Home Page 4614

Harry teases William ‘stop flirting and get on with it’

Harry teases William ‘stop flirting and get on with it’

It looks like sibling rivalry is alive and well between brothers Prince William and Prince Harry.

The pair put their best brotherly banter on display at a recent fundraiser at London’s BGC Partners, where they worked the phones to broker multi-billion pound deals for charities WellChild and SkillForce.

Prince Harry showed off his cheeky nature and almost landed his brother in hot water with his wife Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, telling him to “stop flirting” with a caller and “get on with it”.

Meanwhile, new dad Prince William spent his time chatting to callers about his newborn son, George.

“He’s very well thanks. He’s sleeping quite well,” William told one caller.

But fun-loving Prince Harry went on to tease his older brother, using his gift of the gab to seal his high stakes deals.

“He’s on the phone, it’s all baby chat,” Harry joked. “I’m much better at helicopter chat.”

Harry went on to encourage callers to raise their donations.

“Are you feeling like making some money for charity today? Good. Whatever you’re thinking, you can double it,” he quipped.

The event is held every year in memory of the company’s 658 employees who died in the 9/11 terror attack on the World Trade Center in New York.

In just 50 minutes the duo was able to help broker a $42 billion company record.

The royal pair were joined by Rod Stewart and Penny Lancaster, David ‘The Hoff’ Hasselhoff and former Spice Girl Melanie Chisholm and numerous British celebrities.

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Kylie Minogue to be coach on UK’s The Voice

Kylie Minogue to be coach on UK’s The Voice

Aussie pop princess Kylie Minogue has been named as one of the new coach on the British version of The Voice.

Signing up for the third series of the show in the UK, Kylie is set to join fellow coaches will.i.am and Sir Tom Jones with another coach yet to be announced.

“I’m very excited to become a coach on The Voice,” Minogue said in a statement.

“I love the concept of the show and have been an avid viewer of both series. “The search for new talent is such an important aspect of the music industry and The Voice gives us all a part to play in that. Will I be competitive? Probably more than even I imagine! Watch this space!”

British TV company BBC which airs the show, is hoping Kylie will bring back the fans.

While the show had a strong first season, with an average of 9.21 million viewers, the second season struggled averaging just 7.65 million viewers. While these numbers seem big, British TV viewing numbers are much larger than Australia.

While The Voice has popularity, rival shows The X Factor and Britain’s Got Talent have more of a following and winning artists go on to more successful careers.

Kylie, who will take over from last season’s coach singer Jessie J, looks like she has a big job ahead of her.

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Actress Emily Blunt is expecting!

Actress Emily Blunt is expecting!

Congratulations are in order for British actress Emily Blunt who is pregnant with her first child!

The Devil Wears Prada star and her husband John Krasinski are expecting their first child in just a few months her representative has confirmed to US Weekly.

The pair, who married in Italy back in 2010, have always expressed their desire for a big family.

“We want to have children; I just don’t know when yet,” the 30-year-old told Manhattan magazine last year.

“I’m just not sure about the timing of all of that. We’re both from big families, so I think it’s something we want.”

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Top 8 spring style hair solutions

They say a change is as good as a holiday, so why not kick off the spring season with a new hairstyle!

Woman’s Day spoke to hair stylist and Pantene ambassador Barney Martin about his top eight hair trends for spring 2013.

Barney says this season is all about taking your own personal style and putting a new twist on it.

From introducing a new colour, to trying a new up do, it’s easy to try something new and bring dull hair back to life!

So, here are Barney’s spring style solutions to beautifully fashionable locks!

Pantene ambassador Barney Martin explains the top eight hair trends that are hot right now!

Have a cut and create long layers that give hair weight and look more shiney.

Flip your hair to one side and try some 30’s glamour with a deep side part.

Try an un-done up do that can be worn day-to-day or for a formal event.

Try a big change!Short crops are still big. Think 70’s style Mia Farrow.

When in doubt, try a slick and shiny up do. They are simple, yet classic.

Try a fresh colour of caramel and light brown to welcome the new season.

Floral headscarves worn with loose up do’s are in and summery!

For something different, try soft pastel tones in the hair.

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Angelina makes surprise visit to Tamworth

Angelina makes surprise visit to Tamworth

Hollywood superstar Angelina Jolie shocked locals in Tamworth when she stopped off for a visit on Wednesday.

The actress was in town scouting locations for her new movie Unbroken, which will be filmed in Australia over the next three months.

Flying in on a 35-minute commercial Qantas flight, the actress headed straight to the small town of Werris Creek, a 30-minute drive away from Tamworth, and began looking at locations.

She spent time walking down the town’s main street and an alleyway before briefly looking at a nearby home and posing for photos with fans.

Angelina made the trip with a small entourage in tow, but was without her six children, who remained in Sydney.

The Jolie-Pitt clan arrived in Sydney last Friday and have since spent their time checking out some of the city’s sights, including Taronga Zoo, Sydney Aquarium and the entertainment complex at Moore Park.

Angelina’s fiance Brad Pitt is expected to join his family in Sydney in a matter of days.

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Painting by artist with Down syndrome picked for royal nursery

Painting by artist with Down syndrome picked for royal nursery

Tazia Fawley and her painting which has been given the royal seal of approval.

A painting by a British artist with Down’s syndrome has been chosen by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to hang in their son’s nursery.

The artist, 43-year-old Tazia Fawley, offered the work to Kate and William before the royal baby’s arrival and was thrilled to receive a thank you note from the palace informing her that the couple were pleased with the painting and requested to keep it.

Tazia, an established artist who has been working at her trade for more than a decade, had hoped the couple would like the painting that she worked on for six months.

The brightly-coloured painting, captures a snapshot of the Bristol Balloon Festival with colourful balloons floating through the air, and children’s book character Rupert the Bear.”

The painting is of the Bristol Balloon Festival and it’s one of my favourite pieces of work,” Tazia told SWNS news.

“I gave it to Kate and Wills as a present, because they seem like good people and they wanted to bring some colour into their son’s nursery.

“I’m so excited to know that my painting will be seen by the most famous baby in the world.”

The painting was passed on to St James Palace by charity Heart and Sold, which supports artists with Down’s syndrome.

Suzie Moffatt from the charity contacted the palace before Prince George was born see if they would like Tazia’s art for the baby’s nursery, and was thrilled to receive a note saying the couple like the work.

“The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge request to send best wishes to Suzie Moffatt and Tazia Fawley for their generous gift,” a letter from the Palace read.

“I was thrilled when the Palace replied saying that they’d love the artwork so we sent it over to them,” Ms Moffatt said.

“They were extremely positive towards the artwork and were very supportive of the charity which was brilliant.

“It’s such a lovely piece, and Tazia is such a great artist.”

Tazia, who lives with her mother in Somerset, has been painting for 14 years and works from a studio in their back garden.

She mostly paints landscapes but has also painted a series of pictures of balloons, her favourite of which she gifted to the young royals.

“I don’t really have any favourite artists, I just like painting what I like painting, and that’s about it,” she said.

“I’m not trying to copy anyone else, I paint because I love it and it makes me very happy.”

Tazia’s mother, Gylda, said she is very proud of her daughter and hopes her work can “change a few attitudes about what a dedicated person with Down’s can do.”

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Why women should have babies before 35

Why women should have babies before 35

The miracle of IVF means women can have babies well into their 40s but fertility experts have warned women to start their families by the age of 35 or risk being left “haunted” and childless.

Leading reproductive biologist Professor Mary Herbert told the British Science Festival that women need to be informed about the risks of delaying motherhood.

In the age of IVF and ever-advancing reproductive technologies, Professor Herbert says women mistakenly believe they’ve got decades to start a family.

She says modern women need to be told to stop using their career as an excuse to delay motherhood as working life doesn’t get easier with age, and to be more prepared to put up with some financial hardship as previous generations have.

“From talking to young women, it’s about getting my career established, but in a sense I find that misguided because there is no career that gets less busy as you go on,” Professor Herbert said.

Without this information, women who are left childless could end up “haunted” by their decision to wait.

“The most important message is for women to have their babies before the clock strikes 12,” Professor Herbert said.

“I would be getting worried about my daughter if she hadn’t had a child by 35.”

Professor Herbert went on to point out that while some women are lucky enough to get pregnant in their 40s or 50s, the vast majority will not, their dreams of motherhood ending in heartbreak.

Those who do fall pregnant face increased health risks for mother and baby, with older mothers being more likely to miscarry, have complicated pregnancies and deliver babies that are underweight or premature.

Stillbirths are twice as common in over-35s and there is a much greater risk of the baby being born with genetic disorders like Down syndrome.

IVF specialist Jane Stewart, secretary of the British Fertility Society, agreed with Professor Herbert, saying family planning clinics and GPs should be forced to discuss the risks of delaying motherhood with all patients.

“Family planning is often seen as a way of avoiding teenage pregnancies, avoiding people being pregnant when they don’t want to be because it doesn’t fit in with their life or social life or whatever else,” Ms Stewart said.

“But family planning has to include when you are going to have your children as well. If you look back and regret it, it will haunt you. The risk is that you will always be troubled by the ‘what if’.”

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Food additives caused my son’s stutter

Food additives caused my son's stutter

Kaelan Mann, whose stutter stopped four weeks after he stopped eating food additives.

When Kaelan Mann was three, he developed a mysterious stutter that doctors couldn’t explain. After months of elimination diets his desperate mum removed food additives from his diet as a last resort. Just four weeks later, the stutter was gone. Here, his mum Anna describes their quest to save Kaelan’s speech.

Kaelan Mann is your typical four-year-old: a busy, carefree kid who is happiest playing outside with his three brothers. He’s energetic and always on the go.

But as he learnt to talk, his mum Anna noticed he was struggling with starting his sentences, “M-m-m-mummy, I don’t want to go to bed now!”

Kaelan’s stutter was random: often it didn’t exist at all in the morning, and became worse later in the day.

After a few months, the local GP referred the then three-year-old to a speech therapist, who was at a loss to explain his speech impediment.

“In her opinion it was not a true stutter,” Anna says. “She said it might be caused by diet or other factors.”

And so began 10 long months of elimination diets and lifestyle changes to see what would work to change Kaelan’s speech habits.

“We tried putting him to bed earlier, and giving him a nap during the day, thinking he might be stuttering because he was tired,” Anna explains. “It had no effect, and his stutter continued.”

The breakthrough came after a birthday party for one of Kaelan’s brothers. “The day after, we could hardly understand him. He was so upset, because he just couldn’t get any words out.”

Anna and her husband Jordan put it down to all the sugar he’d had in the typical birthday party spread. But a week after taking sugar out of their diets, there was still no effect.

“We were desperate and only thought about removing additives as a last resort. My husband and I were really sceptical … after all, the rest of us were totally fine.”

Guided by a diet she found on food intolerance website fedup.com.au, Anna began the slow process of removing additives from her family’s diet.

“My husband and I cleared out the pantry and fridge, and started learning about the names and numbers of additives found in every day foods,” she said.

“We were shocked to see how additives were in nearly everything: from supermarket grapes that are sprayed with chemicals, to pasta sauce that has artificial preservatives added.

“Even fresh prawns are pumped with chemicals so they keep their pink colour.”

Within a month, Kaelan was a different kid. “The change was incredible,” Anna says. “He stopped stuttering completely, and now the only time it comes back is if he’s had an additive somewhere.”

Anna had an existing food business, Bake Me!, that she has now transformed into a preservative-free online store for others facing a similar predicament.

“I’m not a zealot: I wouldn’t have believed this could happen before it happened to me. I just want people to be aware of what preservatives can do to some people.”

The medical profession still can’t explain to Anna what in preservatives caused her son to stutter.

“I explain to people that additives made him hyperactive on the inside. It frightens me that every other kid has food intolerances these days, but we have to start wondering why. As far as I’m concerned, artificial preservatives have a lot to answer for.”

The use of additives and preservatives in Australia is closely monitored by Food Standards Australian and New Zealand, with additional scrutiny provided by the World Health Organisation and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation.

The latest data from the allergy unit at Sydney’s Royal Prince Alfred Hospital suggests around five per cent of the general population are sensitive to food additives. Intolerances range from minor symptoms that only bother the sufferer if they have way too much of something, to serious and chronic problems like asthma and more unusual symptoms like those experienced by Kaelan.

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Why my son is our third and only child

Why my son is our third and only child

Ask Fleur Shaw-Jones how many children she has and she’ll tell you: three. But only one child shares her home. Her first two babies, twins, died minutes after they were born in 2010. Here, she explains the special place they will always have in her life.

Is he your first? It is a benign and well-intentioned question that many parents, including myself, get asked every day of the week. The answer is simple, surely?

“Yes” or “No”. However, the answer I provide can be either “yes” or “no”, depending on who asks the question. Will I ever see them again? If not, I smile politely and say yes. If they are likely to pop up in my life again, then the answer to this simple question is no.

I have an 18-month old son. He is the only child running around our house. He is vibrant, affectionate, funny and adored by all who know him. But he is not our first child or even our second child, he is our third.

He has a brother and a sister who were born 14 months before him. He will never meet them in person, but he has visited their resting place which is marked by a bronze plaque that says all that we feel about them and the gaping loss their premature death left — perfect, longed for, never to be forgotten.

Our first and second child were twins; born 14 minutes apart on 11 December 2010. They lived for just a few short minutes, yet every second of that day is etched in my memory like it happened this morning.

As their plaque suggests, our babies were perfect. But sadly I was not. After an easy 20 weeks of pregnancy, during which I felt vibrant, energetic and crazy with excitement, the wheels fell off — on ultrasound our babies were small for their gestational age.

At 22 weeks gestation, the reason for this declared itself. At a routine obstetrician’s appointment, my blood pressure was sky high. The diagnosis — severe pre-eclampsia.

I was stunned. I had trotted out of my office in high heels to attend the appointment and then planned to head straight home. My husband and I were going out for dinner.

But my commute ended right then and there. Within an hour of leaving work I was occupying a hospital bed. I would return home 24 days later; my life changed forever.

I was informed that I must remain in hospital until our babies were born, the timing of which was completely unknown. What was known, however, was that the chance of carrying the pregnancy anywhere close to term was extremely remote.

The expected date of delivery had moved from 38 weeks to, if we were lucky, 26 weeks.

At 22 weeks I was stuck in a “gestational no man’s land” — our babies were perfectly formed little people, but their organs were not developed enough for them to survive if born that early.

Accordingly, my only job was to eke out as many weeks as possible from my failing body, which was under siege from the effects of pre-eclampsia.

Having been an intensive care nurse, I had cared for women suffering the aftermath of severe pre-eclampsia and its deadly variant, HELLP syndrome (Haemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, Low Platelets).

Accordingly, I knew my situation was dire and the prospect of a successful outcome for all of us was very low. Faced with this knowledge, my only means of survival and hope was to exist in a state of complete denial as to what might transpire.

The magical 26-week mark was Christmas Day and I was determined to make it. The alternative did not bear contemplation.

As news of my condition spread, my hospital room became more festive by the day, with people coming and going, dropping off food and books to get me through the long haul to term. Little did they know, and I was unwilling to admit to them how precarious my situation, and that of our babies, was.

Despite bed rest and a cocktail of drugs my blood pressure climbed day on day until, two weeks after my admission to hospital, I was transferred by ambulance to the Royal Women’s Hospital.

Apparently, I was extremely unwell and if our babies weren’t delivered I would die.

On admission to the RWH I was diagnosed with HELLP syndrome. My body was shutting down. My husband and I were advised that labour would be induced to save my life. I had 24 to 36 hours left at most.

Now there could be no more time on the “inside” for our twins, who were 24 weeks and 1 day gestation and weighed less than 500 grams. We were told that their early gestation and low weight meant their chance of survival was very low, even with maximum medical intervention.

If they were to survive a long period of mechanical ventilation, they would most likely be blind and severely physically and mentally handicapped. Based on the information and advice available to us on that day, we made the heart wrenching decision that we would not resuscitate them when they were born. It is the hardest decision I have ever had to make and it will haunt me forever.

On 11 December 2010, 42 hours after being transferred to the RWH and after a 12-hour labour, our twins were born. At 11.45pm, a girl weighing 386 grams, and at 11.59pm, a boy weighing 452 grams.

The silence in the delivery suite was unbearable. There were no crying babies and no exuberant husband declaring their genders and proudly cutting their cords. Just complete and utter silence. Everyone was speaking in hushed tones and for a short while I didn’t even know where our babies were. I was too sick to ask. Soon though, my husband came over to me with them in his arms.

We unwrapped them from their bunny rugs and inspected them all over, marvelling at their fine little legs and arms, their eyelashes, eyebrows, fingernails and their little pursed lips. They were tiny but absolutely perfect.

“They look like little tiny dolls” was all I could say. I couldn’t even cry. I was so unwell, so overwrought and so exhausted from trying to buy time for them that I felt completely defeated.

Just a few weeks before I thought I was the cleverest person alive — 40 years old, pregnant, twins. Could there be a more perfect scenario?

Now a feeling of utter emptiness and dread overwhelmed me. My wonderful pregnancy had ended, our perfect twins were gone and life as I knew it had changed forever. The next morning the medical staff congratulated me on having survived. I looked at them blankly and said I wished I was dead.

I stayed in hospital for a further 10 days after the birth but would happily have stayed there forever. However, with Christmas looming there was a strong impetus to get me home; lift my spirits.

I left hospital on 22 December and cried all the way home. How could I return to my “old” life after all that had happened? The festivities of Christmas were everywhere and I quickly realised that the Christmas train stops for no one, not even the death of two little babies.

It was the hardest thing to endure. There was nothing worth celebrating, nowhere I wanted to go and no one I wanted to see. I wanted to close the door and wake up when it was all over.

Yet my old self kept prodding me to pep up, go out, see people. It was in my nature to be happy and social, and some people seemed to still expect this of me. So I dragged myself out to dinner, to Christmas Day lunch, the Boxing Day test match and to a New Years’ Eve function.

Yet all the while I was panic stricken and agoraphobic. In hindsight, I was desperate to find a way to feel better. It was a naive approach, but I would have done anything to escape for just a few moments, the feeling of dread that inhabited me constantly. In time I learned there is no way to expedite or conquer grief so I simply surrendered to it and let it have its way with me.

Coupled with my initial need to find a way to feel better, I felt an obligation to relieve the burden of “awkwardness” experienced by family and friends in respect of our “situation”.

This self-imposed pressure stemmed from the broad range of reactions we experienced to the death of our babies. Some people showed incredible insight into our loss, while others completely avoided the topic.

It was like our babies had never existed and I felt that for these people I had to play along. This was by far the most upsetting element of the whole experience and only deepened my sense of isolation and despair. I did not want to be cajoled or cheered up. All I wanted was validation of our heartache.

Soon I came to realise that I needed to do whatever I could to protect myself emotionally. So I closed ranks and went only where I wanted to go and saw only those people I wanted to see. To this day I am regretful that I did not have the strength of character to do this earlier in the process.

Our babies were buried one month after they were born. They lie in a hillside cemetery in the grave of their great-grandparents. It was so final, laying them to rest.

Slowly we began to rebuild our lives and I returned to work three months after I had left the office that fateful day. It was upsetting to be returning to work at the very time when I should have been commencing maternity leave, but it was good to have a purposeful existence once again.

Though content at work, my thoughts were always focused on having another baby. At 41, time was very much against me. Despite medical advice to wait a year before conceiving again, I was pregnant five months after our twins were born.

I have never felt a greater sense of relief and achievement. I had run 10 marathons and completed a law degree at the age of 38, but the determination required for those activities seemed trite in comparison to the mental effort I had to conjure up to conceive again. I was continually plagued with the fear that I would not get another chance.

Incredibly, it was twins again. The chance of recurrent pre-eclampsia was very high and we were advised that “foetal reduction”, where one of the twins would be aborted, offered the best chance delivering a healthy baby.

My position was absolute — I was not willing to undergo a foetal reduction. I would take my chances, confident that I would get further this time around. It seemed to be my destiny. Ultimately there was no decision to be made, as at 12 weeks we were told there would only be 1 baby. Sadly, our other twin had died.

Despite all that had happened, I was determined to enjoy my pregnancy. With daily blood thinning injections and heavy monitoring, we made it all the way to 38 weeks before pre-eclampsia reared its head again.

This time however there was no need to buy time. Our son was delivered the next day. This time around there were lots of noise, a crying baby and a proud father cutting his cord.

As I finish, things are clearer now. There really is only one answer to the question I know I will be asked a thousand times before I die. Is he your first? No matter who asks the question, the answer will always be — no, he’s our third.

Related stories


Home Page 4614

Ashton and Demi’s awkward airport reunion

Ashton and Demi’s awkward airport reunion

Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore were awkwardly reunited on Monday after they arrived back in Los Angeles from a tech conference together!

The formerly married couple, who are still caught up settling a multi-million dollar divorce, appeared friendly with each other as they engaged in an intense conversation.

The estranged pair dodged photographers as they walked through the arrivals area together before going their separate ways.

Ashton, 35, and Demi, 50, split in 2011 after being married for six years.

As there was no pre-nuptial agreement, Demi is now battling for financial support from Ashton – despite her $160 million fortune being about $10 million more than he’s worth!

Nevertheless, Demi wants Ashton to pay for the renovations on her $26m New York apartment while she is also after half of his share in his online business venture A-Grade Investments worth $21 million.

Ashton, who is currently dating actress Mila Kunis, is reportedly prepared to end the on-going battle by meeting some of Demi’s demands. The question is, how much is he willing to pay?

Not that he’ll be in the poor-house – Ashton is TV’s highest-paid actor, with his starring role in sitcom Two And A Half Men scoring him $25m between May 2011 and May 2012.

Related stories