Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Khloe Kardashian buys Justin Bieber’s house

The recently separated reality star is moving on with her life without Lamar Odom by purchasing a new property

The recently separated reality star is moving on with her life without Lamar Odom by purchasing a new property.

Khloe is moving into global popstar Justin Bieber’s former pad, after spending more than $7 million on the house.

She sold the marital home she and Lamar shared in December last year to The Big Bang Theory star Kaley Cuoco and her new husband, Ryan Sweeting.

Bieber put his house on the market after several incidents, including egging the neighbour’s dog, that put him out of favour with the other residents.

Sister Kourtney Kardashian and her partner, Scott Disick, recently bought a property a few doors up from Khloe’s new digs.

See our gallery of pictures inside Khloe’s new house and the one she recently sold.

Khloe Kardashian has bought Justin Bieber’s Los Angeles property for $7.2 million.

Khloe’s new home is located in The Oaks, a gated community in Calabasas, California.

29-year-old Khloe has big plans to completely transform the mansion.

A friend said: “She saw that house as a place she’d like to live for a very long time and she’s smart because she knows that whenever she wants to sell, she’ll make a profit on it.”

The 9,214 square foot estate has six bedrooms and seven bathrooms.

Reports state Khloe has already enlisted interior designer Martyn Lawrence Bullard, from the series Million Dollar Decorators.

“She’s going to put her Khloe touch on it and make it hers,” the friend says.

Justin Bieber purchased the sprawling home in 2012.

Bieber quietly put it on the market after some public, heated run-ins with his neighbours.

Justin is said to be moving to a rented mansion in Atlanta, Georgia for some “time out”.

She sold this house ‘Big Bang Theory’ to actress Kaley Cuoco and her new husband Ryan Sweeting.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Rebecca Judd shows off baby Billie and post-baby body

Most new mums barely have time to shower but Rebecca Judd has found the time to share a series of adorable images of herself and baby girl Billie with her Instagram followers.
Rebecca Twigley Judd and daughter Billie

Most new mums barely have time to shower but Rebecca Judd has found the time to share a series of adorable images of herself – looking immaculate, of course – and baby girl Billie with her Instagram followers.

The new bub, who was born on February 2, is Rebecca’s second child with her AFL footballer husband Chris Judd. The couple’s first child, son Oscar, was born in July 2011.

In the latest intimate post Judd is seen cradling her new bundle of joy while wearing a black figure hugging Jamie Ashkar dress.

Billie was born a week ahead of her expected due date and Bec announced the happy news via social media with the caption “Princess Time”.

Rebecca Judd wearing a Jamie Ashkar dress while holding baby Billie.

Smitten mum, Bec captioned this shot “My Girl”.

Billie Judd looks like one very content little bub.

Bec and Billie share a tender moment.

A glamorous Rebecca with her two children, two-and-a-half year old Oscar and baby Billie.

Apparently the family has nicknamed the new bub “little Juddy”.

Mum and bub having a chuckle!

Little Billie went to work with mum on a photo shoot.

Billie and her custom made baby couture.

Bec posted this family snap of dad Chris holding his baby girl.

“The only way to find time to get ready in the morning is to bring bub into the bathroom with me,” says working mum Bec who seems to have become a master multi-tasker.

“Wouldn’t mind sharing my birthday with bub #getoutplease,” Rebecca wrote shortly before Billie was born.

“Oscar not quite sure how to react to the imminent arrival of a peculiar looking thing in mummy’s tummy? #whoahthatsbig,” Rebecca wrote.

A slender Rebecca Judd stands poolside showing off her baby bump.

The model wears a hot pink dress with nine weeks to go.

Rebecca and her husband, AFL star Chris Judd, at the 2012 Brownlow Medal presentation.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Charlize Theron poses for sexy bikini shoot

The 38-year-old actress has stripped down for a photoshoot with renowned photographer Mario Testino

The 38-year-old actress has stripped down for a photoshoot with renowned photographer Mario Testino.

The South African beauty’s bikini body was in amazing shape as she modelled several swimsuits in Key West, Florida.

The Oscar-winning actress’s son Jackson, 2, was on-set while his mum worked, although Charlize’s new man, Sean Penn was nowhere to be seen.

Sean, 53, and Charlize confirmed they were dating earlier this year and were spotted kissing and cuddling on the beach in Malibu just last week.

Check out Charlize’s smokin’ bikini bod in our gallery.

Charlize shows off her toned stomach.

Charlize showed off her assets in numerous looks throughout the shoot.

Charlize poses at The Florida Keys.

The 38-year-old actress looks stunning in this silver bikini.

Charlize working it for the camera.

Charlize chats to her son on set.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Style stand outs at the Astra Awards

From Kerri-Anne Kennerley to Jennifer Hawkins, the stars really turned up the style heat on the Astra Awards red carpet in Sydney on Thursday night.

While most stars opted for glamorous black lace from designers like Roberto Cavalli and Dolce & Gabbana, others opted for a pop of gorgeous colour from bright reds to pretty pastel tones.

Check out the style stars who stole the show here!

Jennifer Hawkins

Days of our Lives star Kristian Alfonso.

Deborah Hutton

Darren McMullen and Crystal Reed

Kerri-Anne Kennerley

Lisa Wilkins

Marcia Hines

Nicole da Silva

Nicole Trunfio

The Real Housewives of Melbourne cast

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Our Down Syndrome story: ‘She taught me how to be a better person’

Author Peter Rix relives the moment his baby was born with Down syndrome and takes us on a journey of hope and love
Peter and Jenny Rix with their daughter Joanna.

Author Peter Rix relives the moment his baby was born with Down syndrome and takes us on a journey of hope and love, which prompted him to write his novel Water Under Water, inspired by his unique daughter, Joanna.

“I need to tell you, Mr Rix, this baby of yours … ” In a room off the maternity ward, the gynaecologist gives me the bare facts and hurries away. I stumble back along the corridor to the delivery room, stand at my wife Jenny’s bed, searching for the words to deliver the news.

That moment is as tangible for me today as it was 33 years ago. Many other moments, too, that followed hard on its heels; the first numbing hours of knowing, but not really knowing, dark, unfathomable days of struggling to get my head around a new language of alien words – for us back then, “mongoloid”, “retarded”, what is

a “syndrome” exactly?

And then weeks of feeling that, although Jenny and I were the same people we had always been, our lives had been stripped away and replaced with a confusion of questions and tears and desperation. There was the overwhelming sense, too, that nothing could ever be the same again.

Of course, it was never the same again, but looking back, it amuses and shames me to recall how self-satisfied, how complacent I must have been before our daughter, Joanna, was born with Down syndrome. And how unreasonably despondent I was afterwards.

Even in my ignorance, I must have known, surely, how much worse off than us so many other parents were? And that if they had survived, so could we. Or, more accurately, so could I.

Jenny found a combination of acceptance and strength that I could only marvel at. I am still unsure if that was just me, or if fathers generally, so proud, so full of expectations for their son or daughter, have more difficulty in bridging the gap between anticipation and reality.

How has it been then, to be the father of a child – a young woman now – with an intellectual disability?

Jo was born just as the dreadful, high-walled institutions that once housed people like her were being closed. And rightly so. Yet it has meant that as we cared for her in our family, every support service – childcare, schooling, respite care, meaningful employment – have all been hard won. We learned early on that there are never many votes in disabilities.

At a personal and family level, life with Jo has also been a roller-coaster ride of emotional highs and lows. I remember reading an article that included the learned statement: “Children with Down syndrome tend to be quiet and compliant, very loving, but unresponsive to stimuli.”

Quiet? Compliant? You must be joking! There I am with five-year-old Jo in the local mall. One second she’s right beside me and then she is gone. Vanished. How could any child disappear like that, let alone one supposed to be “unresponsive to stimuli”? I charge around in a frantic, futile search, then get security scouring the place.

When I call Jenny to confess, she calms me down … and sure enough, here comes Jo, wandering out from behind the counter of the ice-cream stand, holding aloft her triumphant double-scoop prize. My emotional outburst of frustration and relief is met with amazement.

“But Dad, I wasn’t lost, I was here all the time helping the ice-cream man.” And then an admonishment. “Maybe you were lost.”

It was always too easy to jump to conclusions with Jo. Take the “holiday ranch incident”.

Jo at nine, exploring while the rest of the family relaxes. Until we notice that someone has released all the hens from the chook run! It takes forever in the heat and chook-poop to round them up. Finally, we get them all back inside and Jo cops a serve from everyone.

Later, the ranch boss waggles his finger at us. “Those hens are free-range! You’ve put them right off their laying.”

“Disabilities people always get the blame,” Jo tells me tearfully and I learn a lesson about making assumptions.

Then there is the day that I can hardly bear to recall, years later, when she rages,

“Dad, you don’t know what it’s like for me in my life! Michael and Suzanne [her brother and sister] get to have everything, like uni and boyfriends and girlfriends and drivers’ licences and proper jobs, and I only get to do disability things.”

And yet, Jo works hard to carve out a life for herself. She persists as I could not. Every morning, she is up before dawn, showered, dressed and off to catch buses and trains before I am out of bed. She will be at the Sunnyfield factory, where she works, at least an hour before the gates open. “I need to be early,” she says, “so my bosses don’t get angry with me.”

Jo has always had expectations. She enrols in the summer holiday program at NIDA every year. She loves to act, but it’s not just that. She perseveres with her weekly singing lessons. She sits endlessly copying out Shakespearean soliloquies.

Jo has goals, you see, her sights set on Hollywood, or the Bell Theatre Company, or the latest musical. She perseveres with the dance steps and lines and costume designs, even though in her heart, I fear, she knows the call will not come. “I like to think about it in my brain,” she says. And the next morning, there is another note on my desk. “Dad, do you know Mr Spielberg’s address? I need to audition.”

We give her as much independence as we can. She shares that right with the rest of us, doesn’t she, to live a life that is useful, fulfilled and hopeful? As she said to me once, “I can do lots of things, but I can’t do anything about the Down syndrome.”

There are nearly 200,000 people in Australia who live with an intellectual disability. These people have brains that function differently from those that we consider “normal”. Not that they can be lumped into a single category, not the ones I have known, at least. They can amaze with feats of memory and calculation, wisdom and insight. They can be generous and mean-spirited, loving and hateful … just like the rest of us.

Although, perhaps there is one other thing our daughter does share with each of her peers – the desperate yearning to be just like her brother or sister, to not be limited to “disabilities things”.

For Jenny and I, and thousands of Australian parents like us, a new worry looms. Jo will outlive us. What happens to her when we are no longer around? We are luckier than many, her siblings will help to the extent they are able to.

Yet Jo needs to live close to the people she knows, the bus and train routes she knows, close to the shops and picture theatres and doctors and dentists she knows and where she is known.

Throughout Australia, there is a chronic shortage of appropriate supported-living housing for people like her. And even when we found three publicly owned derelict houses in our local area, our proposal to convert them was met by government indifference and a NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) campaign by a small group of residents which stunned us with its prejudice and downright meanness.

We’ll work it out, though, somehow. In the early days, I often used to wonder what Jo might have been without Down syndrome. To what purpose might she have turned her determination, her courage and love for life? I have learned not to think like that anymore.

Something else I have gained from her – you can only do what you can do and, eventually, that will be enough. Hopefully.

One of Jo’s great loves is to give speeches. Birthdays, end of year concerts, graduations … give Jo an audience and a microphone and she’ll be away.

At Jenny’s 50th, she waxed lyrical for ages, with me, the ever-anxious father, hovering nearby lest she blurt out some inappropriate family secret. As always, she had the audience eating out of her hand.

“On behalf of everyone here,” she finally wrapped it up, “I want to thank my favourite parents for having me.”

And I thank her, too, for many things over the past 33 years. Yet in the end, it is as simple as this – my daughter, Jo, showed me how to be a better person.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Our Down Syndrome story: ‘We refused to give up our beautiful boy’

Over 40 years ago, Kevin and Shirley Orr defied doctors and kept their baby with Down syndrome. Now, the caring roles have reversed and the real dilemma is this — what happens when Mum and Dad die?
Kevin, Shirley and Iain Orr.

Over 40 years ago, Kevin and Shirley Orr defied doctors and kept their baby with Down syndrome. Now, the caring roles have reversed and the real dilemma is this — what happens when Mum and Dad die?

Kevin Orr remembers well the joy running through the house the first day he brought his newborn son, Iain, home from the hospital.

It was 42 years ago, back in a time when children born with Down syndrome were routinely removed from their parents’ care.

“We were told it was best to send him to an institution,” recalls the 85-year-old Kevin.

“It would have been awful. I certainly can’t imagine my life without him. Looking back, he may have been the one thing that’s kept our family together.”

We’re sitting in the large family home in Blakehurst, in Sydney’s southern suburbs, that Kevin, a retired surgeon, shares with Iain.

It used to be filled with the noise of five children and was lovingly tended by Kevin’s wife and Iain’s mother, Shirley.

The children have all grown up and moved out and, in the last couple of years, dementia has forced Shirley to move into a nursing home.

The house was once Kevin’s domain, but he has since ceded control to Iain. The man whose stubborn determination to go against the prevailing medical wisdom of the time and raise his son has now come to rely on him. The carer has become the cared for.

“He insists on getting me ready for bed at night,” says Kevin, cataloguing his son’s capabilities.

“Iain’s very good at getting me a cup of tea and when we have a microwave meal, he puts mine in and gives it to me. He insists on doing that.”

“Because he always puts it in for three minutes,” interjects Iain. “And three minutes is too extreme. It’s smoking!”

When Iain was born and diagnosed with Down syndrome, Shirley wasn’t allowed to feed him. Doctors insisted that no contact be made between mother and child within the first few weeks and the family were advised to send Iain to an institution.

Yet, for the Orrs, their son wasn’t just disabled or handicapped, he was their beautiful boy deserving more than an institution to grow up in.

“We weren’t going to give up,” recalls Kevin. “He was going to be as good as he could be. We were quite determined.”

And so, as the years have progressed and thanks to the love and patience of his parents, Iain has forged a relatively independent life.

“In some ways, you could say it’s not really the best thing for a disabled person to stay at home and be bound from having their own life, but they’re definitely a close threesome,” says Iain’s eldest sister, Sandra, of her brother and parents.

Yet while the three of them maintain a close relationship, with Shirley visiting regularly, Kevin is well aware that Iain may soon be on his own. And it’s a thought that preoccupies him.

“Of course, you have concerns. He’s lived in this house his entire life, always with family, but I know he’ll be okay in the end. He’s quite incredible,” says Kevin.

“Iain doesn’t want to move from here and I don’t want the house to be sold. But it’s a big house for one person and Iain couldn’t live here on his own.”

With four siblings, 15 nieces and nephews and four great-nieces and nephews, Kevin knows Iain won’t be alone — but hopes one of his siblings will move in.

Meanwhile, though, the pair of them muddle along in their way, growing old together, their bond becoming greater with every week that passes.

When Shirley was still living at home and as dementia took hold, she was prone to mood swings, often lashing out at her husband. Iain, described by his family as a serial “mummy’s boy”, often sided with her.

Yet when the coast was clear and his mother was tucked in bed, the “mummy’s boy” would cuddle his father and softly say, “You understand”. And Kevin did.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

First pictures of possible MH370 wreckage

One of the objects suspected to be part of the wreckage of flight MH370.

One of the objects suspected to be part of the wreckage of flight MH370.

The Australian Maritime Search Authority has released satellite images it believes could be the wreckage of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.

AMSA posted the images on its website this afternoon. They show several objects – some as large as 24 metres in length – suspected to be parts of the fuselage of the plane. The pieces are floating in the Indian Ocean 2700km south-west of Perth.

The pictures were captured two days ago, meaning the wreckage could have shifted in the days since, complicating the identification and recovery mission.

Aircraft and navy vessels are currently travelling to the area to attempt to confirm whether the objects are related to the mysterious plane.

Satellite images of the possible wreckage of flight MH370.

Satellite images of the possible wreckage of flight MH370.

Satellite images of the possible wreckage of flight MH370.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Seven reasons MH370 could have crashed

If Australian authorities have found the wreckage of flight MH370, what is it doing off the coast of Perth and why did it crash? Here are some of the current theories circulating the internet.

Pilot sabotage: Malaysian authorities have confirmed that they have searched the residence of Capitan Zaharie Ahmad Shah, 53, and seized a home-built flight simulator that was in the veteran pilot’s home. Friends of Shah, who has been flying for Malaysia Airlines since 1981, told reporters the pilot was a “loving and generous” father of three.

While it was widely reported that 53-year-old Shah went to the court where Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim was jailed on the day of the flight, his friends say while he was a committed supporter he was not a “fanatic”.

However, some of the speculation surrounding the pilot has to do with the planes transponder which stopped relaying its position to air-traffic controllers and other planes at the most opportune moment during the flights hand-off from Malaysia’s controllers to those in Vietnam.

Suspicions about the staggered shut down of crucial communication and tracking devices also lead some the wonder about pilot involvement.“All right, good night,” was the calm final transmission from the plane’s co-pilot, Fariq Abdul Hamid, to Malaysian controllers and shortly after the transponder shut off and Vietnamese controllers were never contacted. The aircraft was abruptly turned and then kept flying for up to seven hours.

Investigators also confirmed that Shah was not the only crew member under investigation. The Malaysian Government has looked into all aircrew on board the Boeing 777, including Hamid, 27, who had just started flying the 777.

Terrorist hijacking: In the early days of the flight’s disappearance it was discovered that two passengers travelling on board the passenger jet were travelling on stolen passports which led to terrorism fears.

It came to be known that that the two individuals travelling on the illegal documents were two Iranian men— one 18, the other 28 — who had only purchased one way tickets.

This theory was then widely discounted when investigators failed to uncover any evidence linking either traveller to terror groups; it is believed they were friends and were hoping to seek asylum in Europe.

“The more information we get, the more we are inclined to conclude it was not a terrorist incident,” said Interpol’s head, Ronald Noble.

Sudden mechanical catastrophe: This was one of the initial theories presented by aeronautical experts looking into the crash who suspected that something abrupt and horrific had happened.

Perhaps a failure with the engines or an explosion? According to crash experts if a sudden catastrophe did occur then investigators say that it would be likely that aircraft debris would have been found in the spot where the transponder stopped signalling.

Fire: Billie Vincent, a forensic witness in the Lockerbie bombing trial, suggests a fire could have broken out.

“The data released thus far most likely points to a problem with hazardous materials,” Vincent has said. “This scenario begins with the eruption of hazardous materials within the cargo hold – either improperly packaged or illegally shipped – or both.”

If cargo caught alight and damaged communication systems, rendering them useless to signal for help this could explain the planes silence and the aircraft’s change of direction.

Decompression: Whether it be slow or sudden, the loss of oxygen on an aircraft would be capable of killing all on board.

If air levels suddenly dropped loud alarms would have sounded and oxygen marks would have dropped, and the pilots would have known to descend to below 10,000 feet immediately.

Should the aircraft have de-pressurised and killed its occupants, that would explain the silence, but experts say the Boeing 777 should have kept flying on auto-pilot towards Beijing and would have still been transmitting radar data.

Plane has landed somewhere: According to experts the plane veered wildly off course and flew for 7 hours after the transponder shut off.

“It changed course after Kota Bharu and took a lower altitude. It made it into the Malacca Strait,” a military official, who has been briefed on investigations, said.

There was also speculation that the plane had engaged in ‘terrain masking’, a military tactic used by pilots on stealth missions, to avoid radar detection. This led to theories that someone on board had taken the plane off its planned route deliberately to land it somewhere else.

Without a wreckage it is possible that the plane has landed somewhere remote and deliberately avoiding detection but experts do warn it would be extremely difficult to land a 777 at a small airport without normal navigation guides.

An accidental shoot-down: In the past there have been instances where civilian aircraft have been unintentionally shot down by a country’s military.

The United States Navy missile cruiser USS Vincennes infamously shot down an Iran Air flight, killing all 290 souls on board in July, 1988. A Korean Air Lines flight suffered a similar fate in 1983 when it was shot down by a Russian fighter jet.

There is no evidence that Flight 370 was brought down by a government entity.

For the families of the missing it has been a painful roller-coaster of emotion and a lack of information has been adding insult to injury. While Australian authorities believe the debris spotted is “credible sightings” of the missing plane, officials are hesitant to comment any further until search planes arrive on the scene later tonight.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Who is heading up Australia’s search for MH370?

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority's John Young.

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority's John Young.

Their press conference about the missing Malaysia Airlines plane is currently being beamed around the world – so who are John Young and John McGarry?

An experienced and well-respected member of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority, John Young has spearheaded numerous emergency search and rescues throughout the Asia-Pacific region.

He has been at the centre of the search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 since intelligence led to focus turning to waters off the Australian coast within the past week.

Related: Aussies experts think they’re found wreckage of missing plane

In pictures: People, not numbers – the faces of MH370Related: Aussies searching for survivors of MH370   

Since then, he has applied a logical, thorough and methodical approach to the 600,000 square km search, which he agreed was like “a needle in a haystack”.

Although he insisted it was possible the debris found today may not be from the missing plane, the fact he fronted a press conference about the finding is a strong indicator that the evidence is robust.

John was involved in the search and rescue operation surrounding the Russian expedition ship Akademik Shokalskiy, which became trapped in ice in Antarctica with 53 passengers earlier this year.

He and his division also fields calls from asylum seekers in distress in overcrowded boats.

As general manager of emergency response since 2008, John has responsibility for co-ordinating search and rescues, training and planning.

John Young and John McGarry addressing the media.

John Young and John McGarry addressing the media.

John Young and John McGarry addressing the media.

The other major figure in the Australia search is Air Commodore John McGarry, director general of Australian Defence Force’s military strategic affairs.

With a key role in military surveillance, Air Commodore John McGarry worked alongside AMSA in locating the suspected debris from missing Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 on satellite images.

Describing the sighting as “a promising lead” in the 12-day search, he is co-ordinating the dispatching of multiple military aircraft to the potential crash site 2,500km south west off the coast of Perth.

A Royal Australian Air Force Orion aircraft arrived at the suspected site at 1.50pm today and other aircraft and naval ships, which are well-equipped to lead a recovery mission, are en route.

Related: Aussies experts think they’re found wreckage of missing plane

In pictures: People, not numbers – the faces of MH370Related: Aussies searching for survivors of MH370   

Based in Canberra, well-liked John works closely with the Federal Government. He provides “accurate and timely” advice to the Minister for Defence, Senator David Johnston, on operational deployments and reviews of all current operations.

At today’s press conference, he said China had expressed interest in aiding the search following the Australian discovery.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 4462

Aussies ‘searching for survivors’ of MH370

John Young addressing the press.

Australian authorities are searching for survivors of the missing Malaysian Airlines flight 370 in the ocean off Perth.

Australian Maritime Search Authority (AMSA) spokesman John Young told a press conference that RAAF personnel were “doing their level best” to find and rescue any passengers who may have survived whatever happened to the plane.

Related: Aussies experts think they’re found wreckage of missing plane

In pictures: People, not numbers – the faces of MH370

Related: Who is heading up our hunt for MH370? 

He said several aircraft and vessels were on their way to an area in the Indian Ocean 2700km south-west of Perth after satellite images appeared to show objects – some as large as 24 metres in length – they suspected were the wreckage of the mystery plane.

Mr Young said the objects may be difficult to find and that they may not be related to MH370.

“The objects are relatively indistinct on the imagery,” he said. “I don’t profess to be an expert in assessing the imagery, but those who are expert indicate they are credible sightings.

“The indication to me is of objects that are a reasonable size and probably awash with water bobbing up and down under the surface.”

Related stories


Advertisement