Home Page 4731

Adam Scott: Australia’s first US Masters champion

After decades of waiting, wishing and wasted opportunities, Australian golf fans have finally got what they've always dreamed of – a US Masters champion.
Adam Scott

After decades of waiting, wishing and wasted opportunities, Australian golf fans have finally got what they’ve always dreamed of – a US Masters champion.

Adam Scott, 32, won the 2013 Masters Tournament on the second hole of a tense sudden death playoff against Argentinean Angel Cabrera.

Scott’s historic victory has delighted golf fans across the country who have been waiting for an Aussie champion since 1950 when Jim Ferrier became the first Aussie in with a chance of slipping on the coveted green jacket.

To celebrate Scott’s win, we have put together a collection of pictures from his career.

Adam Scott in the coveted green jacket.

Scott after the putt that won him the 2013 Masters Tournament.

Scott after his historic Masters win.

Scott in the lead-up to the 2012 Australian Open.

Scott after winning the Australian Masters in November 2012.

Scott’s 2011 PGA tour headshot.

Scott after winning the Bridgestone Invitational in August 2011.

Scott after winning the Singapore Open in 2010.

Scott after winning the 2009 Australian Open.

Scott in China in November 2008.

Scott at the Masters in 2007.

Scott at the 2006 PGA Tour Championship.

Scott at The Tour championship in November 2006.

Scott after winning the Singapore Open in 2006.

Scott at the Bridgestone Invitational in August 2006.

Scott at the US Open in 2005.

Scott after winning the Johnnie Walker classic in 2005.

Scott after winning the 2005 Nissan Open.

Nissan Open in February 2005.

Scott’s 2004 PGA Tour headshot.

Scott at the 2004 Players Championships.

Scott at The Players Championships in 2004.

Scott after winning the Booz Allen tournament in 2004.

Scott after winning the 2003 Deutsche Bank Championships.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

SJP sells Sex and the City shoes

If you have ever wanted to walk in Carrie Bradshaw’s shoes, now’s your chance!

Sarah Jessica Parker is placing three pairs of heels from her Sex and the City days up for auction, with all the proceeds going to New York’s LaGuardia High School of Music, Art and the Performing Arts.

The 48-year-old actress, who played Manolo Blanki-obsessed Carrie Bradshaw in the TV series, has placed heels from Prada, Jonathan Kelsey and Dolce Vita all up for auction.

The auction is sponsored by Gotta Have Rock and Roll and has a collection of shoes from other stars including Madonna and Britney Spears.

See the shoes up for sale and take a look at some of the best footwear from Sex and the City here.

Sarah Jessica Parker as Carrie Bradshaw in *Sex and the City*.

Sarah Jessica Parker as Carrie Bradshaw in Sex and the City.

SJP’s Brown leather Prada platform sandals to be auctioned.

SJP’s Dolce Vita black leather pumps to be auctioned.

Jonathan Kelsey silver cage heels sandals owned, worn and signed by SJP.

SJP’s wears dazzling Christian Louboutin pigalle heels.

SJP wears red peep-toe heels.

SJP wears Brian Atwood lavendar pumps.

Kristin Davis wears pointed toe heels on set.

Carrie’s blue Manolo Blanki wedding shoes.

SJP wears peep toe glittered boots.

SJP wearing a typical Carrie outfit with pointed red heels.

SJP wears Christian Louboutin heels.

SJP wears black and yellow T-bar heels.

Cynthia Nixon wears spiked gladiator heels.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Gwyneth Paltrow: “I’ll never do botox again”

Gwyneth Paltrow has sworn never to get botox again, but she is happy to indulge in painful laser treatment because it takes "five years off my face".
Gwyneth Paltrow in US Harpers Bazaar magazine

Gwyneth Paltrow has sworn never to get botox again, but she is happy to indulge in painful laser treatment because it takes “five years off my face”.

In a revealing interview with US Harpers Bazaar, the actress admitted to trying botox injections but said she would never do it again.

“I’ll try anything. Except I won’t do Botox again, because I looked crazy,” she said.

“I looked like Joan Rivers!”

While the 40-year-old ruled out plastic surgery — she would be “scared to go under the knife” — Paltrow did say she had tried “painful” Thermage laser treatment.

“It feels like someone’s smacking your face with a rubber band that has an electric shock in it,” she said.

“But I would do it again, because I feel like it took five years off my face.”

Gwyneth Paltrow on the cover of US Harpers Bazaar. Photography by Daniel Jackson.

Gwyneth Paltrow Harper’s Bazaar

The Oscar-winning actress who recently penned a healthy eating cookbook made a surprise admission in the interview, saying she occasionally smokes.

“My one light American Spirit that I smoke once a week, on Saturday night,” she said, citing the habit as her “guilty pleasure”.

Paltrow acknowledged the contradiction of promoting a healthy lifestyle in her newly published cookbook and partaking in controversial beauty treatment and smoking.

“I think it’s a mix,” she said.

“You know, I use organic products, but I get lasers. It’s what makes life, finding the balance between cigarettes and tofu.”

Posing for the cover of the fashion magazine, shot by photographer Daniel Jackson, the actress also spoke of the possibility of expanding her family.

Mother to Apple, eight, and Moses, six, Paltrow said she hasn’t ruled out trying for a third child.

“But then you see a baby and you smell a baby!” she said.

“And you’re like, ‘yep, I do.’ I don’t know. It’s a very big decision, so we’ll see. Anyway, I’m not doing it this month!”

The actress-turned-cookbook author is on the publicity trail for her new book and upcoming film Iron Man 3.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Sorry Becks! Babies prefer fat dads

Sorry Becks! Babies prefer fat dads

Babies prefer Jack Black's huskier physique (right) to David Beckham's more muscular one (left).

Women might like their men muscle-bound and svelte, but babies prefer fatter fathers, a new study has found.

Researchers from the University of Sheffield concluded that infants favoured chubby men because their bodies were more feminine and familiar.

Psychologists showed photographs of toned male models next to images of overweight men to three groups of babies, aged three months, six months and nine months.

The infants’ response to the different body shapes was monitored by video cameras, which tracked which physique their eyes lingered on.

Analysis of the video showed that nine-month-old babies “significantly” preferred the “less attractive physique”.

Six-month-olds could tell the difference between the two bodies but showed no obvious preference, while three-month-olds showed no signs of recognising any difference.

The researchers hypothesised that babies prefer fatter bodies because they were more prevalent in society, and thus the infants were more accustomed to seeing them, and less used to rippling muscles.

“Because unattractive body shapes are more common than attractive/athletic body shapes in our everyday environment, a preference for unattractive body shapes at nine months of age suggests that preferences for particular human body shapes reflect level of exposure and familiarity rather than culturally defined stereotypes of body attractiveness,” the researchers wrote in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Body image debate: Is airbrushing ever ok?

Body image debate: Photoshopping models to look 'normal' is not the answer

Ultra-thin models at Mercedes-Benz Australian Fashion Week

Fashion bloggers are airbrushing images of scarily thin models to make them appear more healthy but the Melbourne girl whose anti-airbrushing protest prompted Cleo magazine to reconsider its retouching policy says it’s never ok to publish altered images of women’s bodies.

The Weekly reported yesterday that images of models at Australian fashion week were being photoshopped to smooth over sharp bones protruding from their unhealthy-looking frames by bloggers worried about promoting poor body image.

Editor of fashion blog Style Melbourne Sarah Willcocks told aww.com.au she was so shocked by an image of a model at Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week Australia, she photoshopped the image before sharing it with her readers.

While she is generally anti-photoshop, Ms Willcocks found the image too shocking to publish unretouched.

“It was because I didn’t want my readers thinking bones are glamorous or beautiful,” she told aww.com.au.

But 21-year-old Jessica Barlow who will later this month launch her own retouch-free magazine and last year made national magazines listen up with a petition against photoshopping images of girls in Cleo, says that even when done with the best intentions, digitally altering women’s body shapes is not on.

“If I had those pictures and I was worried about them, there is no way I would run them,” she told aww.com.au.

“I see what they’re trying to do and I do commend that, but [altering the image] is not something I would do because to me that’s just introducing a whole other set of problems.

“If the model is not healthy and is not looking healthy then it doesn’t matter how fantastic the dress, it’s not right to change the image and publishing the image that is quite obviously not healthy is not sending a good message.”

When asked if there was ever a point where airbrushing is ok, Jessica said that when it came to altering body shape, she wouldn’t stand for it.

“I think when it comes to lighting and that sort of thing it’s fine, but it’s when a body or physical appearance is changed I think that is incorrect and that is something I will never ever say is a good thing.”

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Before bones were beautiful: 90s supermodels

The skeletal models stalking the catwalks at Fashion Week in Sydney this week have been so painfully thin they’ve raised eyebrows, even in fashion circles.

But while girls are reportedly collapsing backstage and fashion bloggers are being forced to use Photoshop to cover up runway stars’ protruding bones, prominent Australian designers are insisting they use super-skinny models because there simply aren’t any others.

We think it’s time models went back to what they were in the 1990s – slender, toned, healthy-looking girls, not the bony waifs of today. Here are our favourite 1990s models.

Cindy Crawford, Naomi Campbell and Helena Christensen in the 1990s.

Cindy Crawford modelling for Versace in 1992.

Helena Christensen modelling Todd Oldman’s Fall collection in 1994.

Claudia Schiffer modelling Chanel in 1993.

Karen Mulder in the 1997 Victoria’s Secret fashion show.

Stephanie Seymour in the 1996 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show.

Naomi Campbell modelling Gianni Versace in 1999.

Stephanie Seymour modelling Todd Oldman’s Fall collection in 1994.

Linda Evangelista modelling Calvin Klein in 1995.

Christy Turlington modelling Donatella Versace in 1998.

Naomi Campbell modelling for Victoria’s Secret in 1997.

Even Kate Moss, the poster girl for ‘heroin chic’, isn’t as thin as today’s models.

Kate Moss modelling Miu Miu in 1995.

French model Ines de la Fressange modelling Chanel in 1984.

Iman modelling Oscar de la Renta in 1989.

Skinny models at Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Prince William to leave RAF to be with his wife

Prince William to leave RAF to be with his wife

With his first child due in a little over three months, Prince William is preparing to become more of a family man.

A source close to the prince has told People magazine that William will soon announce he is leaving the RAF Valley to spend more time at home with his wife Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, and their baby.

William, a search-and-rescue helicopter pilot based in Anglesey, Wales, is often away from his wife for weeks at a time.

Despite his love for his job, he would much prefer to spend time with Catherine and their dog Lupo in their farmhouse home.

“He’s ready for the next step,” says the source.

And despite the pair already having an incredible bond, those close to them say Catherine’s pregnancy has brought them even closer.

“They’ve always been close but it’s been much more pronounced since she has become pregnant,” royals author Judy Wade says.

Royal photographer Mark Stewart agrees, saying the pair are “much more touchy-feely than they were”.

The couple, who have attended a number of royal events together lately, have also been focusing on baby names and overseeing the renovations of the late Princess Margaret’s former 21-room residence at Kensington Palace in London, which they plan to move into this fall.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Still an Angel: Miranda Kerr ‘not fired’ from Victoria’s Secret

Still an Angel: Miranda Kerr 'not fired' from Victoria's Secret

Miranda Kerr in the 2012 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show.

Rumours Miranda Kerr has been dropped by lingerie giant Victoria’s Secret are “untrue” her agent has claimed.

Reports the 30-year-old Aussie supermodel had been dumped as an “Angel” because she was “too difficult” began circulating yesterday.

The New York Daily News claimed Miranda — whose current three-year $1 million contract with Victoria’s Secret ends this year — had been fired after demanding a “massive” new deal and having too many international commitments.

Victoria’s Secret President Ed Razek has denied the claims, insisting Miranda was one of the company’s most popular models and would continue to work as an Angel for a long time.

“Miranda Kerr is one of the best models in the history of the business — and easily one of the most popular,” he said in a statement.

“She is also a consummate professional. Any rumours to the contrary are simply untrue.

“While her international commitments have kept her away from us more than we’d like over the past few years, she will always be an Angel to me.

“In fact, I’ve already invited her to walk the runway in this year’s fashion show and, happily, she’s agreed.”

A representative for Miranda passed on Razek’s statement.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Super model Miranda gets her angel wings clipped

Super model Miranda gets her angel wings clipped

Aussie supermodel Miranda Kerr is no longer an angel.

The 30-year-old’s $US1 million ($949,000) contract as a Victoria’s Secret angel has not been renewed, an industry insider tells Us Weekly.

The source claims that her “difficult reputation” is to blame, and says Miranda isn’t a big seller for the lingerie company in comparison to fellow angels Candice Swanepoel and Alessandra Ambrosio.

“They can still use her for catalogue, where she will get a day rate, but she doesn’t have to be an Angel to do that,” the source said.

Victoria’s Secret executives did not deny Miranda’s contract has not been renewed, but praised her as one of the most popular models.

“We have no plans to stop working with her,” the company’s chief marketing officer, Ed Razek, said in a statement.

“Any rumours to the contrary are simply untrue.

“While her international commitments have kept her away from us more than we’d like over the past few years, she will always be an Angel to me. We have no plans to stop working with her.”

Miranda recently announced that she was no longer an ambassador for David Jones, leaving the job after five years. She has been replaced with 27-year-old model Jessica Gomes.

Related stories


Home Page 4731

Kirstie Clements: Thin is in because designers demand it

Why we need to get serious about body image

The ultra-thin models that caused a stir at the Alex Perry show on Monday.

Skinny women are the norm at Fashion Week, but the waifs walking the runway at this year’s shows are thin even by model standards. Top designer Alex Perry has defended his choice of models, claiming he ran out of time to find healthier-sized girls, but former Vogue editor Kirstie Clements says as far as most designers are concerned, there’s no such thing as too thin.

It’s Fashion Week in Sydney and the coverage has begun about severely underweight models and the dangerous message they send to young and impressionable women.

I feel even closer to it this year, because as a former editor of Vogue, I spoke some truths about models and dieting in my book The Vogue Factor, which captured the attention of the press worldwide.

As an editor I would attend the international fashion shows each season, and after four weeks on the road seeing thin model after thin model stride down the runway, I must admit I became de-sensitised to their tiny size.

I wasn’t there to evaluate their bodies, I was there to look at clothes. It wasn’t until I touched down at Sydney Airport that the real world would reappear, and size four seemed so incongruous.

But the girls that are booked for the shows are considered to be the top models in the world and they are the size the designers and the casting agents demand. They set the rules.

If you look at the measurements of most of these top girls and do the math, you can see that only the thinnest are in demand. Aussie model Julia Nobis is one of the most highly booked catwalk girls. Her measurements are 32, 24, 34 and she’s 5ft 11in. She got the Saint Laurent campaign. Jemma Baines is 31, 23, 33. Nicole Pollard is another: 32, 25, 35 and 6ft tall. She’s in all the European magazines. Ruby Jean Wilson’s waist is a tiny 22 inches and she is 5ft 11in. She scores the Louis Vuitton campaign. Her look was based on Warhol icon Edie Sedgwick, who famously ate practically nothing.

Very thin, especially in the international market, is in. These measurements decide the sample sizes, and these are the pieces that will later be released to press.

Models are hired for their ability to fit into them. It’s a circle, and if you stand outside of that system, then, well, you’re just not working with the top tier of talent are you?

All of the models just mentioned are in Sydney and they are Paris thin. In that world, this is the ideal. But as stylist Naomi Smith said to me: “The girls always have to hover at that ideal sample size. Someone will tell them very quickly if they put on weight. But often no one will mention if they’ve lost too much.”

The girls also battle with spot reduction, like all women do. You diet to get rid of your bum, and the weight comes off your neck and shoulders. They diet to change parts of the body that are pretty great anyway.

But let’s remember that for some designers and stylists there is no such thing as too thin. They like the way the clothes hang. Many of them are not designing clothes for women with bosoms, or hips anyway.

Watching a show full of miniscule dresses modelled by sylphs this week, I said to a stylist, “I can’t imagine what that dress would like on a size 14 or 16, or if you have bosoms,” and he looked at me aghast and said, “God, they won’t be produced in those sizes!”

I once had lunch with the PR manager of a famous American fashion house and I asked him if there was a woman who worked in its offices who was a size 10 (US). That’s about a size 12 Australian. He looked at me, very puzzled. They only make sample sizes in a 4.

“What does a size 10 woman look like?” he said, genuinely perplexed. “Me,” I answered.

Related stories