Kids can be pretty cute, can’t they? Mispronouncing words, getting mixed up… dropping us in it…

Well, maybe they’re not quite so cute when they drop us in it. But from the evidence in a recent Mumsnet thread, it’s something they are very good at.

After Mumsnetter SweetAngels experienced a moment of excruciating embarrassment, she posted her story on the popular parenting site.

“Was shopping with my [4-year-old daughter] this morning, decided to stop by a cafe for lunch and drop her straight to nursery after – ordered food and drinks. I asked for a cappuccino with soya milk as I have a dairy intolerance.

“I am convinced that the lady used normal milk as within 30min I needed the loo badly (sorry [too much information] I know) so had to stop by the house to use the bathroom.

“We were 30min late for nursery and as we walked in one of the ladies asked [daughter] if she was OK, to which [daughter] casually replied ‘we’re only ever late when mummy has to go home for a poo’.

“I was absolutely mortified – I wanted the ground to swallow me up and I did the decent thing and asked a friend to pick her up this afternoon so I don’t have to face them!”

SweetAngels then asked other mums to spill the beans on the times their darling children had “outed them” in public.

It turns out that lots of mums could relate.

One said: “My [darling son] answered the door to the window cleaner once and said mummy was just having her afternoon poo!”

Of course poo stories are just the start of it. Our little ones have lots of different ways to embarrass us. Here are our favourite ones:

“My [10-year-old son] told a whole group of people ‘mummy had a beard once but she plucked it out!’”

“When my youngest was 2, she happily piped up to tell the cashier at Tesco, ‘Mummy’s got to buy knickers because she’s going commando!'”

“[I was ] in a cubicle quickly changing a tampon when [my son] was around and he screeched ‘mummy! Do not put that crayon up your bottom. What are you playing at?’ cue snickering from other cubicles and me hurriedly explaining it wasn’t a crayon, it was to stop me from bleeding.

“He threw me a dirty look and indignantly called out ‘well your bottom wouldn’t be bleeding if you didn’t put crayons up there!’.

But we think this one wins…

“My [five-year-old-son] told his school that daddy gave him white powder to make him stay awake all night. On hearing this, the school immediately called social services, who called the police.

“[My husband] was arrested on suspicion of supplying drugs, our house was searched and [our son] had to be interviewed on video by child protection officers.”

“What [my husband] had actually given him was a sherbet fountain and said, ‘I shouldn’t let you have that this close to bedtime; you’ll be awake half the night!’

“So that was fun.”

Have your kids ever said anything that made you wish the ground could swallow you up? Tell us on Facebook

You may also like: ‘Ghost’ captured on video in creepy hospital

Now to Love

Related stories

Previous

This could mean cheaper prices at Woolies

Native ad body.

Sponsored by %%sponsor_name%%

Family and community farewell domestic violence victim Tina Kontozis

Next

Discovery Girls, a magazine aimed at tween girls ages 8 and up, has come under fire from angry parents after it offered some totally unnecessary advice to young girls about what swimsuits would flatter their figures best.

The fashion spread basically divided girls into four categories based on their “body types” and dished out tips. Girls who were ‘curvy up top’ were told to try a full-piece with ‘side ties and cutouts that draw the eyes down,’ – which makes us wonder whose “eyes”?! Whose eyes being drawn to little girls in bathing suits need to be distracted down?!

Punters took to twitter to voice their anger:

@taffyakner wrote, “Hey @DiscoveryGirls, why not include diet tips/surgical options with this? Your readers are 9, after all. Tick tock.”

And @rhiannonlucyc commented, “Weeping for my future daughters. This mag @discoverygirls is for girls 8+”.

So why would a magazine for very young girls be dishing out advice based on body type? Well not even the magazine’s publisher is sure why.

Discovery Girls’ publisher, Catherine Lee issued a lengthy open letter on Facebookaddressing the article and said she wasn’t sure who gave the final OK to an article like this.

“It’s still hard for me to believe that an article so contrary to our magazine’s mission could have been published on our pages,” wrote Lee.

She also said the initial idea was to showcase “cute, fun swimsuits that make girls feel confident,” but even that might not have been right for 8-year-olds because the kind of swimmers a kid that age that should be in should just be the one she likes, regardless of “body type”.

Now to Love

Related stories

Previous

Mother of quintuplets shares beautiful photos

Native ad body.

Sponsored by %%sponsor_name%%

Would you donate your child’s organs?

Next