Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Married at First Sight’s Erin loses licence

“Don’t be a f--king idiot behind the wheel of a car like I was.”
Married at First Sight’s Erin loses licence

Married at First Sight star Erin Bateman has had her licence suspended for six months.

The 25-year-old, who is still together with her ‘husband’ Bryce, took to Instagram to share the news with her fans.

“Hey everyone, not a traditional ‘Erin Post’ today…” she wrote.

“The 24/06/16 marks my first day of me not having a license. When I was younger I made a lot of stupid decisions and never truly understood the consequences of my actions. Today all of my stupidity has caught up with me, and what has been 3 years of mistakes in the making has resulted in me losing my drivers license for 6 months.”

Erin and ‘husband’ Bryce.

“All I can say is how ashamed I am that as a young adult I didn’t put my own safety and the safety of others before ‘getting somewhere fast’ and today I pay the price for that.

“I’m not going to fight this, make excuses or even complain, I’m going to wear it and learn. Don’t be a f–king idiot behind the wheel of a car like I was, be safe so your loved ones never have to worry about you.”

She finished the post with a series of hashtags including #drivesafe and #publictransportadventuresstartnow

Loading the player...

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Beyonce, Jay Z and Rachel Roy attended the 2016 CFDA Awards

Well, prepare sip on your tea! Beyonce, Jay Z and Rachel Roy were all under the same roof post Lemonade… and nothing imploded.
Beyonce, Jay Z and Rachel Roy

The Queen of Pop received a brand-new crown after she was honoured with the Fashion Icon award at the 2016 CFDA Awards.

Watching on proudly from the crowd was daughter Blue Ivy and her hubby Jay Z. Also sitting among Hollywood’s glitterati was none other than fashion designer and rumoured “Becky with good hair”, Rachel Roy.

Beyonce stunned as she received her award.

But it was her darling girl that stole the show!

Beyonce infamously penned her song “Sorry” which alluded to her hubby’s infidelity… Becky, we mean Rachel, has denied any part of it.

In fact, the last time the trio have been together was at the 2014 Met Gala.

For those who may have forgotten, that’s when Bey’s sister Solange Knowles threw some major ninja kicks at her brother-in-law while in an elevator.

The rumoured reason? Stylist Rachel Roy.

With her hair looking mighty fine in a sleek pony, the 42-year-old fashionista kept a low profile.

“She was one of the only celebs to not walk the carpet,” an onlooker told Us Weekly.

Rachel kept a very low profile as she posed with her date and friend, model Candice Huffine – who of course donned one of the designer’s signature pieces.

Jay Z, on the other hand, relished a night out with his favourite girls.

With his wife and daughter by his side, the family stopped for a quick red carpet photo before making their way into the stylish award ceremony.

Check out Blue’s very sweet entrance in the video player below. Post continues…

Loading the player...

Also joining the family was the Formation singer’s mama, Tina Knowles.

But we think her little four-year-old was the real star of the show, donning the sweetest little white jacket and bow in her hair, waving and smiling to the fans.

Receiving the huge award of the night, always the diplomat, Beyonce dedicated her award to her grandma, her uncle and of course her mum, who she cited as the inspiration behind her love of fashion.

How adorable is Blue!

Meanwhile her mama is channeling some major Sasha Fierce.

“My mother actually designed my wedding dress, my prom dress, my first CFDA Award dress, my first Grammy dress—and the list goes on and on,” she said during her acceptance speech as Jay Z and Blue Ivy watched on proudly.

“Thank you for showing me that having a presence is far more than the clothes you wear and your physical beauty.”

Watch Beyonce’s incredible speech in the video player at the top of the article!

Can you imagine if Solange was also there? #Dreams

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Is Prince Harry secretly dating Ellie Goulding?

The Prince and the popstar has a rather nice ring to it!
Prince Harry and Ellie Goulding

According to a new report from The Sun, Prince Harry, 31, and Ellie Goulding, 29, have hit it off!

The British pair reportedly flirted the day away when they attended the Audi Polo challenge in Berkshire recently.

Witnesses told the publication the duo were “all over each other” and they even shared a clandestine kiss beneath a blanket.

Things allegedly got even steamier at the after party. “Harry was really going for it after the polo – he was drinking and dancing,” the source explained to The Sun.

“They were part of a wider group including Tom Hardy but Harry and Ellie only had eyes for each other all night – they spent a lot of time sitting together under blankets,” they continued.

Witnesses claim they wrapped up the evening with one final smooch and then “Harry had to go because he was playing polo the next day. Ellie left about five minutes later.”

Prince Harry cheekily watches on as Ellie presents the team with a bouquet at the Audi Polo Challenge last month.

The report goes on to claim that the pair are now “secretly courting” following their romantic evening.

“He has told friends how much he likes Ellie and she is clearly taken by him,” a source said, before revealing they are in regular contact via text message.

Indeed, the pair have been long-standing friends with Ellie performing at Prince William and Duchess Catherine’s wedding in 2011. Ellie was also in attendance at the closing ceremony for the 2014 Invictus Games.

Harry and Ellie share a hug at the 2014 Invictus Games.

Just last month the single royal admitted he can’t wait to find The One.

“If or when I do find a girlfriend, I will do my utmost to ensure that me and her can get to the point where we’re actually comfortable with each other before the massive invasion that is inevitably going to happen into her privacy,” Harry told The Sunday Times.

Harry’s ex-girlfriends include Chelsea Davy and Cressida Bonas. Meanwhile Ellie has previously dated stars like Niall Horan, Ed Sheeran and Dougie Poynter.

Loading the player...

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban’s sweet night out

Australia’s sweethearts revealed their children’s red carpet ritual as they attended the premiere of Nic's new film Genius in New York.
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban

Despite flying into the city with their two daughters Sunday Rose, seven, and Faith, five, the Aussie lovebirds walked the red carpet alone, holding hands the entire way.

Speaking to People, the 48-year-old parents revealed their little ones weren’t too far away.

“Hopefully, they’re at the hotel watching Shrek right now,” Keith explained outside the Museum of Modern Art.

“Shrek Forever After,” added mum Nicole.

The pair posed with their signature snuggle.

Nicole, who stunned onlookers in an intricately embellished black gown by Rodarte, was inseparable from her husband who put on his best suit and tie in support of his wife on her big night.

The country singer stood beside the strawberry blonde beauty who plays Aline Bernstein in the film; a costume designer who begins an affair with author Thomas Wolfe, played by Jude Law.

Keith stood back in awe of his stunning wife, who owned the red carpet.

Fans will remember Keith and Nicole’s memorable lip-syncing video that graced the internet last month.

In the goofy yet adorable clip, the married couple belt out the track Fighter from the father-of-two’s latest album Ripcord while sitting in the front seat of their car.

Relive the magic of the dorky clip in the video player below! Post continues…

Loading the player...

When asked if their daughters take after their parents by also lip-syncing along to Keith’s tracks, the Moulin Rouge actress consulted her beau, “Do they, baby?”

“No, they sing, and play,” she recalled.

Keith and Nicole tied the knot in Sydney on June 25, 2006, meaning that this year marks their 10th wedding anniversary.

Speaking of this coveted Hollywood milestone, the handsome hitmaker said to Today, “I think it’s about 30 in Hollywood years. I feel incredibly grateful.”

The pair share two sweet girls together.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Brock Turner – there’s no such thing as a ‘respectable’ rapist

As friends of Brock Turner, the former Stanford University student convicted of rape, defend his actions, The Australian Women's Weekly Online's Lana Hirschowitz says it’s time we stop victim blaming

On the weekend I read Brock Turner’s victim’s statement.

It was staggering in its strength, its power, its frank and reasoned wording.

It is something I hope everyone gets to read at some time.

As a woman who’s known men like Brock Turner I am hugely grateful to her for every word of that statement.

Then, as most of you would have, I read the hideous words of Brock Turner’s father.

A small man who spoke with such entitlement and privilege it made it hard to follow.

His son has clearly learned his lack of respect and basic humanity from his father.

But it gets worse.

Because now a letter that Brock Turner’s friend wrote to The Honourable Judge Aaron Persky has emerged.

A letter in which his friend Leslie Rasmussen defends Brock’s character.

“Brock is such a sweetheart and a very smart kid” she writes.

“I never caught him harassing anyone, verbally or physically. That would have been so out of character”.

In the letter Lesie says Brock came from a very respectable family, “I also know his sister Caroline. They all seem like such good kids brought up by two very cool and grounded parents”.

Because a rapist would never come from a respectable family would they?

But the thing we know, even if Leslie doesn’t, is that even if Brock’s family were a good family, which his father’s letter points against, it doesn’t mean that he didn’t take advantage of a woman and rape her behind a dumpster.

I went to a “good” school, an elite school where parents paid fortunes for a private education.

Presented in their school ties and blazers the boys from my wealthy suburban school looked the part.

But there were boys amongst them, young men from prestigious backgrounds that treated girls with the most foul and abusive behaviour.

Demands of sex, unwanted touching and non-consensual sex, this was the thrill for of some of these “well bred boys”. No blazers and ties were worn then. Nothing made them look good and proper when they were taking what they thought belonged to them.

Good breeding, expensive clothing, going home to a mansion and having excess cash don’t dictate behaviour.

That is dictated by the kind of person you are.

I look back to my days at school and I wonder what the girls like Leslie Rasmussen were thinking.

I wonder how they smiled and chatted idly with these boys who would go back to the party and mingle with them after they had just sexually abused one of her classmates.

Leslie Rasmussen writes “I don’t think it’s fair to base the fate of the next ten years of his life on the decision of a girl who doesn’t remember anything but the amount she drank to press charges against him. I am not blaming her directly for this, because that isn’t right. But where do we draw the line and stop worrying about being politically correct every second of the day and see that rape on campuses isn’t always because people are rapists. “

I will tell you where we draw the line Leslie, we draw the line when a person touches another person without consent.

When a man rapes a woman whether she is awake, asleep, unconscious or comatose that is rape.

Rape on campuses are always about people being rapists. Only rapists rape. Even privileged rich ones.

“This is completely different from a woman getting kidnapped and raped as she is walking to her car in a parking lot” writes Leslie “That is a rapist. These are not rapists. These are idiot boys and girls having too much to drink and not being aware of their surroundings and having clouded judgement.”

The only judgment clouded here is the people who promote rape culture.

I only hope that all the Leslies’ out there never have to learn the difference between being raped by a boy at school and being raped by a stranger in the car park.

Because at the end of the day, there is no difference.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

How Australians die

Cancer is one of the top five causes of death in Australia. So how can we drive down rates of these illnesses?

Described as “The Emperor of All Maladies” by Pulitzer Prize-winning author and researcher Siddartha Mukherjee, cancer is often seen as a modern disease. But scientists have found evidence of it in dinosaur fossils and human cases appear in literature spanning four millennia.

The Egyptian physician Imhotep vividly described advanced breast cancer in 2600 BC as “a bulging mass in the breast”: cool, hard and spreading beneath the skin. Under the section “Therapy”, Imhotep solemnly recorded: “There is none.”

An early modern publication on cancer comes from 1818. Written by physician George Wagstaff, it includes a number of gruesome case studies such as that of “fungus haematodes”, or blood fungus in the lungs.

Since then, more than three million scientific papers have been published on the subject, 159,000 of them in 2015 alone.

Between 1968 and 2013 cancer deaths in Australia increased from 17,032 to 44,308, a rise of 160%. However, taking into account the increase in population (94%) and the increase in average age (34%) over the same period, there has been a decline in the age-standardised cancer death rate overall in Australia. The chance of a cancer death before the age of 75 in 1968 was 12.8%. This has fallen to 9.4% in 2013.

Cancer is made up of around 200 distinct illnesses united by the uncontrolled growth of human cells. The diversity of mechanisms by which different cancer types both grow and evade treatment means that many separate breakthroughs will be required to combat all cancers.

Currently, seven cancer types are listed in the top 20 causes of death in Australia. These are cancers of the lung, blood and lymph, bowel, prostate, breast, pancreas and skin.

Lung cancer

This is the number one cancer killer, ranking number four in overall causes of death. Most (80%) lung cancers are still attributable to tobacco smoking, either directly or through passive smoking. Australia is leading the world in reducing smoking rates and fewer than 13% of Australian adults now smoke, with fewer lung cancer cases as a result.

Sadly, lung cancer survival remains poor due in part to late detection. Less than 15% of people are still alive five years after diagnosis although new immunotherapy treatments that help the immune system destroy cancer cells are prolonging survival for some patients.

Also, trials screening people at high risk, particularly smokers, using chest CT scans are showing promise in catching the disease earlier and at a more curable stage.

Blood and lymph cancer (including leukaemia)

Cancers of the lymph glands (lymphomas) affect the body’s infection fighting mechanism and come in two types: Hodgkin and Non Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood cancers are called leukaemia and classified as either acute (fast growing) or chronic (slow growing).

Combined, these cancers are referred to as haematological cancers and they caused 4,275 deaths in Australia in 2013 (made up mostly of lymphoma and leukaemia caused deaths). For each, there are sub types with different features, treatments and survival rates. Little is known about the causes of these cancers but survival is improving for many types.

Large bowel cancer

In 2014, 4,169 people died of bowel cancer (0.9% chance of death before age 75) compared to 2,500 in 1968 (1.9%). These cancers can often be treated successfully if found early through faecal blood testing such as in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.

However, since the program began in 2006, only 40% of those invited have done the test. Despite men being diagnosed more, at a later stage and being more likely to die from bowel cancer, they are less likely than women to participate.

Prostate cancer

In 2014, 3,102 Australian men died of prostate cancer, up from 963 in 1968. Diagnosis and death are rare for those under 50 but the disease becomes increasingly common in older men with over half of prostate cancer deaths occurring after 80. Causes are unknown making preventative options hard to identify.

Although diagnosis is common, only one in six men who are diagnosed die of prostate cancer. The five year survival rates exceed 90%, giving prostate cancer the reputation of being a disease one dies with rather than from. However the large number of cases, particularly in much older men, mean it remains a major cancer killer.

More breast cancers are not being detected at a curable stage. from shutterstock.com

Surgery and radiotherapy are the most common treatments. Hormone therapy, recently combined at the beginning with chemotherapy, can often control more widespread disease for long periods.

Breast cancer

Perhaps the highest-profile cancer, progress in breast cancer has been strong. However, 2,844 Australians, including about 30 men, still died of breast cancer in 2014 in Australia.

Breast cancer is now divided into different sub-types, each with its own behaviour. Understanding this has allowed more personalised therapy for many patients, which has improved treatment outcomes.

Mammographic screening has attracted some controversy because of possible over-diagnosis. But with participation rates well above 50%, and more cancers being detected at more curable stages, it has likely contributed to the rise of five year survivals to 90%.

Pancreatic cancer

Little progress has been made in pancreatic cancer that took 2,547 Australians in 2014, compared to 797 in 1968. Smoking, obesity and some pesticides can contribute to pancreatic cancer risk.

An absence of signs and tests make early detection uncommon and little progress has been made in identifying important drivers of pancreatic cancer growth. As diagnosis often occurs at an advanced stage and focused treatments are lacking, outcomes are poor with a five year survival rate of only 5%.

Skin cancers

Melanoma is the leading cause of skin cancer deaths. Of the 2,067 skin cancer deaths, approximately 1,600 were due to melanoma while non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), a far more common but less lethal form, claimed the others in 2014. Excessive ultraviolet radiation from sunlight remains the main cause for both.

Recently, New Zealand surpassed Australia as the number one skin cancer nation in the world. Melanoma cases are falling in Australia, probably due to prevention efforts.

Generally, treatment of early stage disease is highly successful with a greater than 95% five year survival rate. Even for advanced melanoma, new immunotherapy treatments are increasing survival times.

This article was originally published on The Conversation.

About the authors:

Terry Slevin, Adjunct Professor, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University; Education and Research Director, Cancer Council WA; Chair, Occupational and Environmental Cancer Committee, Cancer Council Australia

Andrew Redfern

Senior Lecturer, University of Western Australia

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

I was pregnant when I found out I had skin cancer

Deb Herdman had been relaxed about getting a skin lesion checked, but in the same month she discovered she was pregnant she found out it was cancer.

I had noticed a small discoloured spot on my forehead but I didn’t get around to getting it looked at very early which is a bit silly. I have very fair skin, and I’d spent a lot of time in the sun riding horses as a kid.

It was small, a tiny spot really, and I mostly just covered it with my fringe. I wasn’t too worried, but it was something I planned on getting around to dealing with.

I finally got my GP to look at it. He didn’t seem overly concerned but he suggested I get a skin specialist to look at it. I’d had a few basal cell carcinomas removed but they’re the least scary of the skin cancers and it didn’t occur to me that this might be serious.

I saw a surgeon and he thought it would be difficult to surgically remove the lesion because the skin on my forehead was so tight but we still wanted to remove it, we just needed to work out how we were going to deal with it.

It was eight years ago, and I think everyone is more alert now, but none of the specialists really gave me any sense of urgency with it.

I got it looked at by a specialist again a couple of months later and we realised that it was too big to freeze it off and they diagnosed it as a squamous cell carcinoma. It had to go, and the doctors thought the most effective method of removal would be radiotherapy but right in the middle of this all I discovered I was pregnant.

They refused to treat it while I was pregnant so I had to wait.

My morning sickness was out of control for the entire nine months so although I could see the lesion on my forehead was changing I couldn’t give it too much thought as I was too busy trying to get through the tough pregnancy.

The cancer became larger due to the pregnancy hormones and although the doctors had warned me that this was likely, it was still confronting. It grew from a small freckle size to the size of a five cent piece.

When my baby was six weeks old I started radiotherapy, where every week for six weeks I went in for treatment, and then I was given the all clear shortly after.

The doctors gave me the impression that it wasn’t something I needed to worry about further. My cancer was gone so moving forward it wouldn’t be an issue but I have since found out that’s not the case at all.

My mother also had a squamous cell carcinoma removed from her face, but later she was diagnosed with a secondary cancer from that one. It had spread into her neck and lymph nodes and ultimately it killed her.

I can remember numerous times where I was sunburned to the point of blistering as a kid, mostly through carelessness and lack of knowledge. We just didn’t have the same sun screening awareness that we have today. I was super vigilant with sun screening my kids and even now I still check my skin regularly and have anything odd checked straight away.

I think it’s important that people realise that sun safety is not just when you’re in the sun. I’ve badly been burned sitting in the shade so it’s important to remember that any time you’re outside you’re at risk.

HOW TO SPOT A SKIN CANCER

According to SkinChecker dermatologists use two visual methods for initial evaluation to identify if a lesion is normal or suspect.

The ABCDE method

A – Asymetry

If you put a line down the middle would the two halves match?

B – Border

Irregular, wavy or jagged border clearly defined against the rest of the skin.

C – Color

Uneven colour. Light brown to black.

D – Diameter

Is it bigger than 6mm?

E – Evolution

Rapid evolution of size, width, or thickness.

The Ugly Duckling Method

One person’s moles are often similar in appearance. They look very alike with the same shape, colour and thickness. A new pigmented lesion can be considered suspect if it has a different appearance from the other moles. This is known as the “ugly duckling”.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Are you raising a paedophile?

What causes paedophilia and what can we do about it?

Growing up, Bobby* was a quiet and reserved child. His mother Anne sensed he was a bit different from his elder brothers and encouraged him to purse his artistic interests. Yet as he grew older, he seemed increasingly uncomfortable in his own skin – as if he was holding part of himself back. His mum put it down to the awkwardness of adolescence.

Maybe he was figuring out his sexuality: it had crossed her mind that Bobby might be gay, although there hadn’t been any romantic interests that she was aware of. With a mop of sandy hair, freckles and a shy smile, he was popular among his peers at his local church youth group.

It was here that he seemed to have found his calling, putting up his hand to volunteer with the church’s outreach services and as a youth leader. The kids loved him: he always gave them his full attention and made them feel special. At summer camp, Bobby was a Pied Piper with a swarm of adoring children in his wake.

Although he hadn’t found a career, drifting between daytime jobs in customer service and retail, Anne was relieved he appeared to be finding his way in life. Until the day she got a phone call that would bring her regular suburban life to a sickening halt.

Bobby had been charged with sexually abusing a seven-year-old girl – and police suspected there were others.

Retching and shaking, Anne dropped to the floor. Her mind raced through a lifetime of memories of her youngest son, desperately looking for clues or signs that he had the capacity to betray a child’s innocence in such a heinous way. How had she failed him? What went wrong? How had it come to this?

Paedophilia, a word of Greek origin meaning “child love”, is a disorder defined by a persistent and dominant sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. It affects about 1 to 2 per cent of the male population, plus a much smaller fraction of women.

There has been much debate over its cause, with theories ranging from psychological problems and pornography to celibacy and past sexual abuse. Yet science increasingly points to it being part of our biology – in other words, some people argue they are simply born that way.

Some clues have emerged to suggest it is innate: paedophiles tend to be shorter, for example, have a lower IQ and are three times more likely to be left-handed. MRI scans show they also have less connective tissue in the brain, with some scientists speculating that areas which govern their sexual and nurturing responses could be cross-wired.

This doesn’t, of course, mean we need to be wary of all people with these physical traits – it just indicates paedophilia could be rooted in our genetic blueprint before birth.

As part of its investigation, The Weekly tracked down and spoke to several men who identified as paedophiles. Nicholas, a married father-of-four, admits to being attracted to boys aged 12 to 14, but says he’s never acted on his urges.

“No-one chooses to be sexually attracted to children,” he says. “And those of us who are unlucky enough to be sexually attracted to children can’t [make it go away]. But many of us can and do successfully resist our attraction.”

Like Nicholas, who is part of an online support network, many paedophiles do not surrender to their impulses and abuse children. Conversely, not all child molesters are paedophiles. Some are opportunistic predators or sociopaths, who will target victims perceived to be easy prey. Aside from children, this could include disabled, drunk or elderly people.

In the past couple of months, a wave of high-profile cases of child sex abuse have left many of us horrified.

These cases are only the tip of the iceberg, as many victims don’t report sexual abuse or pursue their case through court because of shame and fear. A chilling disclosure by police that goes some way to illustrate the unknown quantity of child sex abuse in the community came following the abduction of Daniel Morcombe from a bus stop on the Sunshine Coast. Investigating police have since revealed there were at least 30 known child sex offenders in the vicinity on the day Daniel disappeared.

Gerald Ridsdale.

So can paedophiles ever be cured? The short answer is no – there has never been a proven case of someone who is attracted to children being converted into someone who is only attracted to adults. It’s more like a sexual orientation, but it can be controlled.

Nicholas, who admits his attraction to boys is far more powerful than any physical desire he’s ever felt towards his wife, compares it to diabetes. “It’s a serious chronic condition,” he says, “but a manageable one.”

He has kept his urges secret all his life, apart from confiding in a counsellor, and even today his family, including his wife, has no idea.

“I think I have a strong moral compass,” he says. “I realise that lots of kids have been hurt as a result of being sexually molested and I refuse to do anything that would hurt a child. In terms of strategies, I avoid being alone with kids that I find attractive. I’m sure nothing would happen, but I think it’s a prudent precaution.”

Nicholas knows what it’s like to experience sexual abuse as a child. At 12, he was molested by a camp counsellor.

“I’ve always suspected that this might have played a role,” he says of his paedophilia, although he accepts this isn’t the prevailing view.

Around half of child sex offenders have been found to have been abused themselves as children – yet experts don’t believe suffering abuse turns you into a paedophile. The vast majority of victims, after all, don’t grow up to become abusers, though experiencing abuse could increase your risk of breaking the law generally later in life.

“It could be that biology causes paedophilia, but that environment makes a person more likely to act on that sexual interest and molest a child,” explains James Cantor, a psychologist and sexual behaviour scientist at the University of Toronto in Canada, whose research on the biological indicators of paedophilia has challenged long-held beliefs.

Chemical castration is often pitched as a solution to paedophilia. This usually involves a doctor injecting testosterone-blocking drugs to dampen or eliminate sex drive. There are, however, problems with this option. It also prevents a paedophile from engaging in a healthy adult relationship, which in turn lowers the risk of them abusing a child and stops them managing the reality of their sexual attraction. And if they stop taking their medication, their impulses will return.

John, 76, an educated professional who spent a decade in jail after being convicted of serial assaults on young girls in NSW, takes the drug Androcur as part of a supervision order.

“It has side-effects,” he says. “I grew breasts. I even had to have a mammogram.”

He says the drug does diminish his libido, but he now has an adult girlfriend and hopes to wean himself off the drug when his supervision orders are lifted.

The question of what should be done with child sex offenders in Australia is fraught and for good reason. It centres around the protection our most vulnerable citizens – our children. Imagine your daughter, your grandson or a child you know being molested and it evokes a visceral response. We want nothing more than to protect them.

Turn your mind to the child molester and chances are you want them far away, locked up and closely monitored. It’s this response that has led to strict new laws being introduced in most states and territories over the past 11 years, allowing sex offenders to be detained and supervised even after they’ve served jail sentences. These men wear GPS ankle bracelets that allow corrective services staff to monitor their movement 24/7 via electronic surveillance. They must abide by rules, such as not going within 500m of a school, getting home by curfew, submitting advance schedules of their daily activities and taking medication. Perhaps most controversially, some live together in housing for high-risk offenders.

“[The supervision orders] curtail you,” says John, who wears an ankle bracelet and lives alongside other sex offenders. “You can’t live a normal life. It tends to make you worse because you try to figure out how to get round them.”

John, who was raped by his uncle from the age of five, believes there are sex offenders who are beyond redemption and should live under restrictions, but claims the law is being stretched to cover ex-prisoners who aren’t a real threat.

He says when he questioned his own status rising from low-risk to high-risk after satisfactorily completing a rehabilitation program in jail, a psychiatrist told him, “It’s very simple. What if you go out [of jail] and do something wrong, and we’d said you were low-risk? We will get our arses kicked.’”

John also expressed doubts over the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in jail. “When my 12-month program finished, the two leaders said, ‘We’ve taught you everything about sex. So we’ve either cured you or we have made you into even better sex offenders’.”

A spokesperson for Corrective Services NSW said jails offered several major voluntary therapy programs for sex offenders, one of which was found by an evaluation to reduce reoffending by 70 per cent. Yet those who are still considered to pose a high risk of reoffending when due for release “can and do become candidates to be kept behind bars” or subject to “extremely intense monitoring and supervision in the community for a specified period,” she said.

Nestled amid regenerating native bushland on the edge of prison land in west Brisbane is a quiet strip of nine nondescript residential brick and fibro houses. Surrounded by wire fencing and red-lettered “KEEP OUT” signs, this is home to some of Queensland’s most notorious sex offenders. Officially known as a High Risk Offenders Management Unit (HROMU), the two-storey properties keep about 20 men suspended indefinitely between imprisonment and freedom. “F#ck off you dogs,” shouted an unidentified resident from his balcony when The Weekly visited the housing site last month. “I’ll kick your f#cking head in.”

The men are allowed to leave the housing, but are monitored 24/7 through their ankle bracelets, which are linked via GPS to an electronic surveillance unit, where corrective services staff track their every movement on a computer screen. If they enter forbidden territory, they are immediately contacted by mobile phone and ordered to retreat. Breaches can result in supervision orders being extended by years or even a return to jail.

Critics argue housing sex offenders together may ironically increase their risk of re-offending, especially if they share the same sexual preferences. Not only could it further legitimise the prospect of sex with children, for example, but it may lead to a sharing of ideas about grooming or finding vulnerable kids. Furthermore, their status as social outcasts living on the fringes of society is cemented at a time when they’re supposed to be re-integrating into normal society.

Keen to gauge the reaction of parents living in close quarters with some of the state’s most high-risk sex offenders, The Weekly spoke to families in the friendly middle-class suburb where the Brisbane HROMU is located. Most were unperturbed by the nearby presence of high risk sex offenders. “I wasn’t aware of it,” says Becky, 35, whose kids are playing at a local park. “It does make you feel more wary, especially with the kids, but this area does generally feel safe.”

“I would err of the side of caution over whether [high risk sex offenders] can be rehabilitated,” says another mother, Sandra, 38. “I think there needs to be more emphasis on stricter parole conditions and sentencing.”

Local shop managers were philosophical about safety.

“I reckon we’ve got more police around here than most places, with the prison here,” says one. Another, who has lived in the area all her life, says, “At least if [sex offenders] are down there, they are being kept a close eye on. Mind you, in this day and age, your next-door neighbour could be one and you’d never know about it.”

She’s right in that an estimated 90 per cent of child sex abuse happens at the hands of a friend, family member or trusted acquaintance, such as a babysitter or carer. It’s for this reason that child safety campaigners have moved away from focussing too much on the “stranger danger” message, instead teaching kids how to be assertive about protecting their bodies and speaking out.

Two years ago, WA became the first and only jurisdiction to allow public access to its sex offender register. Police Minister Liza Harvey said the state government was proud of the site, which had been “welcomed by the community” and had had 127,285 hits by mid-March, with no reports of vigilante action against offenders. Yet while it may be popular among concerned parents, the real threat is more likely to be found in their own backyard.

In some ways, accepting that paedophilia is a sexual orientation is more difficult because we can no longer banish it to the “evil monster” box. It is part of the human spectrum, uncomfortable as that may be – some are good people who will never hurt a child, others commit terrible crimes that cause untold harm.

On the other hand, humanising it also has inherent benefits, including preventing child sex abuse. It may make us more aware that it could affect people we know, for example, and make it easier for paedophiles to get professional help. In Canada, for example, there’s a growing move towards officially recognising paedophilia as a sexual orientation, while activists push for paedophile acceptance in The Netherlands.

So what became of Bobby? He is currently serving a jail sentence after pleading guilty to abusing several children and is seeking help for paedophilia. His mother is continuing to support him.

Meanwhile, John hopes to move in with his girlfriend and have his GPS ankle bracelet removed when his supervision orders expire this year. Although he still denies the charges against him, he knows he will probably never have contact with his ex-wife, daughters or grandchildren. “I just want a normal life,” he says. He will remain a registered child sex offender until he is 80.

And after more than a quarter of a century of marriage, Nicholas still has no plans to tell his wife about his innermost desires. “At times, I feel a bit guilty about it,” he says, “but it is frightening. We are very happily married and I don’t think telling her would help either of us.”

To parents like Anne, who discover their child is a paedophile, he offers the following advice.

“They should tell him that they love him, that he is a good person and they are confident that he can live a good life and avoid having sexual contact with children. They should then try to get him help.”

Asked whether he may have passed his paedophilia onto his own children, he replies quickly, “I sure hope not.”

This story was originally published in The Australian Women’s Weekly May 2014.

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

Wedding day signs a marriage won’t last

Here are a few telltale clues that your relationship might end in tears.

There are a few aspects of a wedding that show things may not be as happy as they seem.

Sometimes marriage just doesn’t work, no matter how much the two parties try.

But according to Reddit user ModernDayCinderella (who has worked at more than 100 weddings) when asked the question “what happened at a wedding that let you know the marriage was going to end in divorce?”, she’s seen all the clues that the happy couple’s future may not last.

ModernDayCinderella says that how the couple cut the cake is a big tell-tale sign.

“During the cake cutting, most brides will say don’t smash the cake in their face (or vice versa). If the other person does it anyway, that’s a huge tell for respect.”

“I know it’s all fun and games, but it’s a big tell to overall feelings.”

She also says another indication is how the bride and groom deal with the stress of the day.

ModernDayCinderella says: “Fighting at the wedding about petty things. I’ve seen a lot of this. I know weddings are stressful, but you should be able to work through petty small things easily and move on.

“Almost all of my couples will hold grudges for at least the rest of the night, which in turn, ruins their images.

“I have to be the one that tells them, ‘look, I know you’re p****d at each other right now, but for the sake of your lifetime memories, fake that you like each other for the rest of the night.’”

Then there’s the bridezilla – or the groomzilla, as ModernDayCinderella points out.

“If you’re a Bride / Groomzilla then that’s a tell, too. All of my monsters have been absolute control freaks and refuse to let people help them, but then get p****d that nobody helps them.

“This tells me a lot about your personality and a lot of can be seen in your interaction with your significant other.”

Other Reddit users decided to share their own experiences.

One revealed how the bride interacted with her in-laws was a sign.

“They spent $50k on a Disney wedding and the bride spent zero time anywhere near the in-laws for several hours. She ran off a week later.

“This was over 10 years ago. The awful part is that the guy was/is such a wonderful person. He just attracts ‘crazy.’”

Another mentioned one wedding they’ll never forget:

“During the ceremony when the priest started asking the bride ‘Do you take this man to be your…’, she started laughing uncontrollably and couldn’t stop.

“It was cute for about 10 seconds and then things got real uncomfortable. They lasted a year and change. We all kinda knew the only reason they were getting married was because she got pregnant.”

Do you have any crazy wedding stories? Write to us on Facebook.

Trending video: Ellen DeGeneres is being sued over this segment

Loading the player...

Related stories


Advertisement
Home Page 3181

I became a sex worker at 52

One woman reveals her unusual career change after divorcing her husband of 30 years.

An anonymous Sydney woman has revealed her secret life as a mature-aged escort in a tell-all piece published on news.com.au.

The woman says she was 52 and one year out of a 30-year marriage – the last five years of which had been sexless – when she decided she wanted a career change.

“I was sitting at home and the thought of prostitution entered my mind,” she says. “‘I always wanted to try that,’ I thought. And that was it.

“I have never had a single stretch mark, I’ve always been very slim and had naturally large breasts. So it was the perfect storm (in a DD cup) for me — as I found my niche there for a couple of years.

“For some ungodly reason my body was perfect as was my face and I learnt to act like a sexy vixen. I didn’t need the money, but it was extra cash and I was having a great time, rather than watching Dr Phil or Oprah at home.”

She walked into a dedicated “mature-aged” brothel in Chatswood and asked about a job and to her surprise, got one.

She quickly became the most popular worker at the agency, making $300 an hour to have sex with anyone from teenagers to businessmen in their 70s.

She worked at the brothel for six years, keeping her new job a secret from her family and friends until she eventually quit.

“When I left I knew that it’d changed me so dramatically,” she says. “I became obsessed with money when I’d always been unmaterialistic, I became fake and hard around the edges which did not sit well with me at all.

“But I absolutely don’t regret doing it as I was such a prude and it set me free. I’m 60 next year, and reflecting on that time I realise it was all an act, you become this other person. I enjoyed it while I was there but looking back, I don’t know who that person was.”

Related stories


Advertisement