Advertisement
Home Page 4851

A Shire boy’s review of The Shire

A Shire boy's review of The Shire

The Shire's Vernesa and Sophie.

First things first. I need to declare an interest. I am from The Shire — born and bred in god’s country, raised on the fair plains to the south of Sydney, reared on a steady diet of white bread, meat and three veg.

My reaction to last night’s televisual train wreck? It was like when you meet someone really stupid.

You spend the first ten minutes in a state of total disbelief — jaw on the ground.

You spend the next ten minutes staring in wide-eyed amazement, trying to work out if they are real or not (which, in the case of Channel 10’s new “dramality”, I think we can all safely assume they are not).

Related: In defence of The Shire (the place, not the show)

Then you spend the next ten minutes trying to look away, your head hurting from the hideousness of it all.

As a Shire boy, was I offended by last night’s show? Not in the slightest. We’ve had much worse thrown at us.

This is the place, after all, that served as the setting for Puberty Blues — a book and movie that made the immortal words: “Hey Freda, you slack-arse mole” synonymous with an entire people.

This is a region that invented the school-yard fruito (or if we didn’t invent it, we sure as hell perfected it); a place where not a day at school went by when you didn’t run the risk of having your head flushed — and all of it good, stern, character-building stuff.

True, The Shire is one of the more mono-cultural pockets of Sydney. A tiny corner of our fair country in which (at least when I was growing up there) lasagne was considered exotic and a night of gastronomy meant honey prawns and beef and black bean down at the local Chinese.

Perhaps the only place in the world that turned a race riot into an expression of patriotism: “We grew here, you flew here” being one of the more choice slogans to come out of the 2005 Cronulla beach riots.

But to have the likes of Beckaa and her creepy dad flying the flag for The Shire? To have the more-plastic-than-actual-human Vernesa and Sophie daring to set foot on the hallowed sand of North Cronulla beach and try to pass themselves off as typical Shire girls? It’s an insult that we’re not going to take lying down.

Now I’m not entirely sure I agree with Sutherland Shire Mayor, Carol Provan, who has called for State Government intervention to stop Channel Ten from filming the series.

I’m offended by fake tans, collagen lips and shopping trips to Dubai to pick up a nose job as much as the next person, but short of blowing up Tom Ugly’s Bridge and launching proceedings to officially secede from the nation (in which case, I’d like to formally nominate Shire resident Glen McGrath as our new President), there’s nothing to be done.

And while I applaud her perfectly-coiffed efforts this morning on the Today Show to defend her people, I’m not sure the Mayor’s assertion that Vernesa and Sophie “looked more like they came from Burwood than The Shire” would really have won her many fans. Certainly not in Burwood.

The only solace we can take as Shire people is that this so-called “dramality” is heavily-scripted rubbish.

The producers will tell you that the show is only “soft scripted” — meaning they simply record what happens in the lives of these dreadful people and only occasionally nudge things in a direction that suits the cameras.

But if that were really the case, how do they explain why the characters and plotlines (and I use that last word very loosely) are carbon copies of the UK series, The Only Way Is Essex?

Memo to Channel Ten: If you’re going to create a new show, at least try to make it marginally different from one that already exists. I mean, there’s “taking inspiration” and then there’s “blatant ripping off’ — and as viewers, we can pick the difference.

Reactions to the show in the media this morning and in the social media sphere have been almost universally damning.

However, if I was a Channel Ten executive, I’d be sitting in my office thinking: “mission accomplished”.

The ratings were okay, if not spectacular, but more importantly, it’s the most talked-about TV show since, well, since Being Lara Bingle.

Related: Why we should leave the body image debate to teens

Whether all this chatter will translate into a ratings lift for next week’s instalment or a precipitous slide (which, if God really was born in The Shire as per local legend, is surely bound to happen) only time will tell.

Meanwhile, and as I wrote in a Sunday newspaper column at the weekend: whether this program goes on to unprecedented international success or disappears without a trace, you can rest assured that the people of The Shire will have the last laugh. Because we learned to laugh at ourselves long before this TV show came along.

Video: Mayor tears into The Shire

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Is Madonna too old to flash her breasts onstage?

Is Madonna too old to flash her breasts onstage?

Madonna flashing her breast onstage in Paris.

At 53, Madonna obviously doesn’t think she is too old to flash her bare breasts and bottom, but The Weekly’s style director Judith Cook disagrees.

Parisians are famously open-minded, but the sight of Madonna’s bare breast left 80,000 of them outraged on Saturday night.

The 53-year-old singer flashed her boob and her derriere — partially covered by a lace thong — while performing her 1995 hit Human Nature during her concert in the French capital.

Related: Why you can’t find plus-size clothes

It’s not the first time Madonna’s breasts and bottom have been exposed onstage this year, prompting people to question whether the Queen of Pop is getting too old for such hijinks.

But with many claiming 60 is the new 30, is there still an age where women should cover up? The Weekly’s style director Judith Cook believes emphatically that there is.

“There comes a time when women have to cover up, for dignity’s sake,” Judith says. “Madonna is a mother. What would her children think about her behaviour?

“Really, short skirts should be banished once you’re 30 and arms should be covered from the age of 55.

“People think revealing clothes make them look younger but they actually accentuate all the signs of age — they make all the lumps, bumps, wrinkles and sun damage more obvious.”

But getting older doesn’t mean you can’t look sexy. Judith says there are plenty of ways for mature women to show off their figures without embarrassing themselves by exposing too much.

“A beautiful statement necklace or scarf is a great way to cover up your chest without looking boring or conservative” she says.

Related: The Duchess of Cambridge in Photoshop scandal

“You can also try layering a few sheer things, so you get the beautiful effect of sheer garments without revealing too much flesh.

“Really, you should just be aiming to cover up and look dignified and classy. There is nothing to gain from wearing revealing clothing past a certain age.”

Your say: Do you think women should cover up after a certain age?

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Grandparents say goodbye to retirement living, hello to full-time childcare

Grandparents say goodbye to retirement living, hello to full-time childcare

As the cost of living skyrockets, more Australian families are relying on grandparents instead of formal childcare. But how do the grandparents feel about their new roles as caregivers?

Yvonne Coombes, 78, lives in a granny flat at the back of her son’s family home.

She has been retired for many years, but now works full-time again, looking after her grandchildren, aged three and five, while their mother works.

Related: What to do when your kids don’t get along

“It is much harder now taking care of grandchildren then when I looked after my other grandchildren at 50,” Yvonne says. “It is a big responsibility.”

But while Yvonne admits running around after two young girls is exhausting, she prefers it to the alternative — sending the girls to a childcare facility.

“I’d much rather take care of them then them going to day care though,” she says. “They love their home and their things.”

Yvonne’s daughter-in-law Alanna is convinced she couldn’t cope without grandparental care.

She says the cost of childcare is becoming prohibitive, and many families have no choice but to make alternative arrangements.

“They girls adore their nan. I don’t know how we’d manage if we didn’t have her,” Alanna says.

Related: Are we raising a generation of brats?

The Coombes family are by no means unique. In 2011, more Australian children (26 percent) were being cared for by their grandparents than childcare providers (24 percent).

Your say: Who cares for your kids when you are at work? Share your story below

Video: Childcare Decisions

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

How to help your child lose weight

How to help your child lose weight

Posed by model.

It is easy to criticise the parents of overweight children, but would you know what to do if your child was obese? It’s not as simple as cutting out the junk food, as childhood obesity expert Dr Matt Sabin explains.

Sabin, who runs an obesity clinic at Melbourne’s Royal Children’s Hospital, says putting an overweight kid on a strict diet is not only inadvisable — it’s potentially dangerous.

Related: Is it ever okay to tell your child they’re fat?

Instead, food intake should be gradually reduced and combined with a rigorous exercise regime.

“Doing one without the other simply won’t work, especially in young children where exercise has many other benefits on physical and psychological health and where calorie restriction alone to induce stabilisation in weight gain would not be safe,” Sabin says.

Adults often struggle to stick to crash diets, and Sabin says children are no different.

“If there are a lot of tantrums and fights then it is unlikely that there will be a good short- to medium-term outcome,” he says.

If a healthier diet is phased in slowly, the opposite occurs and parents often find their child becomes far more even-tempered and well-behaved.

“More often, there is a reduction in mood swings and an improvement in behaviour as the child consumes less processed and high glycaemic foods,” Sabin says.

Even if your child is a healthy weight, there are things you can do to ensure they avoid obesity later in life.

Dietician Jane Barnes from FoodSense, thinks the key to this is raising your kids to see food as fuel and not a reward.

“We have set up an environment with food as a reward,” Barnes says. “We have got this notion of food as a reward from childhood experiences.”

Related: What to do when your kids don’t get along

Despite this, Barnes says children should still enjoy the occasional treat. Junk food shouldn’t be banned, just eaten in moderation.

“Food should still be fun,” Barnes says. “I am a believer in having a little bit of everything. Nowadays when you go to McDonald’s you have a large coke a large fries and a large burger. This is just unhealthy.

“We can still feed our kids fast food here and there but rather than having that large meal, you could share two burgers and some fries between three or four people.”

Your say: Have your kids struggled with their weight? Share your story below

Video: Puberty at five years old – is obesity to blame?

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Suri left in tears after Katie refuses to buy her a puppy

Suri left in tears after Katie refuses to buy her a puppy

Suri Cruise was left in tears over the weekend after mum Katie Holmes turned down her request for a puppy.

The mother and daughter were seen looking at dogs at high-end pet store Citipups in New York.

But after seeing just two particularly cute canines, including a French bulldog and a morkie (Yorkshire terrier/Maltese cross) the pair left empty-handed.

Suri certainly wasn’t happy with her mum’s decision to leave the puppies behind, shedding a tear as they left the pet shop and hysterically crying once in their car.

The six-year-old and her mum have been spending a lot of time together in New York following Holmes’ speedy divorce from Tom Cruise, which took just 11 days for the pair to settle out of court.

Meanwhile, Holmes is doing everything she can to keep Suri away from Scientology, enrolling her in a Catholic all-girls school.

Up until now, Suri has been home schooled but will soon attend Manhattan’s prestigious Convent of the Sacred Heart school, the UK’s Daily Mail reported.

The $38,000-a-year school requires students to attend church every Thursday and has been attended by a number of celebrities, including Lady Gaga, Nicky Hilton and Caroline Kennedy.

While the details of the pair’s divorce proceedings are private, reports claim that Holmes has been granted sole custody of Suri, with Cruise having considerable visitation rights.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Demi Moore’s daughters consider restraining order

Demi Moore’s daughters consider restraining order

The three daughters of troubled star Demi Moore are considering taking a restraining order out against her.

Previous reports have suggested that the relationship between the 49-year-old and the daughters she had with Bruce Willis had reached “breaking point” with numerous fights.

“Rumer, Scout and Tallulah are seriously considering taking out a restraining order against Demi to stop her from contacting them,” an unnamed source told RadarOnline.

“They made it clear to her weeks ago that they do not want to talk to her right now but she is still trying to contact them.”

Demi, who is “beside herself” over the loss of contact has tried time and time again to make contact with her daughters, but they refuse to speak to her.

“Demi has been calling them incessantly and emailing them, leaving them tearful messages and begging them to call her and the girls are sick of it,” the unnamed source said.

“It is a really drastic measure and not something they are considering lightly but they just feel like they want some peace and quiet.”

Her daughters supported her through her break-up with Ashton Kutcher and rehab, but now they don’t want to “deal with the drama” surrounding their mother and feel that they need time out.

“Demi is just being very needy right now and the girls are tired of it. They want a mother not another little sister,” the source said.

“They are all concerned that she is going to relapse and head back to rehab and they can’t deal with the stress and worry of it.”

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Miley Cyrus keen to start a family “quickly”

Miley Cyrus keen to start a family "quickly"

They’ve only been engaged for just over a month, but there are already reports suggesting that Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth are talking about babies.

The 19-year-old singer is reportedly hoping to start a family “quickly” with her 22-year-old Hunger Games star fiancé.

“Miley and Liam really want to have a baby quickly,” an unnamed Cyrus family source told Us Weekly.

It seems Liam is a little clucky after his older brother Chris welcomed daughter India in May with his wife, Spanish actress Elsa Pataky.

And when the pair finally do tie the knot and begin adding to their family, which currently includes the pair’s five dogs, they will have the support of their families. “They are both mature and ready for this. Miley is 19 going on 40,” the unnamed source said.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Lisa Wilkinson’s cancer scare: How my husband saved me

Lisa Wilkinson's cancer scare: How my husband saved me

Trouble was staring Lisa Wilkinson right between her eyes – but it was her husband Peter FitzSimons who spotted it.

Today show host Lisa Wilkinson is on a mission to raise skin cancer awareness after discovering a mark on her face she’d always assumed was “just a freckle” turned out to be a potentially cancerous melanoma. “I probably noticed it 20 years ago and just saw it as part of what my face looked like,” Lisa tells Woman’s Day. “It’s laughable that I could have a camera trained on me for 3.5 hours a day, five days a week, and I could not spot trouble right between my eyes.”

It was Lisa’s hubby, broadcaster and writer Peter FitzSimons, who first noticed all was not right and urged his wife to visit a doctor to get things checked out. And for a man who Lisa admits “wouldn’t notice if I put on 20kg overnight”, his keen skills of observation might have saved her life. “I came home from work one day and, typically, coming off the set of the show, I had a full face of make-up on. Pete looked at me and said, ‘What’s that between your eyebrows?’, and I, thinking it was a bit of dirt or misplaced mascara, said, ‘My freckle? That’s been there for years!’” explains Lisa.

“God love him, he never looks at me with a critical eye. He would love me in any shape that I come in, thank heaven. But, importantly, he just noticed this freckle for the first time, and I tried to convince him that it had been there for a long time, and he said, ‘Well, if it’s been there for a long time and I haven’t noticed it, it must be getting darker.’”

After weeks of Peter’s nagging, Lisa gave in and went to see her GP, who then referred her to a dermatologist. “He [the dermatologist] had a look under this specialist microscope and said, ‘The cells do look irregular’,” Lisa recalls. “He said, ‘I need to cut it out and do a biopsy.’” Doctors removed the freckle while she was on a production break from Today over Christmas. The presenter ended up with four stitches and had to endure a tense wait before she got the results back. The news wasn’t good.

Read more about Lisa’s cancer scare in this week’s Woman’s Day on sale Monday July 16, 2012.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Why Tom Cruise let Katie Holmes win

Why Tom Cruise let Katie Holmes win

Despite the couple reaching a settlement at breakneck speed, the battle is only just beginning.

Katie Holmes may have already won the battle to keep her daughter – but she hasn’t won the war against her ex-husband Tom Cruise. As Hollywood prepared for the fiercest courtroom divorce in history to get underway, the couple had secretly been locked in tense, round-the-clock negotiations over Katie’s bid for sole custody of their daughter, Suri. Just 11 days after Katie announced she’d filed for divorce, it was revealed that Tom and Katie had reached a private settlement.

When Katie emerged from her lawyer’s New York office after six hours, she gave a tight smile to waiting onlookers. It was an indication that reports she had won primary custody of the six-year-old were correct. It’s believed Tom will have “generous visitation rights” and pay “massive” child support.

Also, he’ll avoid his career and Scientology being publicly dragged through the mud. In fact, at face value, it appears Catholic Katie has agreed to disagree with Tom over his controversial religion. “We are committed to working together as parents to accomplish what is in our daughter Suri’s best interests,” the couple said in a joint statement. “We… express respect for each other’s commitment to our respective beliefs.”

But according to sources, Katie, 33, is desperate to prevent Suri being exposed to the controversial religion and has stipulated in their agreement that whenever Suri visits Tom, 50, she will be accompanied by Katie- approved minders to ensure her father and his team keep their Scientology beliefs to themselves.

Read more about Tom and Katie’s divorce in this week’s Woman’s Day on sale Monday July 16, 2012.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4851

Bea and Eugenie beg Fergie: ‘Get help now!’

Bea and Eugenie beg Fergie: 'Get help now!'

The Duchess of  York’s girls aren’t the only ones alarmed by her behaviour – Oprah is too.

Sarah Ferguson’s daughters are said to be living in fear for their mum, as the Duchess of York lurches from crisis to crisis. Royal insiders say Princess Beatrice, 23, and Princess Eugenie, 22, have had a succession of “heart-to-heart” talks with her in recent months, pleading with her to get help – and they have repeatedly told their dad Prince Andrew how worried they are about her.

A source close to the young princesses tells Woman’s Day that last weekend Eugenie tearfully confessed to her father that she has started to avoid speaking to her mum because she is struggling to cope with her meltdown. Eugenie apparently sobbed as she told Andrew, “When I see it is her calling I don’t answer and then she leaves voicemails or she writes me these long emails. But I can’t keep trying to solve all her problems – I’m her daughter. She should be the one helping me.
She needs to see a proper therapist.”

And Bea and Eugenie aren’t the only ones advising the troubled duchess to seek professional help confronting her demons. When Oprah Winfrey had four missed calls from Sarah in 24 hours, she knew something was very wrong and she had little choice but to get in contact with her immediately.

When she finally reached her, she was shocked to discover that a frazzled and frantic Fergie was begging for a chance to build a TV career on the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN). Oprah listened in disbelief as the 52-year-old launched into a rambling explanation of her plan to “save us both”.

Read more about why Fergie needs help in this this week’s Woman’s Day on sale Monday July 16, 2012.

Related stories


Advertisement