Home Page 3124

Five things in every home that could kill your child

The smaller they are the larger their curiosity, so even in the safest environments children can find danger. The Weekly Online investigates the hidden dangers in the home.

We’ve all heard the horror stories of kids getting their curious hands (and mouths) on unsuitable household items, resulting in the one hospital trip every parent dreads – and most importantly, wants to avoid.

So what are the most common hidden dangers to children in the home?

The Weekly Online speaks to Dr Louis Cheung, a General Paediatrician at the Prince of Wales Hospital, to find out what household items are leaving Australian children in emergency ward.

1.Paracetamol and Iron supplements

Lock up the medicine cupboard – it’s one of the oldest rules in the parenting book. But what many parents may not know is even the over-the-counter medications (which often seem safe to leave on the kitchen table) can be detrimental if they get into the wrong hands.

While iron supplements can benefit the health of vegetarians, vegans and the iron deficient, they can also be fatal, potentially causing liver failure if consumed by young ones unnecessarily.

“Surprisingly the majority of the poisonings that we see are actually medication related,” says Dr. Chueng.

“People think that it’s relatively benign and so they’re pretty relaxed about it but if we look at [the cases] coming in paracetamol – by and far – is the most common sort of unintentional overdose in our younger kids because it’s so common in the cupboard and easily accessed. Not all the kids die from it but it is potentially dangerous.”

Paracetamol for young children is also more potent than regular paracetamol, says Dr. Chueng, as “the baby drops are quite concentrated obviously because they want to get into a small baby.”

Often the impact of these medications can be delayed, too, as they don’t have a drowsing effect, so it is difficult to notice when a child has consumed them out of sight. And iron supplements in particular are hard to extract, says Dr. Chueng, as “the body absorbs iron very well”.

So make sure they are out of reach, and clean out the medicine cupboard regularly to avoid having medications you don’t need any more being an unnecessary risk in the home.

2.Water (and not just in the swimming pool)

Whether you have a swimming pool or not, water remains an enormous safety hazard for your kids.

Drownings are the second largest cause of death in children Australia-wide, says Dr. Cheung, and this can occur in even a small pool of water.

“We have seen a few cases where the water hasn’t been of great volume.

“Even a little bucket of water in the garden for instance – probably 10 to 20 centimetres of water – and the child’s head gets stuck in there.”

So supervising your children in a shallow bath and making sure buckets around the house are in fact empty are just as important as making sure the pool gate is shut.

3.Blinds and cords

The limitless curiosity of children can be harmful in the lounge room and kitchen, with blinds in particular putting their safety at risk.

Curtain and blind cords can be a hazardous trap for kids to potentially strangle themselves with, so keep these cords out of reach.

But it’s not just the obvious cords in the home that can be a risk. Cords connected to toasters, kettles or other kitchen supplies can be dangerous, with some children ending up at the hospital after tugging them, resulting in the appliance falling off the bench, and sometimes on top of them.

So keep all appliances out of reach, says Dr. Cheung, and put them away whenever you can.

4.Batteries

Children suffocating on and ingesting small dangerous items around the house is always a worry for parents. And batteries are particularly harmful as once swallowed “they actually get digested by the stomach juices,” says Dr. Cheung, which releases the heavy metals which can cause major health problems.

“They don’t necessarily come to the parents’ attention if they swallow a battery immediately,” says Dr. Cheung.

“And then you find out afterwards. Usually by the time it’s dissolved.”

But other items around the house which may seem completely innocent, can also cause trouble in the vicinity of curious and hungry children.

Children coming into emergency have often ingested “mushy bread” and grapes says Dr Cheung, so if you’re children do have a fondness for these foods in particular, make sure they’re out of reach when you’re not supervising your kids at the dinner table.

“They’re always experimenting,” says Dr. Cheung. “That is the issue.”

5.Oven cleaner and bleach

While liquids laced with chemicals are a worry for parents, they are not often desirable to children, says Dr. Cheung, as they are unlikely to drink or consume “something that tastes disgusting”.

But if curious kids do consume or touch even a small amount of some liquids – like oven cleaner and bleach – they can cause serious harm.

“So even if they taste it and it doesn’t taste nice, they can still cause significant burns around the mouth and the nose area which is an issue for the airways,” says Dr. Cheung.

And while children arriving in hospital wards after drinking alcohol-based hand sanitiser have made headlines recently, it is not common says Dr. Cheung, as most hand sanitisers don’t taste nice. But to avoid risk, opt for hand sanitisers that aren’t flavoured.

And the paediatrician’s biggest piece of advice?

“Don’t underestimate your child. They can get into anything.”

Related stories


Home Page 3124

5 cheese myths debunked

The moon certainly isn’t made of it, but some of these cheesy myths almost had us fooled for a second.
Cheese Board

For a seemingly inoffensive supermarket staple, cheese sure knows how to cause a stir.

When it’s not accompanying your weekend wine or saving the day with a quick and easy dinner (hello, mac and cheese), it’s at the middle of some mysterious myths.

So we’ve taken it upon ourselves to get to the bottom of them once and for all.

MYTH: Cheese is bad for your health

Full-fat dairy foods such as cheese, butter and milk cop a lot of blame for health problems such as due to their high level of saturated fats. However, a 2012 study of 5,000 Australians showed that people with a higher intake of dairy actually had a lower risk of cardiovascular disease. Another study at Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute in Melbourne also revealed that eating cheese over a four-week period didn’t adversely affect people’s cholesterol levels as predicted. Conclusion: brie isn’t the bad guy.

MYTH: Cheese gives you nightmares

Ever since Ebenezer Scrooge blamed a “crumb of cheese” for his ghoulish encounters in A Christmas Carol, urban legend would have us believe that eating cheese before bed leads to bad dreams. But in actual fact cheese can be said to regulate sleep – it contains an amino acid called tryptophan which is linked to stable mood and sleep function. A 2005 study by the British Cheese Board also reported no nightmares after giving 200 participants a small piece of cheese 30 minutes before bed. They did note that those who ate cheddar predominantly dreamt about celebrities. Random.

MYTH: Low-fat cheese is healthier

If you’re on a diet or just being cautious with calories ahead of a holiday, switching to low-fat foods is a no-brainer, but you could be falling into a low-fat trap. It’s no secret that full-fat cheese contains more fat, but it also contains a whole lot more protein, too. That means it will keep hunger pangs at bay for longer and help you avoid any calorie-drenched munchies. A Curtin University of Technology study backs this up. It found that increasing your dairy intake can help with weight loss because the extra protein helps to speed up your metabolism. Pass the Gouda.

MYTH: You can’t eat cheese if you’re lactose intolerant

Turns out you don’t have to fully eliminate cheese from your diet if you’re lactose intolerant. In some cases, such as parmesan, cheese doesn’t actually contain any lactose content at all. In others, such as cheddar, Swiss cheese and brie, the lactose content is so minimal – about 0.04g in a 40g block – that it can still be tolerated. As a general rule of thumb, switch to hard cheeses as these contain less lactose and always check the label’s sugar content. Lactose is listed under sugar, so if the number is low or zero, it should still be safe for you to enjoy.

MYTH: Mice love cheese

If you’ve got little ones, chances are they think mice exist solely on a diet of cheese! Countless movies, cartoons and nursery rhymes play on the myth, but it’s actually far from true. A 2006 Manchester Metropolitan University study discovered that mice avoid cheese, instead satisfying their sweet tooth with grains, fruits and other sweet things. If hungry enough, they won’t turn their nose up at a bit of cheese or cardboard, but save the stilton for you. It’s too pungent for their sensitive noses and they’ll smell your trap a mile away.

Brought to you by ALDI. Take the Supermarket Switch Challenge today and discover high quality groceries at everyday low prices.

Related stories


Home Page 3124

Pete Evans dishes up some dangerous advice

The celebrity chef has made headlines after advising his fans to abandon sunscreen due to “poisonous chemicals”.
Pete Evans

Uh oh…

My Kitchen Rules star Pete Evans has angered cancer research experts after advising his 1.5 million Facebook fans to spend time in the sun, sans sun protection.

The celebrity chef frequently surfs with his two daughters Indii and Chilli.

When asked by a fan on his official Facebook page what sunscreen he prefers, the father-of-two replied admitting that he wears “generally nothing” and that those who do slip slop slap are simply covering “themselves in poisonous chemicals.”

“I keep an all over tan all year and don’t stay out for super long periods in the sun,” he said before revealing that when he spends four hours in the sun, he uses a product called Surf Mud which hasn’t been approved by the Australian TGA as an efficient sunscreen.

“The silly thing is people put on normal chemical sunscreen then lay out in the sun for hours on end and think that they are safe because they have covered themselves in poisonous chemicals which is a recipe for disaster as we are witnessing these days,” the polarising chef explained.

“We need to respect the sun but not hide from it either as it is so beneficial for us, but use common sense. The goal is always never to burn yourself.”

Sun damage starts in as little as ten minutes, and can occur without a sunburn – just ask Kim Kardashian!

Whilst it’s true that sunbaking for hours on end, even with sunscreen on, isn’t a wise health decision, advising readers to forgo sun protection altogether can relay severe consequences, says The Cancer Council’s director of education Terry Slevin.

“The science is clear, increased ­exposure to UV radiation equals an increased risk of skin cancer and this is from people who have been researching this for decades,” the health professional told News.com.au.

Watch the video below to be reminded of the importance of sun safety! Post continues…

Loading the player...

“Sunscreen use, including UV absorbers, which he refers to as chemical sunscreen, has been proven to reduce skin cancer risk.”

“The question is who should people take their advice from on sun protection. Mr Evans is not someone I would call on for that advice. It’s yet another case of someone (in this case with a media profile) undermining the safety and efficacy of sunscreen.”

Considering that sun damage starts in as little as ten minutes, and skin cancers cause 1400 deaths in Australia each year, we think we might continue to slip slop slap with good old-fashioned suncream liberally, thank you very much.

Sunscreen has been proven to prevent basal cell carcinomas and melanomas.

Related stories


Home Page 3124

Why I had a baby without waiting for Mr Right

After 10 rounds of IVF, Natalie finally has the baby she's longed for - and she did it all without a man in her life.
Should you wait for the right partner before starting a family?

Most women dream of beginning a family with the perfect partner, but sometimes Mister Right, or The Perfect Partner whatever the persuasion may be, is elusive.

Sadly, the biological clock waits for no (wo)man. If there is a gentle ticking in your life, should you continue waiting in hope that if and when they come along you will still be able to conceive?

Natalie Cooley, now 40, began looking at her options at 35 years old because she did not want waiting for a partner to affect her dream for a child.

“I’ve been single a long time. I was dating but I didn’t meet that special someone. It’s not that I don’t want a man, or I wasn’t waiting for him, I just worried that I was running out of time,” says Natalie.

“At 35, I decided to freeze my eggs and wait for Mister Right, but after a few months I wondered why I was waiting because even if I did find Mister Right, there was no guarantees it would work out and it would just delay me again with my age and put me back with a baby.”

Natalie’s family was 100% supportive of her going it alone, and they were with her throughout the journey. Natalie also found that men she dated during the five years it took were also supportive and willing to stick around, but none of them were the special man she was seeking.

“I had 10 rounds of IVF, and eventually after five years of trying, I have a three week old daughter,” she says.

“I did every possible thing to have her. She was planned and wanted and loved. I have no regrets, although I wish I started sooner. When you think you are ready doesn’t necessarily mean it will happen.”

Celeste Ferraris waited for her partner of nine years to be ready to begin a family but when it became apparent that day was not imminent, they separated.

“It ended when I finally realised it wasn’t going to happen in the timeframe I needed it to, I was 38. I decided then to look into my fertility options – either freezing eggs or perhaps going it alone,” Celeste tells.

A fertility diagnosis revealed a low egg count, which made Celeste reconsider undergoing the procedure.

“At the age of 38, even though I had little chance of falling pregnant due to the low egg reserve, after considering IVF alone, I actually decided that I didn’t want to have children on my own.

“When I decided to try IVF at the age of 41 after I had naturally fallen pregnant but miscarried, I felt very differently. I had moved through that break up, grown as a person, found inner strength and confidence that I could manage on my own.”

Unfortunately, after 15 months and three cycles, Celeste was unsuccessful in her dream for a child, leaving her wondering if beginning sooner would have had a different outcome.

For some mums, the concern is that it may not be the best outcome for a child to be born without a father present but research shows that children born to single mums with no father present are as well-adjusted as other kids.

The study conducted by the Centre for Family Research at the University of Cambridge, UK, evaluated 51 solo mothers with children from donors and 52 two-parent families. They also took into consideration things like education and demographic factors.

Although there was a reported higher level of financial and parenting stress with the solo mothers, the children showed no significant difference between the two circumstances.

“Between the ages of four and nine, donor-conceived children in solo mother families generally seem to be doing well,” reported Dr Sophie Zadeh in the study.

“However, we don’t yet know how these children will fare over time, or what they will think and feel about being donor-conceived and/or growing up without a father in the home as they grow older.

“In general, our findings seem to suggest that what matters most for children’s outcomes in solo mother families is not the absence of a father, nor donor conception, but the quality of parenting, and positive parent-child relationships.

“These findings therefore echo much of what we already know about the determinants of children’s psychological adjustment in other family types.”

If you’re waiting for the right partner to begin your family, and they don’t turn up you have three options, suggests fertility specialist, Dr David Knight from Demeter Fertility.

“You can decide not to have kids, you can go ahead and use donor sperm and have a baby by yourself or you can freeze your eggs,” he says.

“It’s a very individual and personal choice.”

“The earlier people freeze eggs the likelier they are to work. However, if you do it too early chances are you may meet someone and you will never need to use the eggs. You do it too late, and the quality of the eggs may they may not work anyway,” tells Dr Knight.

“The sweet spot seems to be about 36 or 37 years old. It seems about the time where you get best value for money regarding use,” he says.

“The bottom line is it depends how much people are prepared to pay for reproductive insurance.”

The process of retrieving eggs costs the same as IVF. Then you pay monthly, or annually to freeze them but this process still comes with no assurance of a perfect partner coming along.

Australia currently has the second highest number, after Italy, of women choosing not to have children so if that’s the path you choose to take, you are certainly no longer an anomaly.

But if a child is your deepest desire, know that the choice right for you, will also be the choice right for a child.

Related stories


Home Page 3124

The alarming truth about IVF

It's hailed as a reproductive miracle, but your chance of actually delivering a healthy baby are much lower than clinics would have you believe.
IVF baby

There are many reasons women wait before trying for a family. Perhaps it’s societal and they simply don’t meet the right partner, or they choose to wait in order to first focus on their career.

Author of Moving Beyond The Unspoken Grief; a doctors journey as an IVF patient, Sarah Lynn, was in a loving relationship, but both she and her partner were focused on getting medical careers on track. A general practitioner with a special interest in women’s health and pregnancy care, Sarah knew first-hand the implications of waiting to begin a family.

“I would see people who decided to wait and they think ‘I can just freeze my eggs and wait until I find the perfect partner, and then everything will be alright.’ But the thing is, it’s the age and the quality of eggs,” she says. “The older you become, there are other issues that come into the equation too, like how receptive the womb will be.”

“For us, our medical training was really long. Although I was ready sooner, I was working days, and he was working nights. Our biological clocks weren’t matching. We started trying naturally when I was 30, but after a couple of years when it wasn’t happening, we realised we needed to get help,” tells Sarah.

Sarah found it harder and harder to continue with her work in antenatal shared care. Helping mothers face decisions about unplanned pregnancy became too hard and she changed careers.

“Whilst we were trying to conceive, each failed attempt took a hard emotional toll on myself, and working in the sexual health and unplanned pregnancy field was too hard,” she says. “We took a year off (IVF) to focus on the relationship. I had gained a lot of weight due to medications, my husband and I were stressed, so we decided to mend the relationship and we would start again when the time was right.”

Sarah eventually fell pregnant and now has a two-year-old and another on the way, but the journey has not been easy.

IVF is a wonderful technology that gives women who would otherwise be unable to conceive the opportunity to have a baby, but what many women don’t know is that their chance of falling pregnant this way are less than half. In fact, for women under 30, it is around 42 per cent.

For women over 40, that figure drops to only eight per cent.

Celeste Ferraris waited nine years for her partner to be ready for a child. They eventually separated, and she began IVF on her own.

“The physical examinations showed that I was very healthy and my body could successfully carry a pregnancy through to full term, but the anti-mullerian hormone test was extremely low, indicating that I didn’t have many eggs left. After looking into the percentage success rates of a 38-year-old with a low reserve, I saw that it would be near impossible,” she says.

Celeste decided not to undergo IVF but after an accidental natural pregnancy, which resulted in a miscarriage, Celeste realised that she wanted to give having a child her best shot using donor sperm.

“I went through three cycles and that took approximately 15 months. Given my low egg reserve and age, the first cycle was very successful. Only six eggs were harvested (that was to be expected) but what they didn’t expect was that four embryos would form. That is highly unusual statistically. To get one embryo I was told that they normally need about 11 or 12 eggs. From the four embryos, three implantations occurred, all of which miscarried,” she tells.

Celeste decided to stop the process at 42, and although the yoga teacher is happy with her life, there is still a sadness that she will not have a family of her own.

“It has been three years since I stopped IVF and there have been moments when grief over not having children and not being a mother overwhelms me and I break down and sob. The triggers for this usually take me by surprise and are not necessarily linked to a child or motherhood, but all of a sudden I realise why I’m crying and I let the flood of sadness out.”

The reality of IVF is that it’s a numbers game and fertility specialist, David Knight of Demeter Fertility, knows the odds intimately.

“Basically, IVF depends on how often someone produces an egg that’s good enough to make a baby. For someone in their early 20s, they may make an egg good enough to make a baby every month or two months, but by the time they reach their 40s, they probably only make an egg good enough to make a baby once a year,” he says.

“The problem then is if they do an IVF cycle in a month where the best egg isn’t good enough to make a baby, we don’t have the technology currently to change that. That is kind of the bottom line.”

We also don’t have the technology to know if the egg is good enough to make a baby, so the only thing we can do is try each month. This is why many women undergo multiple cycles over many months and still do not have success.

“It’s an odds game,” says David. “This is where the IVF industry doesn’t really portray the most accurate way of doing that.”

“It is not about how many embryos you put back, but it’s about how many embryos you put back with the best egg from a particular month. There is a misconception that the more eggs you have the more shots you have, but it’s not the case, because it’s not like buying a box of eggs from IGA,” he says.

When you ovulate naturally, your body releases the best egg, but when you undergo IVF, they take all of the eggs whether they‘re good or not. This doesn’t necessarily increase the chances of a thriving embryo.

It is irrefutable that IVF helps thousands of people to have the families they desire but truth of the matter is, no matter how miraculous it is for some, for many others the odds against them will be too great.

Related stories


Home Page 3124

The oldest actors to play teenagers

They play teenagers onscreen but you'd be amazed how old some of the actors playing your favourite characters really were.

They play teenagers onscreen but you’d be amazed how old some of the actors playing your favourite characters really were.

Many mouths are left agape when told that the rough girl Rizzo in Grease was played by a 34-year-old Stockard Channing. That’s right, 34! Or that the ever charming teenage bad boy Fonzie was brought to life by Henry Winkler, who was actually 17 years older than his on screen character.

While some age gaps might be obvious, some actors’ ability to remain ageless is astounding. Here are some stars who have had us fooled.

TV’s ultimate bad boy 17-year-old Dylan McKay of Beverly Hills 90210 was actually played by 25-year-old Luke Perry.

Dawson, Fonzie and Rizzo were all teenagers played by older actors.

Stockard Channing pulled off an 16-year age difference. The actress was 34 when she played 18-year-old Rizzo in the 1978 musical Grease.

At 29, Gabrielle Carteris, who played 16-year-old schoolgirl Andrea Zuckerman, was 13 years older than her Beverly Hills 90210 character.

When Buffy first hit our screens in 1997, Buffy’s supernatural lover boy Angel was a centuries old vampire trapped in a 26-year-old’s body. David Boreanaz was the actor who brought the blood sucker to life and was 35, nine years older than his character.

James Van Der Beek says he came close to not being cast on Dawson’s Creek because he looked too old. The actor played 15-year-old Dawson Leery when he was actually 20.

Stacey Dash was 28 when she played ditzy 17-year-old Dion Davenport in the 1995 film, Clueless. The ageless actress also reprised the role in the TV series that followed.

Henry Winkler was 17 years older than his Happy Days character Arthur “Fonzie” Fonzarelli.

Emilia Clarke plays Daenerys Targaryen on Game of Thrones. While Daenerys’ approximate age on GOT is 16 Emilia’s actually a decade older at 26.

It may come as no surprise that Gina Riley was not exactly the same age as her 25-year-old character Kim Day Craig in Kath and Kim. While Kim was 25, Gina was actually 10 years older when she began playing the part.

Michael J. Fox was 24 when he played 17-year-old Scott Howard Marty McFly in Back to the Future in 1985.

Harry Shum Jr. plays Mike Chang on Glee. Mike’s approximate age on Glee is around 19 while Harry is 31.

In The O.C.’s first season actor Benjamin McKenzie was 25, a decade older than his on-screen counterpart, Ryan Atwood.

Mark Salling who plays hunky teen Puck on Glee is actually 31 while his onscreen character is around 19.

Wood Harris was 31 years old when filming Remember The Titans (2000). Julius Campbell’s age was 18 so that was a 13-year age difference!

At age 26, actor Scott Wolf was a whole decade older than his 16-year-old teenage character Bailey in the 90s hit Party of Five.

Ian Ziering was 26 years old when he posed as bratty teenager Steve Sanders in Beverly Hills 90210.

Tammin Sursok plays 19-year-old Jenna Marshall on Pretty Little Liars but baby faced Tammin is a whole 11 years older at 30.

Calista Flockhart was 31 years old filming The Birdcage (1996) when her goody-two-shoes character, Barbara Keeley’s age was around 18.

Ralph Macchio is probably best-known for playing teenager Daniel LaRusso in the 1984 hit film “The Karate Kid.” Macchio was 24 at the time. He went on to star in two other films in the franchise.

Tobey Maguire was 26 while filming Spider-Man in 2002 when he played 17-year-old Peter Parker.

Related stories


Home Page 3124

Inside Gai Waterhouse’s $5.4m house

We're imagining ourselves moving in...
Inside Gai Waterhouse's $5.4m house

Australian horse trainer and businesswoman Gai Waterhouse and husband Robbie have just sold their incredible four-bedroom home in Mosman, Sydney.

They had a few unsuccessful attempts of selling the North Shore home but it has now gone under the hammer for an undisclosed amount. They listed the luxury property for $5.4 million.

The couple had lived in it for 32 years and raised their kids Tom and Kate there, so we’re sure they’ll get emotional saying goodbye to it.

Overlooking the stunning Sydney harbour, the house boasts four double bedrooms, a guest cottage, a mosaic-tiled pool, heated floors and a fireplace.

It even features a hat cupboard that previously held all of Gai’s gorgeous fascinators!

Click through to see inside the stunning home.

Pics via 2088 Realty

Related stories


Home Page 3124

Tyra Banks says being a new mum to son York is “heaven”

The supermodel opens up about the joys and challenges of motherhood while balancing a makeup empire.
Tyra Banks

She’s tackled just about every career path under the sun, but it’s safe to say that Tyra Banks has finally found the role she likes best.

She’s a model, TV personality, actress, author and the CEO of her very own company, but Tyra Banks knows that time spent with her son is always the most valuable – even if it’s just for a few minutes in the middle of the night.

“Even just last night, I picked him up out of his crib and I’m like, ‘I know I’m not supposed to, he’s sleeping all night,'” she began, confessing that being a first-time mum is “heaven” despite her tiredness.

“But I just picked him up and I just held him for 20 minutes at three in the morning, knowing I had to be here bright eyed for a photoshoot.”

“It’s that love.”

Tyra looked totally in her element in this first photo shared of baby York.

Back in March, the modelling maven gave her first interview since welcoming her darling son via a surrogate in January.

Speaking to E! News at her first public event since becoming a mummy, she admitted how tiring parenting can be.

“Some mornings you wake up, and you’re like, ‘Where am I? I don’t know what’s going on.’ And I know it’s not a good idea for me to drive right now because I did not sleep,'” she explained.

“So I balance that and his dad helps, and we go back and forth so that’s good.”

Papa Erik is doing his fair share to help!

York’s dad and Tyra’s boyfriend, Erik Asla, has been a huge help to the 42-year-old, with the new mama adding, “Erik does about 40 percent diaper duty at night. So we’re almost fifty-fifty.”

The couple welcomed their little bundle of baby boy joy with help from a surrogate.

Watch Tyra open up about her emotional pregnancy struggles in the video player below. Post continues…

Loading the player...

“The best present we worked and prayed so hard for is finally here,” the model shared on Instagram with a photo of a teeny-tiny baby beanie.

“He’s got my fingers and big eyes and his daddy Erik’s mouth and chin. As we thank the angel of a woman that carried our miracle baby boy for us, we pray for everyone who struggles to reach this joyous milestone. York Banks Asla, welcome to the world.”

While the new papa added, “Witnessing the dawn of life is possibly life’s greatest gift.”

Related stories


Home Page 3124

Liv Tyler and David Gardner welcome a darling baby girl!

Liv Tyler has become a mummy for the third time, confirming she and fiancé Dave Garner welcomed a daughter.

The couple, who are proud parents to their one-year-old son Sailor Gene, announced the happy news on Instagram.

Liv introduced her baby girl to the world with a photo of her cuddled up to her daddy.

“Hello!!!!! Our beautiful baby girl is here !!!!” she penned, revealing her little one’s name, “Lula Rose Gardner we are sooooo happy heart exploding with love !!!!!”

Isn’t she lovely!?

This is the third child for Liv. The 38-year-old mum already has 11-year-old son, Milo, who she shares with her ex-husband, Royston Langdon.

Her fiance is also a dad to eight-year-old son, Grey, from a previous relationship.

Watch Liv talk about her pregnancy! Post continues…

Loading the player...

The Leftovers starlet announced she was expecting in January.

“Oh my goodness it seems the stork is visiting us again!!!!” she shared alongside a black-and-white Instagram photo.

“I am growing another little Tyler Gardner in my belly. Our family is growing!!! So grateful. @davidgardner I love you.”

Congratulations to the happy couple!

Related stories


Home Page 3124

Can you find the phone hidden on this rug?

This is one magic carpet.

This person has really taken colour coordination to a whole new level.

In fact, we’d go far as to say that it’s the greatest matching combo we’ve ever come across.

So, can you spot the phone in the rug?

We had to look pretty hard…

The camera lens is the only thing that gives it away!

It’s stumped thousands of people on Facebook and has gotten more than 18,000 shares.

So good!

Related stories