additives worry you? If yes, you’re not alone. Many Australians believe that additives such as preservatives are harmful to our health and that artificial colours cause behavioural and learning difficulties, such as ADHD. Yet the truth is while some adults and children are sensitive to food additives and will experience mild to severe side effects, most of us won’t.

As a general rule of thumb, the ones most likely to cause problems are those that are not essential. They “dress up” the food to make it more appealing, such as artificial colours, flavour enhancers and some preservatives. And the number of processed foods without these “chemical culprits” is growing significantly.

So, why were they added and what do they mean for your family’s health and wellbeing?

What is a food additive?

Food additives are substances added to foods to keep them fresh, preserve their flavour or enhance their colour, taste, texture or appearance. They can extend shelf life and, in some cases, improve nutritional value and ensure food is safe to eat.

Food additives are chemical substances, some made artificially in laboratories, such as artificial colours and flavours. Others are derived from nature, such as cochineal (120), the red dye from an insect, or extracted from a food such as lecithin (322) from egg yolk, or the thickener (410) derived from the locust bean. Yet just because an additive is “natural” it doesn’t mean it won’t cause problems for food-sensitive people.

Related: Additives and hyperactivity

What do additives do?

Here are the most common additives and their functions:

  • Anti-caking agents stop ingredients from becoming lumpy.

  • Anti-oxidants prevent foods from oxidising or going rancid.

  • Artificial sweeteners increase the sweetness without the kilojoules.

  • Emulsifiers/stabilisers ensure that oil and water mixtures (such as dressings) do not separate into layers, plus they stop fats clotting together.

  • Food acids maintain the right acid level, important for taste and controlling bugs.

  • Colours enhance or add colour. These are not really necessary and can cause problems, especially behavioural, when consumed in large amounts.

  • Humectants prevent foods from drying out.

  • Flavours restore losses during processing and make food taste better.

  • Flavour enhancers improve the existing flavour and/or aroma.

  • Mineral salts enhance texture.

  • Preservatives stop microbes from multiplying and spoiling the food.

  • Thickeners enhance texture.

  • Stabilisers help stop ingredients from separating.

  • Flour treatment improves baking quality.

  • Glazing agent improves appearance and can protect food.

  • Propellants help propel food from a container.

The Australian Food Standards Code requires food labels to list all ingredients in descending order by weight, including food additives. They must be identified by their class name and an individual name, such as flavour enhancer (monosodium glutamate), or, for simplicity, a code number can be used, such as flavour enhancer (621).

Are food additives safe?

Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and bodies overseas ensure additives are safe, rigorously animal testing to determine the safe level for humans. Usually this is 100 times less than the maximum, where “no observable effects” are produced by an additive consumed over the test animal’s lifetime. If there is any doubt over safety, approval is not given and, if new scientific information suggests that a food additive is no longer safe, the approval for that additive is withdrawn.

While this is reassuring for the majority of us, it doesn’t help those who are food-chemical sensitive because, in some cases, even small amounts of the offending chemical can cause upset.

Reactions to food additives

For most people, the majority of additives are not a problem. However, 50 of the 400 currently approved additives in Australia have been associated with adverse reactions in some people. These reactions include:

  • Digestive disorders – diarrhoea, colicky pains.

  • Nervous disorders – insomnia, irritability.

  • Behavioural problems – ADHD.

  • Respiratory problems – asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis.

  • Skin problems – hives, itching, rashes, swelling.

To put reactions to additives in perspective, the leading cause of food allergies and intolerances are natural: milk, wheat, eggs, nuts, seafood and soy.

If you believe you have any food intolerance, then medical diagnosis is important. If you try to diagnose yourself, you may restrict your diet unnecessarily and neglect an illness. The Dietitians Association of Australia website (www.daa.asn.au) can help locate an Accredited Practising Dietitian to help and the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital’s Allergy website (www.sswahs.nsw.gov.au/rpa/allergy/) has useful information.

Related: Food Allergies

Additives to watch out for

  • Preservatives Sodium benzoate (211) is effective in reducing spoilage in acidic foods such as vinegar, salad dressing, fruit juice and soft drink. There have been some concerns about the combination of sodium benzoate and ascorbic acid (vitamin C). When the two are mixed, they can form the chemical benzene, known to be carcinogenic. However, sodium benzoate alone is not considered a carcinogen and you would have to consume large amounts of it to have toxic levels in your body.
  • Nitrates (249-252) A group of preservatives used in processed meats such as bacon, ham, salami and some sausages such as frankfurts. Nitrates are relatively harmless, but when a breakdown product of nitrates called nitrites react with the protein in meat, nitrosamines are formed and these are cancer-causing compounds that may increase the risk of stomach cancer.
  • Sulphites (220-225 and 228) These are the sulphur compounds often added to dried apricots and apples to stop them darkening, and to pickled onions, sundried tomatoes and many wines. The most common reaction to these preservatives is wheeziness, especially in asthma sufferers.
  • Flavour enhancers Monosodium glutamate (621) is added to foods such as hydrolysed vegetable protein, soy sauce, Vegemite. International scientific assessments have been conducted and none have conclusively linked MSG to asthma or the so-called “Chinese Restaurant Syndrome”. However, there are some who are sensitive to MSG and have reported headaches and wheeziness. MSG also occurs naturally in many foods.
  • Food colourings If your child is showing signs of ADHD, such as finding it hard to concentrate, can’t pay attention, is hyperactive and impulsive, they may be reacting to something in their food. Colourings and preservatives are likely culprits when it comes to boisterous behaviour, but they won’t cause ADHD, although they may make the symptoms worse, according to a recent study in The Lancet. It revealed that a strict elimination diet significantly improved ADHD symptoms in 64 per cent of the children studied and reintroducing foods made the symptoms worse again.

There is a lot of controversy surrounding the use of artificial colours in foods. In the US, UK and the EU, bans? (am checking this with Karen – Mads) and warnings have been issued about six colours that we still use in Australia: tartrazine (102), quinoline yellow (104), sunset yellow (110), carmoisine (122), ponceau 4R (124) and allura red (129).

Associate Professor Wendy Oddy, of the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth, says food additives might play a part in behavioural and emotional issues, and double the risk of having ADHD. Sweets and soft drink are high in food colourings and flavourings, so an overload of chemicals could contribute, though she suspects the main culprit may be what these teenagers [itals] aren’t [end itals] eating. What’s missing from highly processed foods – and probably crucial for brain health – are omega-3 fats and B vitamins, including folate, found in wholegrains, leafy green vegetables, legumes and some fruit.

Better food choices

We should all be trying to eat foods as close to the natural source as possible, or that are produced using methods that avoid the need for additives. Ideally, we want to eat food that is free from too many added synthetic chemical additives which serve no purpose, but are only there for visual appeal.

It is better to choose foods that include natural colours made from fruit and vegetables, such as carrot and beetroot, algae and spices such as paprika, saffron and turmeric. Beware of natural colours such as cochineal, a red dye from the cochineal insect, as some people have had allergic reactions.

Cooking from scratch means you have control over what you and your family eats. Go for fresh, frozen or canned ingredients, which don’t require additives, or organic foods because their ingredients or processing methods are free from anything artificial.

To minimise bacterial growth, you need to store your food well, either in airtight containers or in the fridge or freezer. And when you are selecting packaged or processed foods, read the labels so you know what’s in your food. Then the choice is yours.

Your say: Have you had any bad experiences with food additives? Share your experience in the comments below

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Queen ‘deeply humbled’ by jubilee spectacular

Her Majesty wore a stunning mint green embellished coat and dress.

The queen enters the Thanksgiving Service without her usual escort Prince Philip.

Philip is still in hospital receiving treatment for a bladder infection.

William and Catherine arrive at St Paul’s Cathedral.

Charles, Camilla and Harry.

Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.

Charles, Camilla, Catherine and Harry share a joke.

Zara Phillips and her husband Mike Tindall.

Princess Anne.

Prince Edward, his wife Sophie and their daughter Lady Louise.

The queen enters St Paul’s Cathedral.

William, Harry and Catherine during the service.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Mariah and twins splash out!

Can Mariah Carey and Nick Cannon‘s twins get any cuter? The super-star mum and her 13-month-old tots, Monroe and Moroccan, took to the pool together recently.

Mariah posted these adorable pictures to the DemBabies website, a site created by herself and husband Nick to display pictures of their twins. Nick also posted a pic of Moroccan wrapped up in a baby robe to his Twitter account with the caption: “Roc big pimpin in Italy!”

The twins are currently travelling the world with their mum while she completes her European tour. During the trip Nick and Mariah also renewed their vows, for the fourth time since getting married. The pair say they will continue to renew their vows every year.

Mariah with her twins in the pool.

Moroccan in his bath robe.

Two cuties in a car!

Mariah has her hands full!

Mariah cuddling Moroccan.

Mariah carefully walks with baby Monroe.

Monroe and Moroccan have certianly grown up fast!

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Facebook to allow under-13s with parental control

Facebook to allow under-13s to sign up

Children under the age of 13 will soon be able to sign up to Facebook, with the social networking site considering lifting its ban on younger users.

Facebook is said to be developing technology that will allow under-13s to create online profiles with parental supervision.

The Wall Street Journal reports the new prototype would give parents complete control over what their young children do on the site.

Related: A Facebook bully ruined my life

Parents would be able to decide who their kids become “friends” with, what applications they use and what they communicate to people.

Facebook is believed to be developing the new features to cash in on the younger generation’s fondness for online gaming.

Under-13s represent a large chunk of online gamers, but Facebook is currently unable to target the age group.

The move to allow such young children to sign up to the social network has sparked criticism, with some commentators claiming it raises dangerous privacy issues for vulnerable young people.

Facebook executives claim this argument ignores the fact that millions of under-13s are already using the site illegally, lying about their birth dates to sign up early.

A recent survey found an estimated 7.5 million Facebook users are under 13, with five million of those being under the age of 10.

Facebook argues that “formalising” the existence of young users will avoid future legal and regulatory problems for the company.

Related: What every parent needs to know about online safety

“Recent reports have highlighted just how difficult it is to enforce age restrictions on the internet, especially when parents want their children to access online content and services,” a statement from Facebook reads.

“We are in continuous dialogue with stakeholders, regulators and other policy makers about how best to help parents keep their kids safe in an evolving online environment.”

It is unsure when the new technology will be released.

Your say: Do you think children under the age of 13 should be allowed to use Facebook?

Video: Facebook depression

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Great-grandmother on getting world’s first breast implants

80-year-old talks about receiving world's first breast implants

Then and now: Timmie Jean in 1962 before the surgery and today.

Today, breast implants are one of the most popular cosmetic surgery procedures. But surprisingly, the world’s first breast implant patient, Timmie Jean Lindsey, was not concerned about the size of her chest.

In fact, following the procedure, she didn’t tell anyone about it for another 30 years.

As 2012 marks the 50th anniversary of the boob job, 80-year-old great-grandmother Timmie of Houston, Texas, looks back on her experience as the first woman to have the history changing surgery.

“I had originally gone to the doctors because I was a young, recently divorced mother and had a couple of tattoos on me that I regretted,” she told Radar online.

“I had been told not to mark my body but instead I got roses and leaves tattooed over my breasts of all places!”

Little did she know that she was being eyed off as the first woman in the world to have revolutionary silicone implants.

“Unbeknownst to me they did a lot of measuring and I remember hearing them say that I would be the perfect size — they wouldn’t be too big or too small,” she said.

The mum of six agreed to the surgery in the spring of 1962 saying that some “gentle persuasion”, by surgeons Dr Frank Gerow and Dr Thomas Cronin, talked her into increasing her B cup to a C, but on one condition.

“I had never thought about my breast size and I told them I’d rather have my ears pinned back because my brother had teased me mercilessly growing up and called me Big Ears, so they did that too,” she said.

Despite being the guinea pig for the world-first surgery, Timmie says she wasn’t at all scared and that she had complete trust in the doctors.

“They put the implants underneath my tissue against my rib cage, there was a mesh frame so my flesh could grow though it and anchor them to my chest,” she explained.

And although the surgery was a success, Timmie says she didn’t tell anyone about it for 30 years.

“No one knew. I didn’t talk about it and if I did meet someone, I only spilled the beans if they asked why my boobs were so nice. Even my grandson only found out from a story in the local newspaper when he was serving abroad,” she said.

Timmie spoke about the procedure publicly for the first time on a Houston morning show, after Dr Cronin asked her to argue in favor of implants during a health scare over silicone during the 1990s.

Today, after having her breast implants for 50 years, Timmie has no regrets about the surgery and says her implants feel natural.

“I still have them in. It feels natural as they’ve settled with age. They don’t feel too hard anymore,” she said.

“I always had a real nice shape even after all my babies. I never thought anything was wrong with my old breasts!”

And her opinion on women who take breast implants too far?

“I think women who get really big ones are just looking for attention or they are doing it to make money some way or other,” she said.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Royals rock at Diamond Jubilee concert

Queen Elizabeth II has spent 60 years putting duty above all else and last night was no exception, with the monarch cheerfully attending a pop concert to celebrate her Diamond Jubilee despite Prince Philip being taken to hospital just hours earlier.

The queen arrived at 9pm, and was met with deafening applause from the 500,000-strong crowd outside Buckingham Palace.

The monarch was joined by other senior royals including Prince Charles and Camilla, Prince William and Catherine and Prince Harry.

Prince Philip spent the evening in a nearby hospital receiving treatment for a bladder infection.

Prince Charles made a moving tribute to his mother at the event.

If the queen was worried about her husband, she didn’t show it.

William, Catherine and Harry were thrilled to be at the event.

The monarch took to the stage with the performers at the end of the concert.

William and Harry loudly sang along to all the songs.

Harry was particularly impressed with Tom Jones’s rendition of ‘Delilah’.

Catherine was wearing a Whistles dress and an Alexander McQueen blazer.

Catherine joins her husband singing along with Robbie Williams.

The queen wore earplugs throughout the concert.

Palace aides say her late arrival had nothing to do with her husband’s illness.

Kylie Minogue performing at the concert

Kylie was a big hit with the crowd.

The stage set up outside Buckingham Palace.

Less than 30 minutes

Paul McCartney was a favourite of the Duchess of Cambridge.

Elton John joked that Philip was faking his illness because he hated pop music.

Robbie Williams had William and Harry dancing and singing.

Tom Jones was a particular favourite of Prince Harry.

http://cdn.assets.cougar.bauer-media.net.au/s3/digital-cougar-assets/AWW/2013/09/17/33870/johnny.jpg

Annie Lennox.

Grace Jones.

Dame Shirley Bassey.

Sir Cliff Richard.

Gary Barlow and Cheryl Cole.

Stevie Wonder and Will.i.am.

Main

Jessie J.

The crowd cheered raucously when the queen arrived.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

A right Royal sing-a-long!

The royal family are certainly enjoying the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations, which continued in the UK overnight, in front of a 12,000 strong crowd!

Following star-studded performances by Robbie Williams, Kylie Minogue, Tom Jones, Elton John, Grace Jones and Annie Lennox, Prince Charles closed the concert with a very touching speech to his mother.

Referring to the Queen as “Mummy” he thanked her “for inspiring us with your selfless duty and service and for making us proud to be British.”

He also acknowledged his father, The Duke of Edinburgh, who was unwell and unable to attend the concert.

Flick through the pictures of the royal family enjoying the Diamond Jubilee concert here!

Prince Charles kisses the Queen on the hand following his heartfelt speech.

The Duchess of Cambridge and Prince William sing along.

Queen Elizabeth II, who arrived mid-way through the concert, waves to the crowd.

Prince William and Prince Harry get into the spirit of things.

Kylie Minogue performs at the Jubilee concert.

Tom Jones takes to the stage.

Jessie J and Will.i.am rock it out together on stage.

Elton John performs.

UK singers Gary Barlow and Cheryl Cole perform.

The young royals enjoying the concert.

Kylie Minogue introduces the Queen to fellow celebrities backstage.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Is Facebook ruining your relationship?

Is Facebook ruining your relationship?

Facebook is changing the world in ways Mark Zuckerberg never expected.

One in three US divorce filings involving unreasonable behaviour last year included the word Facebook, a Divorce Online survey recently revealed.

The findings are backed by research from the American Academy of Matrimonial lawyers, which also found more than eight out of 10 lawyers said there had been an increase in the role of social media in divorce proceedings.

K Jason Kfrafsky, the author of the book Facebook and Your Marriage, points to eight problems Facebook can create in relationships, including getting back in touch with an old flame, or flirting on status updates, pictures or pokes.

Facebook can also cause problems if people air their dirty laundry or over-share on the site.

“Using Facebook to announce marriage problems, debate marital issues or rant on a spouse is only going to make a conflicted relationship more ‘complicated,'” he writes on the website Techlationships.

Developing an over-dependence on the site, or spending more time with the animals on Farmville than real-life ones, can also cause problems, Mr Kfrafsky says.

“Unrealistically comparing the new and exciting information people are posting online with the drab and boring life from one’s own real-time existence can create all kinds of problems.”

Mr Kfrafsky recommends couples discuss online boundaries for their relationship to safeguard against a Facebook-fuelled divorce.

Your say: Does this ring true to you? Have you or anyone you know had a relationship problem sparked by Facebook? [email protected]

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Quentin Bryce wants wife beater stripped of bravery award

Wife beater not brave after all: Humane Society rescinds award

Governor General Quentin Bryce.

Quentin Bryce has called on the Royal Humane Society to strip a bravery award from a jailed Black Saturday fire fighter who kicked his partner in the head so hard he snapped her optic nerve and left her blinded in one eye.

The Governor-General, a patron of the Royal Humane Society, wrote to the society in March after Paul Francis McCuskey received the award while he was serving a minimum three year jail term for bashing his former partner Jeannie Blackburn in a series of vicious assaults in 2009.

Related: Wife beater to keep bravery award

McCuskey, who helped save an elderly woman and her pets during Victoria’s Black Saturday bushfires, dragged Jeannie from their bed and kicked her in the head and face, leaving her lying in a pool of blood.

In an earlier assault, he kicked in the stomach while she was pregnant. She later miscarried.

When informed of McCuskey’s crimes, the society reviewed the award but decided to let it stand, prompting Ms Bryce to write: “Violence against women should not be tolerated or condoned whenever it occurs, not least in a situation that is an affront to the very principles for which the Royal Humane Society stands … if the society is to banish violence against women, I suggest a zero tolerance is the only way forward.”

The society’s decision to uphold McCuskey’s award devastated Jeannie Blackburn.

“How can a man who beat me and kicked me and robbed me of my sight be given a bravery award while he’s in prison?” says Ms Blackburn, 48.

“What message does that send about domestic violence? It’s like another slap in the face.”

Related: Has Australia gone soft on domestic violence

The society is now conducting a second review but public pressure continues to build; a petition started by a Queensland woman to have McCuskey’s award taken away has gathered nearly 8000 signatures with more people signing every day.

Your say: Do you think the Humane Society should strip McCuskey of his bravery award?

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4868

Adorable synchronised kittens

Adorable synchronised kittens

When it comes to cute pet videos, you can’t go past a basket of kittens.

And although there are plenty of cute animal videos on Woman’s Day‘s pet tv!, it’s hard to go past five kittens copying each other!

Check out the video of these five adorable kittens who move in perfect unison in the video player above.

Related stories


Advertisement